David Rothkopf Profile picture
Aug 16, 2019 15 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Here's why I think the Dem race is more wide open than most. (And I begin with the premise that I am not a political professional and one big reason my view might be different is that I am wrong. Also with the disclaimer that I will vote for whomever the Dem nominee is.)
First, Biden's primary advantages have been name recognition and the presumption that he has the best shot at beating Trump.
Next, the name recognition edge will inevitably fade as the campaign continues and leading candidates become better known.
Third, the unique value Biden is perceived to bring as "the one who can beat Trump" is also fading as other candidates become better known. Today each of the top four Dem candidates are seen to beat Trump in the polls...and we are a long way from anyone casting a vote.
Trump will weaken as the economy weakens and as new scandals take place. This will strengthen Dem candidates and thereby diminish the relative advantage offered by Biden.
Other candidates offer significant advantages that Biden can't really compete with. They include the ability to serve two terms (which he can't credibly be seen to do) and strong bases of appeal with key Democratic constituencies.
Biden is also a flawed campaigner, prone to errors. That can't help.

This is not to say, by the way, that Biden will not be the nominee or that he would not be 10000 times better than Trump. He is still the favorite. He is quantum levels better than Trump.
But the point is between now and the primaries, other Dems will be seen as possessing those traits that Biden is perceived to uniquely possess now plus others of their own. Warren, for example, not only has her "plans" but she is running by far the best campaign of all so far.
Other candidates will cut into Biden's large lead with African American voters. And should Bernie continue to fade, that will likely strengthen Warren. In fact, look at the polls and you will see that two-thirds or more of all Dem voters support progressive candidates.
Which is just to say that things change as they have been changing. Look at Warren's amazing swing upward. Look at how she performs in Iowa polls, too. Look at the swift gains Harris enjoyed post the first debate. She has lagged since, but this is a fluid game & she can rebound.
The character of the race will also change as it becomes clearer that only a handful of candidates can win. It may already be down to Biden and Warren. It might be Biden, Warren, Bernie, Harris. A couple others might get a bump--Mayor Pete and Booker lead this group.
The point is that all the articles that discuss this as though it were a done deal or today's realities will remain unchanged are clearly wrong. The race is just starting to get interesting.

But one more thing...
The race to date has also shown that the Dem candidates are a quality field full of people who would be light years better than the current embarrassment in the Oval Office. Further, and perhaps most surprisingly of all, the Dems are running a disciplined race.
Minor spats aside they are focused on beating Trump, on new ideas and on showing the clear differences between the Democratic and Republican parities. They are not succumbing to the temptation to fragment. They are all committed to victory in 2020.
That wasn't a sure thing six months ago. But the resolve of the party to do what it takes to save America from the Trump debacle is admirable and it is paying dividends.

Of course, the biggest of all those will come when Trump is defeated. But for now, we know one thing:
The Dems will do their best to ensure that they produce not only the best candidate to beat Trump but someone who can be a great president of the United States and undo the grievous damage the Trump-McConnell team have done.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Jun 13, 2023
I, for one, am a bit surprised at the general acceptance of the degree of deference that has been shown to Trump in this case. He was given far too much time and too many chances to return the documents he stole from the government.
As the subsequent seizure of the documents revealed, they were extremely sensitive in nature and put our national security at risk every moment they were held by Trump in the insecure locations he kept them or were referred to by him in meetings with visitors and associates.
Consequently, the deference could well have been deeply damaging. Similarly, if he was hiding documents at Mar-a-Lago it stands to reason some might have been at his many other residences. Why were they not searched? A normal person would not have received such a courtesy.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 11, 2023
The book on how to indict an ex-president has not been written--until now. Chapter One was by Alvin Bragg. Ch. Two was by Jack Smith, informed by Chapter One. Ch. Three, likely by Fani Willis, will be informed by the other two experiences. So by the time we get to Ch. Four...
which is probably the most consequential of the cases, about how Trump led an insurrection against the US government and a systematic effort to defraud American voters, there will be quite a lot to draw on, to help get each element right.
What is more, the shock factor will have been degraded quite a bit. The pearl clutching of Trump's supporters will be even less credible. There arguments that somehow Trump is being wronged will appear dramatically weaker (and they appear pretty darn weak now.)
Read 6 tweets
Jun 6, 2023
I regularly go through a debate in my mind about who is worse at their jobs, sports show analysts or political pundits. (You would think weather forecasters might be included in the mix, but the reality is that their predictions are vastly better than the other two groups.)
With the sports analysts, the level of BS is just shameless. Day-in and day-out they speak with great conviction, some of them banging the table or shouting at their guests or audiences, asserting they know what's going to happen next in one sports event or another.
And then when they're wrong they just move right on to a new equally certain prediction. And they do this week in and week out and they are wrong a lot. "I guarantee you Team X will sweep the series." "Of course, Team X lost game 1. The coach blew it...
Read 13 tweets
Jun 2, 2023
This debt deal will rank with the most significant legislative accomplishments of Biden's first term. In a situation that should not have happened, created by his opponents, with immense stakes, he and his team produced the best possible outcome for the country.
Like so many other Biden accomplishments-from the rescue package to the infra bill, from the inflation reduction act to the CHIPs act-Biden was underestimated, he achieved progress despite his opponents' obstructionism, he didn't play media games & let the work speak for itself.
Many scoffed and said he was out of touch when he spoke during the campaign of seeking bipartisanship and compromise wherever it was possible and consistent with his core principles and objectives. And again and again and again he has achieved it.
Read 9 tweets
May 31, 2023
I’m one of those crazy progressives who think supporting the most progressive president in roughly six decades is progressive, who thinks avoiding an economic disaster that would leave millions of the most vulnerable among us suffering.
I’m one of the woke mind virus sufferers who thinks progressive doesn’t mean letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, who thinks maintaining power is the key to advancing progressive goals.
I think protecting the progressive Biden agenda and initiatives of the past couple years from draconian cuts is progressive, that backing the one political leader who can defeat the enemies of democracy is progressive.
Read 5 tweets
May 30, 2023
Stealthily, without proportionate recognition, Joe Biden is not just having a good presidency, he's having one that is historic in its concrete achievements and successes. The fair & balanced types in the media won't characterize it fairly because to do so, would "feel" biased.
The opposition won't cover it because it is not in their interests to tell the truth. (It's why they never do.) Editors and producers will shy away from it because positive stories don't sell like conflict does. Consequently most of the media won't present the simple facts.
It should be said, Biden uses the lack coverage to his advantage. He let's the crazies & the partisans and the weathervane pundits and the people who have forgotten that the first job of journalists is to report the truth as it is, as a kind of shield while he just does his job.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(