A few words about #Niagen--the journey from yeast to ppl. Pellagra was cured with foods 100 yrs ago. Elvehjem showed NA & NAM are pellagra-preventive 80 yrs ago. Extensive data show beneficial effects of high dose NA in ppl, though uses are limited by flushing. /1
RDA guidelines indicate that ~15 mg/day prevents pellagra but no research has established amounts of a "niacin equivalent" to optimize health. Our 15 yrs work on #nicotinamideriboside establish that it is a uniquely powerful NAD precursor in animal models of metabolic stress. /2
Clearly, at high doses, the 3 forms of B3 are not equivalent. Value of NR derives from wide expression of NRK1 gene & induced expression of NRK1,NRK2 when NAD is under attack (best examples: fatty liver, neurodegeneration, heart failure). /3
@ChromaDex did things the right way: NDI and GRAS notifications, human safety studies establishing oral availability & now there are dozens of therapeutic trials. Some ppl criticize us for not making human health claims. Others for @truniagen selling an OTC product. /4
We take an evidence-based & safety-first approach. I don't "recommend Niagen"--I'm not your doctor. I do take it & was the first person to do so. I certainly recommend ppl not take stuff that's not safety tested. /5
I do research in animals & ppl to dissect mechanisms & to identify the ppl who will benefit the most. Ppl using the product have in fact generated hypotheses we would not have had from animal research alone. Examples: grey hair regaining pigmentation, jetlag & workout recovery./6
We're encouraged that the technologies of quantifying the NAD metabolome & looking at when NRK1,2 genes are induced are a roadmap to conditions in which NR is active. We'll always be guided by safety, evidence and ethical conduct. We're going as fast as we can and no faster 🤓🙏.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
today @davidasinclair is telling the world that he has achieved age reversal with chemical cocktails
he submitted the paper on June 30 & it was accepted on July 4 by a journal of which he is coeditor-in-chief
paper was sent to me 3 days ago by a reporter for comment
reporter was told it is a "groundbreaking study" & "the first chemical approach to reprogram cells to a younger state"
reason WSJ didn't cover that paper is that ppl have been reporting chemical compounds that drive conversion of cells to induced pluripotency for the last 10-15 years
all of the compounds in today's paper were previously reported by others, mostly in 2013
there's a peer review failure today doi.org/10.1016/j.cell… in which an individual with 59 collaborators claims to have tested the information theory of aging
he did not test the information theory of aging
the claim is that he induced dsDNA breaks that are easily repaired, don't cause a DNA damage response or mutagenesis or cell death--only an epigenetic change
he knows this is not true because his co-first author & he published this paper in dec '21
there are a few issues being addressed here. let’s start w safety
human placebo controlled trials have never shown adverse events attributable to Niagen. note that LDL-C is raised in humans w Basis & pterostilbene alone
the class of compounds to which NR belongs is vitamin B3
there are decades of human data on these molecules showing human safety. niacin is unique in causing flushing but nicotinamide was tested in large Australian skin cancer and was shown to be cancer-preventative in ppl
there’s a hierarchy of evidence w human RCTs (and meta-analysis of RCTs) on the top. human case reports & good quality rodent studies are lower. cell studies are lower. poorly conducted rodent and/or poorly conducted cell studies are garbage in/garbage out