David Rothkopf Profile picture
Aug 16, 2019 15 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Here's why I think the Dem race is more wide open than most. (And I begin with the premise that I am not a political professional and one big reason my view might be different is that I am wrong. Also with the disclaimer that I will vote for whomever the Dem nominee is.)
First, Biden's primary advantages have been name recognition and the presumption that he has the best shot at beating Trump.
Next, the name recognition edge will inevitably fade as the campaign continues and leading candidates become better known.
Third, the unique value Biden is perceived to bring as "the one who can beat Trump" is also fading as other candidates become better known. Today each of the top four Dem candidates are seen to beat Trump in the polls...and we are a long way from anyone casting a vote.
Trump will weaken as the economy weakens and as new scandals take place. This will strengthen Dem candidates and thereby diminish the relative advantage offered by Biden.
Other candidates offer significant advantages that Biden can't really compete with. They include the ability to serve two terms (which he can't credibly be seen to do) and strong bases of appeal with key Democratic constituencies.
Biden is also a flawed campaigner, prone to errors. That can't help.

This is not to say, by the way, that Biden will not be the nominee or that he would not be 10000 times better than Trump. He is still the favorite. He is quantum levels better than Trump.
But the point is between now and the primaries, other Dems will be seen as possessing those traits that Biden is perceived to uniquely possess now plus others of their own. Warren, for example, not only has her "plans" but she is running by far the best campaign of all so far.
Other candidates will cut into Biden's large lead with African American voters. And should Bernie continue to fade, that will likely strengthen Warren. In fact, look at the polls and you will see that two-thirds or more of all Dem voters support progressive candidates.
Which is just to say that things change as they have been changing. Look at Warren's amazing swing upward. Look at how she performs in Iowa polls, too. Look at the swift gains Harris enjoyed post the first debate. She has lagged since, but this is a fluid game & she can rebound.
The character of the race will also change as it becomes clearer that only a handful of candidates can win. It may already be down to Biden and Warren. It might be Biden, Warren, Bernie, Harris. A couple others might get a bump--Mayor Pete and Booker lead this group.
The point is that all the articles that discuss this as though it were a done deal or today's realities will remain unchanged are clearly wrong. The race is just starting to get interesting.

But one more thing...
The race to date has also shown that the Dem candidates are a quality field full of people who would be light years better than the current embarrassment in the Oval Office. Further, and perhaps most surprisingly of all, the Dems are running a disciplined race.
Minor spats aside they are focused on beating Trump, on new ideas and on showing the clear differences between the Democratic and Republican parities. They are not succumbing to the temptation to fragment. They are all committed to victory in 2020.
That wasn't a sure thing six months ago. But the resolve of the party to do what it takes to save America from the Trump debacle is admirable and it is paying dividends.

Of course, the biggest of all those will come when Trump is defeated. But for now, we know one thing:
The Dems will do their best to ensure that they produce not only the best candidate to beat Trump but someone who can be a great president of the United States and undo the grievous damage the Trump-McConnell team have done.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Jul 10
The recent discussion about Biden has gone through phases. The first was about the debate performance. The second was about whether that was a signal of potential problems to come. But we are now in a third phase which turns more fears about the state of the campaign.
These concerns are largely from political professionals (not commentators). They turn not just on setbacks since the debate but on the fact that the campaign was seemingly spinning its wheels even beforehand. I sense a bunch of it is from worried folks down the ballot.
These conversations seem to be continuing despite Biden's repeated statements that he is definitely running and in it for the long haul and have not been helped by recent polling data, the Cook Report downgrade of Dem battleground prospects, etc.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 6
It's pretty clear. Biden is standing for, believes in and still fights for the values that led Americans to the beaches of Normandy 80 years ago. And Trump and the MAGA movement oppose and seek to undermine all those values.
Trump is on the wrong side in the struggle that caused World War II. He is on the side of fascism. Of the enemy. He derogates our heroes. He seeks to undo the gains we made by winning that war. He attacks our allies and our alliances. He supports our enemies.
Trump had a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed. Trump's own cabinet members said he defended Hitler. Watching the 80th Anniversary of D-Day commemorations we should try to understand the full implications of Trump & MAGA in the context of WWII and the last century.
Read 7 tweets
May 25
In traveling through Eastern and Central Europe, the level of despair and palpable fear that Trump may return to office is off-the-charts. A Trump victory is seen as a win for Putin and the beginning of a new round of tectonic changes in the structure of Europe.
In some countries along Russia's borders or near to them, the prospect of a Trump enabled defeat in Ukraine, a weakening of NATO and tacit or explicit U.S. support for Putin and his proxies spells real trouble for democracy and the balance of influence on the continent.
Many express utter disbelief that the voters of America could make such a mistake and put so much that America has been working for during the past century in peril. I try to offer cogent reasons why a Biden victory is more likely than Trump redux.
Read 4 tweets
May 25
The mistake too many inside and out of the administration make is thinking that Netanyahu is a just a difficult ally, even a very difficult one. He is not an ally. He is, in fact, an enemy of America's goals, interests, and values as well as a political foe of President Biden.
Israel is our friend. Peace in the region is our goal. Security, self-determination and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians alike is the only way to that goal. Netanyahu, like Hamas, actively opposes that goal and seeks to make it impossible.
Hamas and Netanyahu are not the same, of course. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Netanyahu is a rogue wannabe autocrat who has with a band of extremists hijacked a democratic government and serially abused the trust of its people and its neighbors.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 13, 2023
I, for one, am a bit surprised at the general acceptance of the degree of deference that has been shown to Trump in this case. He was given far too much time and too many chances to return the documents he stole from the government.
As the subsequent seizure of the documents revealed, they were extremely sensitive in nature and put our national security at risk every moment they were held by Trump in the insecure locations he kept them or were referred to by him in meetings with visitors and associates.
Consequently, the deference could well have been deeply damaging. Similarly, if he was hiding documents at Mar-a-Lago it stands to reason some might have been at his many other residences. Why were they not searched? A normal person would not have received such a courtesy.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 11, 2023
The book on how to indict an ex-president has not been written--until now. Chapter One was by Alvin Bragg. Ch. Two was by Jack Smith, informed by Chapter One. Ch. Three, likely by Fani Willis, will be informed by the other two experiences. So by the time we get to Ch. Four...
which is probably the most consequential of the cases, about how Trump led an insurrection against the US government and a systematic effort to defraud American voters, there will be quite a lot to draw on, to help get each element right.
What is more, the shock factor will have been degraded quite a bit. The pearl clutching of Trump's supporters will be even less credible. There arguments that somehow Trump is being wronged will appear dramatically weaker (and they appear pretty darn weak now.)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(