In response to the criticism that by offering my content free of charge on a "pay what you will" model I am "grifting" I will now exclusively be shilling for corporations and catering content not to what is important but to what massive corporations think will sell products
New videos include
"New Chocolate Brownie Blast DESTROYS Plebs taste Buds"
And
"Proving Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Shampoo Is Great With LOGIC and FACTS"
But seriously
These people are insane
If I wanted money I'd be making family friendly vlogs, not working for years with no days off and telling people to pay what they'd like
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
She made false claims as to my view on the 2020 election saying I supported Trumps fraud narrative despite debating Bannon twice saying Trump lost
She made false claims about our Youtube advertisers dropping us
@AndrewBaileyMO and @KenPaxtonTX should investigate them for criminal fraud.
They appear to be soliciting donations under false pretenses
notice wapo's legally defensive language here
"jammi said"
the reason for this is because her statements are likely false or unverifiable and thus Wapo doesnt want to get sued by making a false statement themselves
They put the claim solely on Jammi, who is lying
we have not lost a single advertiser on youtube
She seems to play this dirty game where we expand our business and then she claims that the change was due to her actions.
We take ads off our site to promote our books, live events, and merch because its more profitable, we start running ads for our own brands to expand external business, diversifying our income, and she immediately claims, falsely, that we lost advertisers and that she was responsible.