1) Are some subjects harder than others: yes, says this review. The hardest GCSEs are a grade harder than the easiest ones; the hardest A levels are two grades harder than the easiest. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… $
2) If we aligned them (so that, on average, a student is likely to get the same grade in each of their subjects), this would lead to substantial changes in the grade distribution/students' results in some subjects.
3) But does that mean we should align them? This paper (written by Ofqual employees but not the official Ofqual view) argues not, because their purpose is to validate achievement in the subject.
4) But the key takeaway for me is that there are very poor grounds to expect students to be getting a 4 in all their subjects (for example)...
5) For everyone who's asking about non-paywalled versions, try these working papers: gov.uk/government/pub…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Can women read 4 sentences in their local language?
Based on surveys across 87 countries, this fascinating paper by @Alenestour@lhmosco & @JustinSandefur uses this to estimate how educational quality has changed over time.
You may remember the classic Anders Ericsson study of violinists (1993) – the article that launched the ten thousand hour rule and deliberate practice more generally (here): mrbartonmaths.com/resourcesnew/8…
The centrepiece was an analysis of the role of deliberate practice among violinists. In this paper, @BrookeMacnamara and team have conducted a careful, preregistered replication of Ericsson's work. artscimedia.case.edu/wp-content/upl…
The key point _the foundation stone_ of Ericsson's work is that the best violinists practised the most. Macnamara's group didn't find the same result.
How can you teach teachers to be responsive to students’ needs? Particularly if you’re using practice…? Doesn’t it risk creating automata?
In this cool study, @sskavanagh examined video of teacher educators' practice in encouraging teacher responsiveness.
Two key findings: 1) The _more_ constrained teachers’ choices about what text to study, what discussion format, the more they could focus on responding to students’ points. Responsiveness is hard, you need to be able to concentrate on it. K1 and 2
2) Teacher educators can encourage responsiveness by offering feedback focusing on why a teacher's action is useful in a given circumstance (rather than why it's a 'best practice' in general. But - trained teacher moves are an important part of this.
1) Excellent paper by @BrookeMacnamara and colleagues on growth mindset. They test six claims from growth mindset advocates (e.g. growth mindset people pursue learning goals, respond well to negative feedback). artscimedia.case.edu/wp-content/upl…
2) They find:
- No support for three claims
- Very weak support for two claims
- One claim in the opposite direction (specifically, people with a fixed mindset respond significantly _better_ to negative feedback, not worse, as predicted)
3) It was a carefully-designed, preregistered study among undergraduates - good evidence to consider rethinking growth mindset.
1) I have been very sceptical about growth mindset over the last few years, but a new study has substantially changed my mind…
2) In research-design terms, this was bulletproof: pre-registered, randomly-assigned, teachers didn't know which students got the growth mindset intervention and analysis team didn't know the hypothesis or which group was which.
3) Students did 2 x 25-minute online activities about growth mindset: just telling them that we can get smarter (not telling them to practice). These were conveyed using various powerful techniques (like stories from role models).