Here's why I think the Dem race is more wide open than most. (And I begin with the premise that I am not a political professional and one big reason my view might be different is that I am wrong. Also with the disclaimer that I will vote for whomever the Dem nominee is.)
First, Biden's primary advantages have been name recognition and the presumption that he has the best shot at beating Trump.
Next, the name recognition edge will inevitably fade as the campaign continues and leading candidates become better known.
Third, the unique value Biden is perceived to bring as "the one who can beat Trump" is also fading as other candidates become better known. Today each of the top four Dem candidates are seen to beat Trump in the polls...and we are a long way from anyone casting a vote.
Trump will weaken as the economy weakens and as new scandals take place. This will strengthen Dem candidates and thereby diminish the relative advantage offered by Biden.
Other candidates offer significant advantages that Biden can't really compete with. They include the ability to serve two terms (which he can't credibly be seen to do) and strong bases of appeal with key Democratic constituencies.
Biden is also a flawed campaigner, prone to errors. That can't help.
This is not to say, by the way, that Biden will not be the nominee or that he would not be 10000 times better than Trump. He is still the favorite. He is quantum levels better than Trump.
But the point is between now and the primaries, other Dems will be seen as possessing those traits that Biden is perceived to uniquely possess now plus others of their own. Warren, for example, not only has her "plans" but she is running by far the best campaign of all so far.
Other candidates will cut into Biden's large lead with African American voters. And should Bernie continue to fade, that will likely strengthen Warren. In fact, look at the polls and you will see that two-thirds or more of all Dem voters support progressive candidates.
Which is just to say that things change as they have been changing. Look at Warren's amazing swing upward. Look at how she performs in Iowa polls, too. Look at the swift gains Harris enjoyed post the first debate. She has lagged since, but this is a fluid game & she can rebound.
The character of the race will also change as it becomes clearer that only a handful of candidates can win. It may already be down to Biden and Warren. It might be Biden, Warren, Bernie, Harris. A couple others might get a bump--Mayor Pete and Booker lead this group.
The point is that all the articles that discuss this as though it were a done deal or today's realities will remain unchanged are clearly wrong. The race is just starting to get interesting.
But one more thing...
The race to date has also shown that the Dem candidates are a quality field full of people who would be light years better than the current embarrassment in the Oval Office. Further, and perhaps most surprisingly of all, the Dems are running a disciplined race.
Minor spats aside they are focused on beating Trump, on new ideas and on showing the clear differences between the Democratic and Republican parities. They are not succumbing to the temptation to fragment. They are all committed to victory in 2020.
That wasn't a sure thing six months ago. But the resolve of the party to do what it takes to save America from the Trump debacle is admirable and it is paying dividends.
Of course, the biggest of all those will come when Trump is defeated. But for now, we know one thing:
The Dems will do their best to ensure that they produce not only the best candidate to beat Trump but someone who can be a great president of the United States and undo the grievous damage the Trump-McConnell team have done.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every single time you engage in the delusion that Trump has a "policy position" on traditional issues you normalize him. Trump has no beliefs, no traditional policy views. For him, policies are like his blue suit & dumb long red ties, a costume he wears to hide who he really is.
He is a terrorist calling himself a freedom fighter. This election is not about his tax policy versus that of Kamala Harris, even if he has proposals in that area. It is about the fact that he is a criminal, a traitor, a fraudster, a liar, the worst president in our history...
...a terrible human being who seeks to reward himself & his friends at the expense of everyone else. Everything he does is first and foremost about what is in it for him and occasionally for his supporters (because he needs to pay them off to get what he wants for himself.)
Given the number of ways that a candidate can communicate directly with voters--the relevance and wisdom of doing so through intermediaries who will filter the news and who often will bend it to suit other agendas has diminished. That seems reasonable to me.
The argument that the press is the objective presenter of facts has been weakened as virtually all media seek to adjust their presentation of content to suit business or political objectives. There are fewer and fewer journalists who can be relied upon to seek objective truth.
Too many are compromised not only by the agenda of their company's owners but by their own history of access journalism or sensationalism or focusing on the trending rather than the important story. They howl at being ignored or bypassed. But they share some of the blame.
The argument that Harris is somehow not speaking enough to the press is ridiculous on several levels: 1.) She actually does speak to the press, 2.) She has been visible constantly since she became the candidate, 3.) She has been clear and detailed about all her policy goals.
4.) She has been readily available to the press for four years. There are few questions about her that have not already been asked and answered. 5.) The goal of the campaign is for her to communicate with voters. So far, they seem to have responded well to what she has said.
6.) Her opponent is actually not campaigning, is primarily speaking to patsies in the press when he does speak to the media, and lies constantly so it doesn't matter what he is asked because he won't answer truthfully.
Folks, if you want a US policy toward Israel and Gaza that is more focused on relieving the suffering the people of Gaza and achieving a lasting, just peace, disrupting the campaign of the one person most likely to deliver that is a bad idea. Especially when...
...she has indicated a willingness to meet with groups that share your views. She may not agree with all of your ideas and suggestions. But she is by far your best and only legitimate hope of change and weakening her is a crazily self-destructive process.
You may not like this reality. But you would like the alternatives--Trump or the status quo--much much much less. You may not feel you can wait for our political processes to work out...but frankly, there is no alternative choice that is available or possible.
To all the geniuses who feel Harris should have picked Shapiro to "win Pennsylvania" I ask, um, when was the last time that was the reason a VP was picked? (Hint: It is seldom if ever the reason a VP candidate was picked.)
Here, let me do some quick math for you. Biden certainly didn't pick Harris to win a contested state. Trump picked neither Vance nor Pence to win contested states. HRC picked Tim Kaine to help in Va., that's true, and he helped. It was an outlier.
Do you think McCain picked Palin to win Alaska? Edwards did not help Kerry win North Carolina. Did Cheney get picked to help Bush in Montana? No. How about Lieberman to help Gore in Connecticut. No. Clinton did win Al Gore's home state of Tennessee...
The recent discussion about Biden has gone through phases. The first was about the debate performance. The second was about whether that was a signal of potential problems to come. But we are now in a third phase which turns more fears about the state of the campaign.
These concerns are largely from political professionals (not commentators). They turn not just on setbacks since the debate but on the fact that the campaign was seemingly spinning its wheels even beforehand. I sense a bunch of it is from worried folks down the ballot.
These conversations seem to be continuing despite Biden's repeated statements that he is definitely running and in it for the long haul and have not been helped by recent polling data, the Cook Report downgrade of Dem battleground prospects, etc.