[Thread:]

I tweeted that Cardinal Burke, speaking to @Patrick_Coffin, floated the idea that Francis's election was invalid.

Burke's press secretary denies this: .

What's needed is a fuller transcript. Since no one's provided this, I've made one. ...
Before sharing the transcript, a quick note on why I care about this:

There's evidence that the @EWTN empire -- the main news source for Catholics who value doctrinal orthodoxy (it owns @cnalive & @NCRegister) -- treats Francis with a persistent hermeneutic of suspicion. ...
I've written of the EWTN empire's anti-papal bias, e.g. here: . Others have noted it too: catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/12/0…. There are many good people at EWTN and its affiliates; my concern, as I've said, is not with them but with a certain attitude at the top. ...
At @NCRegister, the antipapal bias comes largely via @EdwardPentin. Pentin's close to @StephenBannon & has given him much positive press: . And he wrote a book claiming the Synod on the Family was "rigged." Yet he's @NCRegister's Rome correspondent. ...
It's clear from Pentin's coverage that he, along with his translator @dianemontagna of @LifeSite, is close to Cardinal Burke and Abp. Viganò. When anti-Francis "manifestos" are released, they typically launch simultaneously in Pentin's @NCRegister column and in LifeSite. ...
Which brings us back to Burke and why I'm concerned about what I perceive as his designs vs. Francis.

In June, Pentin and LifeSite broke the "Declaration of Truths" that Burke wrote with four other prelates: ncregister.com/daily-news/new…. One significant item in it escaped notice. ...
Those reporting on the Declaration accurately conveyed that Burke, with his co-authors, clearly purported to teach not _with_ the pope but in _correction_ of what he perceived the pope to be saying. But they overlooked a disturbing section of the document's "Explanatory Note."...
Burke said "each bishop, priest, and lay faithful [had] the moral duty" to declare truths -- the implication being that they should declare _his_ "truths," over and against Francis's teaching authority. And he called for a "movement" to make "private & public" declarations. ...
Yes, that is my reading; others may differ. See the full Explanatory Note here: ncregister.com/images/uploads….

But there's a wealth of evidence Burke is waging an active campaign -- complete with press secretary -- to position himself as a teacher of the faith _against_ the pope. ...
This brings me to Burke's interview for @Patrick_Coffin.

It's well known that Coffin is "red-pilled" on Francis, as he told @TaylorRMarshall: taylormarshall.com/2018/11/182-re….

(Marshall's own "red-pilled" views on Francis are published by an EWTN affiliate: .) ...
Coffin's previous guests on his show include Milo and E. Michael Jones, who found in Coffin a sympathetic ear for his views on what he called @PeteButtigieg's " Jewish mentality." (See commentary here, wherepeteris.com/a-contradictio…, and here, camera.org/article/why-is….) ...
@PeteButtigieg Suffice it to say that in appearing on Coffin's show, Cardinal Burke knew or should have known that he was addressing an audience primed for traditionalist conspiracy theories. And if he didn't know, the questions that Coffin posed to him should have alerted him to that fact. ...
Now, what is the responsible thing for a cardinal to do when asked to comment on theories that the pope isn't the pope?

Should he say, "The conclave was valid"?

Should he say, "It's not prudent to speculate"?

Should he say, "I'm just here to speak on the faith"?...
Or should he say, "I don’t think that I have at hand the facts" & muse that certain "indications" give reason for "great suspicion" of the last conclave?

That's the course Burke took -- seemingly oblivious that his words might push listeners to schism.

Now for the transcript...
Since some complained that my earlier tweets quoted Cardinal Burke out of context, I've transcribed several large sections of his interview for @Patrick_Coffin (source: ). It's important to read Coffin's questions to see what Burke is responding to. ...
At 18:11 (), Coffin calls Francis's papacy a "wincefest," says he has elevated "homosexualist bishops," and asks "whether or not the whole election of Pope Francis might be invalid."

Will Burke, in replying, try to correct any of Coffin's slanders? Nope...
Cardinal Burke accepts the anti-Francis premises in Coffin's question. And he gives an _inconclusive_ reply on whether Francis's election was invalid: "I don’t know. I don’t think that I have at hand the facts -- and they have to be facts, demonstrable facts -- to prove that."...
Coffin follows up suggesting the election was invalid due to pre-conclave politicking ().

@canonlaw said such an argument shows "inexcusable ignorance": canonlawblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/fra…. Surely Burke too will reassure the faithful that Francis is pope?

Nope. ...
@canonlaw Instead of seeking to save listeners from schism, Burke offers "indications" against the validity of the conclave, which, while not conclusive, amount to "a great suspicion" against it. He just "[doesn't] know" if the pope could be proven not to be pope. The jury is still out ...
@canonlaw Coffin then repeats a traditionalist bishop's call for a synod to "resolve" whether the last conclave was valid. And he asks Burke about Antonio Socci's book claiming Benedict is still pope.

Surely Burke will assure listeners that Socci is wrong? Well, almost, but not quite...
@canonlaw Burke reluctantly admits that Socci's claim that the papacy is split between two popes "won't hold water." But as for whether Benedict is still the pope, "the whole matter is a bit confused." And Socci is "an outstanding, ... saintly man," Burke adds; "it merits to read him." ...
@canonlaw That's enough to show Burke is too close to the schismatic rails. Given that @NCRegister, @cnalive, and @EWTN often run stories portraying him as a guardian of orthodoxy (though @cnalive wisely ignored his Declaration of Truths), they owe it to their readers to report on this ...
But will they?

@EWTN shares boardmembers with @NapaInstitute, which just gave Burke a platform for his "Declaration of Truths": ncronline.org/news/people/na…

@RaymondArroyo's whole narrative depends on Burke being right & Francis being wrong.

Pray for Francis. Pray for the Church.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dawn Eden Goldstein: Get the Vaxx/Stop the Spread

Dawn Eden Goldstein: Get the Vaxx/Stop the Spread Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DawnofMercy

16 Mar
@JasonSteidl @BeckySiscoe @FranSzpylczyn I'm sorry that my analogy didn't reflect the love that those with same-sex desire may feel for each other.

I meant only to point out that not every desire is God's best for us.

So I'll address sexual desire directly.

I think we can agree that desire is a personal feeling...
@JasonSteidl @BeckySiscoe @FranSzpylczyn That is, my desire is mine and no one else's; it expresses me.

Love is the deepest desire. And love, to be truly love, can't be merely mental; it must be embodied. That doesn't mean I have to enact it with sexual union--but it does mean I feel it in the deepest part of me. ...
@JasonSteidl @BeckySiscoe @FranSzpylczyn Jesus is our model of love. Jesus loved with his mind, heart, and body. He touched the sick, washed feet, embraced children. He didn't express love through sexual union, but neither did he despise sex; rather, he praised the man and woman who become "one flesh" in marriage. ...
Read 20 tweets
16 Mar
This is the point that is largely ignored. Although the Catholic understanding of sexuality will always engender opposition among many, we would not face the level of outcry that we do today had we emphasized that chastity is for EVERYONE according to their state of life. ...
In that sense, gay people have every right to feel singled out by the Church as though their conduct were uniquely sinful. The pastoral problem of heterosexual couples not knowing what marriage is--or not being willing to accept it--is far more widespread than gay unions. ...
Yet when have you ever heard a homilist speak on what marital love _is_? When have you heard one speak about what marital indissolubility is? Or what it means to be fruitful in marriage--and how it's not only physical but also spiritual (thus possible for infertile couples)?...
Read 17 tweets
15 Mar
I've followed Pope Francis's writings & speeches from his papal election, written a chapter on his theology in my SThD dissertation, and written a book on his spirituality (see avemariapress.com/products/my-pe…). So this news from his Vatican is no surprise to me:
press.vatican.va/content/salast…
Those expressing shock that Francis approved the CDF's denial of blessings to same-sex unions are people who haven't read Amoris laetitia (which the CDF response cites twice). They likewise haven't read Francis's book on mercy (see firstthings.com/web-exclusives…). ...
To put it simply, they are unaware that Francis's spirituality of mercy is founded upon a sharp and realistic understanding of our need for mercy--in other words, our need to repent of our sins (see firstthings.com/web-exclusives…). ...
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar
Thread:

With CDs disappearing, it's hard to explain to people what I did as a rock historian writing liner notes--the booklets that came with CDs & told the artist's history. So I was elated to discover that @internetarchive is now archiving CDs complete with liner notes. ...
The depth and breadth of @internetarchive's CD collection particularly amazes me. It includes some of the most obscure works that I was involved with. Following is a taste of some of my writings that you'll find in the liner notes held in the archive:
One of my first liner-note essays was for this fantastic #IrmaThomas CD in 1992, when I was 23. The Soul Queen of New Orleans granted me an interview & was terrifically gracious. She had an excellent memory, answering all my Q's in detail. I was in awe. archive.org/details/cd_tim…
Read 11 tweets
28 Feb
This is not a superficial question. The Catechism says "God's parental tenderness can also be expressed by the image of motherhood." But nowhere in Jewish or Christian sacred scripture does it say God _is_ Mother in the way that he is Father. Jesus calls God Father & He/Him.
Pope Benedict XVI has a beautiful audience in which he speaks of how important it is, in speaking of God as Father, to purify the term from negative associations, "because today the father figure...all too often is not sufficiently positive in daily life."
vatican.va/content/benedi…
Only after weighing in on @FrMatthewLC's tweet did I learn that today's online conversation on using male pronouns for God was sparked by an uproar from traditionalists against Vickey McBride, who directs campus ministry at a Cristo Rey high school. ...
Read 13 tweets
28 Feb
@MRibnek I've discovered a few things that may be of interest about this "Veritatis Splendor" community that Bishop Strickland is planning in collaboration with Regina Caeli Academy.

First, I've heard from several sources that Frank J. Hanna III gives support to Strickland. ...
@MRibnek I wrote about Hanna on @Where_Peter_is: wherepeteris.com/catholic-found…. George Weigel calls him a "stalwart Georgia Republican." He made his millions selling subprime credit cards to poor folks; when feds came calling, he paid $114M in restitution. ...
@MRibnek @Where_Peter_is As I wrote in @Where_Peter_is, Hanna donates through his Solidarity Association. After my exposé, Solidarity's website erased info on its grantees. But via @waybackmachine you can see how Solidarity formerly listed its support for Regina Caeli ... web.archive.org/web/2020113017…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(