Tom K. Wong Profile picture
Aug 13, 2019 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
My new report showing how the #PublicCharge rule will negatively impact undocumented immigrants and their families usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/u… 1\
Before diving into the data, much attention has been paid to how the #PublicCharge rule will affect future flows into the U.S. Less attention has been paid to how the rule will affect undocumented immigrants who want to adjust their immigration status 2\
DHS wrote a section about #PublicCharge and undocumented immigrants who wanted to legalize under IRCA in 1986. If #PublicCharge is a backdoor to decreasing legal immigration, it is also a barrier to undocumented immigrants attempting to adjust their status 3\
And if language like this 👇 is interpreted to apply to undocumented immigrants who are currently working in the U.S. without authorization, the new #PublicCharge rule could prove to be an insurmountable obstacle to undocumented immigrants attempting to adjust their status 4\
In our survey experiment, we found that when undocumented immigrants are told about the proposed #PublicCharge rule, they are significantly less likely to get emergency healthcare services when needed 5\
When told about the proposed #PublicCharge rule, they are also significantly less likely to get preventive healthcare, such as regular's doctors visits, and are significantly less likely to get free immunization services 6\
These patterns hold for undocumented parents, as they are significantly less likely to get emergency healthcare, preventive healthcare, or free immunization services for their children when told about the proposed #PublicCharge rule 7\
Undocumented parents with children in K-12 education were also significantly less likely to get free or reduced-priced school meals for their children 8\
We fielded the survey experiment before the final #PublicCharge rule was released. We may be under-estimating the negative effects of the rule. When the rule becomes official policy, I expect the effects to be much more acute \end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom K. Wong

Tom K. Wong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TomWongPhD

Mar 15, 2021
THREAD: Let's put southern border statistics into perspective. As media outlets have reported on a "surge," many have given more time than is warranted to Biden administration policies serving as "magnets" — there's not enough evidence to support this 1/
CBP highlights month to month changes in apprehensions of unaccompanied minors. From Jan to Feb 2021, there was a 28% increase, which some point to as constituting a "surge." But analyzing these data month to month paints only part of the portrait 2/
The data can be found here: cbp.gov/newsroom/stats… 3/
Read 14 tweets
Oct 29, 2019
Thread: NEW data and research out on the Remain in Mexico policy. We show asylum seekers are being sent to Mexico despite telling U.S. immigration officials their persecutor(s) can find and have access to them there. Data also show violence and homelessness are systematic. 1\
This report is based on over 600 interviews with asylum seekers in Tijuana, Mexico and in Mexicali, Mexico. No person was interviewed unless we could verify their MPP status. Verification of MPP status was done by examining the DHS paperwork of our respondents 2/
Regarding process and protections against refoulement, nearly 9 out of every 10 (89.5%) who were asked by U.S. immigration officials about fear of being returned to Mexico responded by expressing fear of being returned to Mexico 3/
Read 21 tweets
Sep 19, 2019
New research from our 2019 #DACA survey. For the first time, we asked about the specific concerns #DACA recipients have about returning to their respective countries of birth. Lives and livelihoods could be at risk 1\ @CAPimmigration @NILC @UNITEDWEDREAM americanprogress.org/?p=474636
93% of respondents reported concerns about either their or their family’s physical safety, health care, education, food security, or risk of homelessness in their respective countries of birth 2\
More specifically, 80% reported, “In my country of birth, I would be concerned about the physical safety of myself and my family” 3\
Read 10 tweets
Aug 28, 2019
My new report based on intakes of over 7,000 asylum-seeking families provides systematic evidence of sub-standard conditions in immigration detention and mistreatment of asylum seekers. In many ways, it's worse than we thought usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/u… 1\
From Oct 2018-Jun 2019, the San Diego Rapid Response Network (SDRRN) helped over 7,000 asylum-seeking families who were admitted into the U.S. These families totaled over 17,000 people, including 7,900 children five years or younger. We independently analyzed SDRRN's intakes 2\
Over 1 out of every 3 of the asylum-seeking heads of households reported issues related to conditions in immigration detention, treatment in detention, or medical issues 3\
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(