Amitav Ghosh Profile picture
Aug 15, 2019 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Thread: The @nytimes' superb articles on slavery & capitalism made me doubly glad to receive this excellent new study of another commodity that was foundational to modern capitalism: opium, produced under duress in the narco-state that was British India. 1/4
Rolf Bauer's book is the first overview of opium production across India. He shows that Indian farmers were forced to produce opium, at a loss. But the British Raj (& many British, Indian & American merchants) made immense profits, at a terrible human cost for China & SE Asia.2/4
The British Empire was the world's largest narco-state (but not the first, that'd be the Dutch - see below). Many leading US capitalist (and even presidential) families also had their start in opium. This history is essential to today's opioid crisis. 3/4 academic.oup.com/shm/article-ab…
Bauer's book needs to be widely taught in courses on economic & imperial history. There's a price to pay for whitewashing the history of imperialism -Britain is paying it now, with imperial nostalgia & Brexit.
Finally, it was great to see this abt my Ibis Trilogy in the book 4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amitav Ghosh

Amitav Ghosh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GhoshAmitav

Aug 18, 2023
In this ethnographic study of climate change and its impacts on Bangladesh, @CameliaDewan offers a vitally important corrective to simplistic narratives of global warming. 1/n

Thread 👇🏾 Image
‘Climate change’, (cc) Dewan shows, is now often used as a buzzword to attract donor funding for mitigation and resilience. Yet these projects are often based on historically shallow, Eurocentric ideas and misread the landscapes they seek to terraform. The rhetoric of cc ... 2/9
... thus becomes a tool to advance essentially colonial projects of terraformation. The problem is particularly acute in the Bengal delta where a misplaced emphasis on embankments has had many damaging long-term consequences. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Jun 12, 2023
For days I've been riveted by this book, which was recommended by @GKBhambra (thanks!). She is right; this is a milestone! It tells the story of a 17th century Angolan prince who brought a case before the Vatican, detailing the abuses of slavery and seeking to ban the system. 1/4 Image
Mendonca was at the forefront of a pan Atlantic Abolitionist movement that sought equal rights also for Indigenous peoples and 'New Christian' (Jewish converts). This movement far predated British Abolitionism and was initiated and led by Africans. 2/4
Nafafé shows that the idea that there was a slave trade in Africa before the arrival of Europeans is a fiction, invented to justify chattel slavery. "This argument arose in Europe as a perverse strategy to justify the institution of slavery and subsequently colonialism." 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15, 2020
In 1936, Nehru wrote, in a letter to Lord Lothian: 'nothing astonishes me so much as the way the British people manage to combine their material interests with their moral fervour; how they proceed on the irrefutable presumption that they are always doing good to the world...
"... and acting from the highest motives, and trouble and conflict and difficulty are caused by the obstinacy and evil-mindedness of others."

This is why it is so important to remember the rapacious history of the British Empire, and the Anglosphere in general.
Because they believe that when they conquer other countries, it's for their good & their own motives are benevolent. This way of thinking is not dead in the Anglosphere: it is what gave us the liberal-interventionist justifications of the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq etc.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 12, 2019
I've long wanted to write about the historical role of Nepal in India-China-Britain relations in the form of a review of the most important work on the subject (below). Don't think I'll ever get around to it so here's a thread instead. 1/7

sup.org/books/title/?i…
The reason Nepal wasn't gobbled up by the British Empire was because the East India Company didn't want to jeopardize the lucrative trade between British India and China (opium, tea etc.). The Panchen Lama asked the EIC to attack Nepal in 1788, but it refused for this reason. 2/7
Instead the Qianlong Emperor's general, Fuk'anggan, invaded Nepal in 1792/3. Again Lord Cornwallis refused to help the Gurkhas. They were defeated and became tributaries of the Qing dynasty. They also became China's window on the Indian subcontinent. 3/7
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(