Jonathan Smucker Profile picture
Aug 12, 2019 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The old guard of the Democratic Party seems to have no grasp of the monumental historical opportunity they have with @BernieSanders, who is uniquely positioned to bring tens of millions of disaffected voters and young low-propensity voters out to vote in 2020.
@BernieSanders Bernie's has shown an unparalleled ability to engage with disaffected voters, to win over persuadable conservative voters, and to organize an enormous base of dedicated volunteers and small donors. These are exactly the ingredients we need to defeat Trump.
@BernieSanders But the reality is you can't have Bernie—and the vision he represents—ascend in the Democratic Party without huge changes that will adversely impact the career politicians and operatives who comprise the corporate-friendly old guard of the Democratic Party.
@BernieSanders Many of these careerists would rather keep their jobs, status, and hegemony within a Democratic Party that loses in 2020 than lose their jobs, status, and hegemony within a Democratic Party that wins in 2020.
@BernieSanders Obviously no one would admit that to themselves or others, so they cling to a narrative about "moderate electability," even if all the empirical evidence from the past 20 years suggests that the opposite is true for general elections.
@BernieSanders Bernie Sanders' dilemma, however, is that while he may be the strongest candidate in the general election, this is because he's able to inspire disaffected and low-propensity voters, and these voters are far less likely than affluent voters to turn out to vote in a primary.
Republicans and independent voters who Bernie wins over can't vote for him in the primary (in most states) unless they change their registration to Democrat, and with enough lead time.
This is why the Sanders campaign's ground game is so important. We have to knock millions of doors and make millions of phone calls and talk to our neighbors and friends and family members. It's our path to winning the primary.

Time to start volunteering: act.berniesanders.com/signup/volunte…
The biggest reason I support Bernie Sanders is because my assessment is that he has a far better chance than any other candidate to defeat Donald Trump.
Funny how establishment types still like to bring up how the more progressive Dem nominee (McGovern) lost the general election in NINETEEN-FUCKING-SEVENTY-TWO. But they take exactly zero responsibility for the losses of Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Al Gore.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Smucker

Jonathan Smucker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonathansmucker

Oct 30, 2023
I was part of a grassroots machine that turned out tens of thousands of unlikely PA voters for Biden 2020. He wasn't our top pick but we worked hard to defeat Trump.

Hearing now from so many of our volunteers that they cannot in good conscience vote for him again.

#CeasefireNOW
It's not just votes that Biden is losing. He's losing thousands of the hardworking volunteers who roll up their sleeves and do the thankless work of knocking door after door and making phone call after phone call to persuade voters and get out the vote.
Predictable establishment Dem responses to what I'm pointing out here:

1. Doubt that volunteers like this make a difference in election outcomes.

2. Attack the voters and volunteers for being stupid and enabling a Trump/Republican victory.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 1, 2021
It is irresponsible journalism to refer to Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema as "moderates."

Words have meanings! They also have positive and negative associations that have an effect on readers and viewers.

Have an ed board meeting about it or whatever, but please make it stop.
The labels "moderate" and "centrist" are associated with the idea of the "median voter." The implication is that "moderates" are closer to the position of most voters who are "in the middle" and alienated from the extreme poles of either political party...
Political elites have been wrapping themselves in the label "moderate" for decades to push agendas that are highly unpopular with working-class people (e.g., "free trade" deals and deregulation of Wall Street).
Read 4 tweets
Aug 15, 2021
What depresses the hell out of me when listening to Democratic politicians, liberal advocacy groups, and unapologetic leftists alike, is how rarely I hear people even try to speak in popular/majoritarian language.
And I'm primarily talking about spokespeople here—folks who are presumably trained or prepared to be connecting with popular or particular social bases in order to activate them or win their sympathy.
A Matt Karp interview earlier this year hits on some of this and is really worth reading: niskanencenter.org/how-democrats-… @karpmj
Read 13 tweets
Mar 6, 2021
Senator @kyrstensinema’s history and psychology is as fascinating as it is depressing. She seems motivated by a somewhat personal resentment of “the Left” and her own experience of its ineffectiveness and naval-gazing (in a particular time period)…
She and I are roughly the same age. I also came of age with the same backdrop of a weak, dysfunctional Left. It often felt like we didn't have anything big enough to really accurately call a "movement"; it might sound harsh, but we had residue from when there had been a movement.
I too became disillusioned with the pathologies of what I too often experienced as a small and insular Left—a little clubhouse that often seemed completely uninterested in building or wielding real political power. I've written a lot about this experience in @hegemonyhowto
Read 23 tweets
Jan 8, 2021
If we want a future that is not run (/run into the ground) by literal Nazis, we will have to fight for it. There is no "back to brunch."
If we want to defeat authoritarianism, we will need to do a lot better than condemning its most heinous visible acts.

We have to confront the underlying crisis of runaway inequality that has created conditions where authoritarian demagogues and movements flourish.
If the Biden Administration and Democrats in Congress fail to deliver big for working class people (urban and rural, young and old, of every race), then the next consolidation of authoritarian power will likely be far worse than the one we have just endured.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 4, 2020
Insurgent strategy must always be grounded in a sober assessment of the present balance of forces.

But it must also be grounded in a visionary imagining of how forces can favorably shift when insurgents capture the momentum.

The real trick is to hold both things at once.
Don't let people who aren't accountable to an organized base set the strategy.
Don’t demonize your opponents to the point that you neglect to study them.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(