Many of the same people have been paid to push these false alarming, apocalyptic warnings & the scientists aren’t paid nearly as well as the elites but they ARE PAID to produce desired results
The article from 2007 & the “scare” came in the early 70’s.
Why would anyone take James Hansen seriously? What do you think motivated his 180?
Ever wonder how China stole our intellectual property in broad daylight?
Well, they didn’t steal it, they were given it.
@realDonaldTrump is correct when he said we had the dumbest (I would argue evil) people negotiating these deals.
“Li seized on Kerry's proposal for deeper co-operation on green technology research, calling this 'immediately realistic'," a cable reports. Li says: "China wishes the US would lift high technology export restrictions"”
Ya don’t say?
Kerry would negotiate a deal on Obama’s behalf that would hurt American workers and companies and make China, Biden and Obama tons of money?
Connie Hedergaard was the EU comissioner on climate change
Finally, then why the need to manipulate data?
Ask how much grant $ the scientists who don’t agree with the bogus climate science or BS narrative have gotten in comparison to the climate alarmists
• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.
@va_shiva will take down Liz Warren when she loses the primary.
Watch him explain the hoax.
The elites buy carbon offsets & still polute & we lose cars, buses cows & plane travel.
This alone should tell you it was never about climate
The bottom line is that this isn’t science at all. It’s a money grab and a power grab and they play on your emotion.
We have been lied to and there are still many people who are blindly following a climate movement they know nothing about. Minimal research brings about a thread like this