Mika McKinnon Profile picture
Aug 17, 2019 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🎶 One of these things is not like the others
One of these things just doesn't belong🎶
Possibly the best thing about our solar system is that you could pick ANY PLANET as your oddball & be right.
Mercury: dead-on straight up, 0° tilt
Venus: sloooowwwwww
Earth & Mars: why the fuck are they so matchy-matchy?!
Jupiter: hefty enough it doesn’t orbit the sun; it co-orbits
Saturn: that tidy rotation speed? Not true for the whole planet
Uranus: sideways
Neptune: overly wobbly
Even measuring daily rotation of gas giants is a nightmare (because clouds), but Saturn is a bonus jackass of secrecy in aligned rotation & magnetic axes thwarting usual tricks.
*Venus: sloooowwww & backwards?!

Q: What about Pluto?!

A: Pluto orbits the Sun. Aside from that, EVERYTHING is weird:

1. Highly elliptical orbit (0.25)
2. Highly inclined orbit (17°)
3. Co-orbits Charon as a binary system (SO COOL! gizmodo.com/pluto-is-somet…)
4. Sideways Orbital diagram of all planets plus Pluto, overlaid with the text “go home Pluto, you’re drunk”
When I was a kid, I thought scientists had a handle on Why Planets. Exoplanets broke our formation theories, but we’d fix it.

Now I spend time marvelling that we say all this shit like we’re confident on what’s happening when really, who the fuck knows what’s inside Neptune??
Even more weirdness:
Mercury: day longer than year; warped spacetime of sun means you need to account for general relativity in its orbit

Venus: day & year are virtually the same length

Earth: big-ass moon is yanking on us so hard we’re slowing down to match it (eventually)
Q: Wait, what defines “up” & “flat” &&& ...?

A: This is delightfully complicated.

Sun defines center, its N pole points up.

Earth’s orbits defines an ecliptic plane that’s 7° from Sun’s equator.

Axial tilt is PER PLANET mismatch between orbit & rotation vs idealized 90°
Bonus confusion:
We sometimes use a different Earth-centric coordinate system to say where things are in the sky when we’re hanging out on our home planet.

The celestial equator is our equator projected into the sky, 23° mismatched from the ecliptic because that’s our axial tilt
And if we go looking at our whole Milky Way Galaxy? Our whole solar system is tipped 63° off-kilter.

Up is wherever the fuck we feel like pointing for this coordinate system & don’t stress too much because we’ll transform to a new one in a moment.
Most of planets are pointing & spinning in vaguely the same direction because of conservation of angular momentum*.

Mercury is the well-behaved child; all the other planets got in fights.

* probably. Look, we REALLY broke planet formation with exoplanets. Everything’s in flux.
But wait!

The terrestrial planets & gas giants have magnetic fields that mostly align with their rotational axis: compasses point roughly to geographic north.

But the ice giants Neptune & Uranus? Hahaha nope, they’re like 40-60° off.

Why?
Eh... it’d be cool to figure out? Diagrams of rotation axis vs magnetic axis for Neptune and Uranus
It pleases me that if Pluto is joining the planetary crowd, so is Ceres. Can't pick & chose your dwarf planets, yo!

(Also: I so want Eris to join the crew, but although we think a day is just under 26 hours long we don't actually know its tilt...)
Q: Hey, why is Venus rotating backwards in the first animation, but upside-down in the second?

A: Venus is rotating exactly the same in both, it's just a matter of how you're thinking about "Which way is up?" when trying to describe our wacky lil solar system.

Planets are weird
Q: Surely we at least know our own planet really, really well, right?!

A: About that... we're still figuring out what's going on below the surface. Geophysics! It's an adventure.
nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/0…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mika McKinnon

Mika McKinnon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mikamckinnon

Dec 26, 2021
The degree of rage I feel when someone flippantly declares getting COVID is inevitable and we should give up is beyond my ability to politely express.

It’s never too late to make things less bad. Like Climate nihilism, it’s self-destructive bullshit & I have no tolerance for it.
Science is an astonishing tool linking cause and effect, enabling us to create a path to any future we want.

It’s not easy! Untangling details can be lifetimes of effort to get right. But the harder part is picking a future, then doing the work.
It’s daunting. We need to do the work individually, but we also need our communities, governments, & everyone everywhere else to do the work.

But if we refuse to surrender to suffering?
If we keep struggling to do better?

We have infinite possible futures that are less bad.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9, 2021
You know the rules:

Most vibrantly-coloured rocks are on the Do Not Lick list, but ALL rocks that are literally radiating are definitely on the Do Not Lick list.
> Record scratch

> Freeze frame of you, the protagonist, contemplating the pros and cons of licking a plutonium puck.

“You’re probably wondering how I got here. It all started when I was strolling around France...”

#YouFindARock.

📷 Roberto Bosi Densely-packed crystals of a pale translucent tan spackled a
You pick up the hunk of densely-packed quartz crystals, intrigued by the spatters of matte black.

“Did you mould?!” you ask the rock incredulously. “No, no, that’s not quite right... what IS this?”

>
Read 15 tweets
Nov 21, 2020
I’m reading a lot of well-intentioned articles that make it clear how many scicomm peeps have no idea disaster risk reduction is a deep field with a lot of research into effective communication.

ProTip: Using fear & shame as motivation backfires when applied to public health.
I can’t write this article (or even thread!) right now as I’m under medical orders to drop my stress levels (ahahahahasob), but...

If you’re writing well-intentioned pieces trying to influence pandemic behaviour, please take some cues from disaster sociology research. It exists!
Fundamental premise:
Vanishingly few people make active choices they believe will endanger themselves or the people they love.

If they’re making “bad” choices, it’s a fundamentally different risk perception. Until you understand how & why, your argument will miss its audience.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 20, 2020
Gritty has found rocks.

They are all safe but boring to lick. It’s a solid selection of common crystals from a rock shop or museum gift store.

I do have a few questions.
If you go outside and pick up a stray rock, it’s probably quartz.

This looks like quartz. Quartz is an excellent oscillator that is piezoelectric & resonates well.

White sand is also quartz, and is near oceans.

Conclusion: Gritty can use quartz as a distributed spy network.
I have questions on this ID.

If it’s rose quartz, it’s about as fun as licking a window for flavour.

But it could easily be pink halite (like Himalayan rock salt!). If it is...? Lick it! Lick it moar!
Read 7 tweets
Nov 19, 2020
I’m stunned that we’re losing Arecibo.

Even if you don’t pay much attention to ground-based astronomy, you know this telescope from pop culture & movies. It’s somewhere special. nature.com/articles/d4158…
This article from just before the closing announcement is fantastic for the context of why Arecibo is so unique:
space.com/arecibo-observ…
I just...

I know we’ve got a lot going on, especially with the mass casualty event scheduled shortly after US Thanksgiving.

But take some time to read the Arecibo tributes as they come out. They won’t be cheerful. But they’ll be heartfelt.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 14, 2020
Irregular reminder that landslides can behave like fluids.

(Thank you for all the pings!)
Landslides get weird when there really big, and can start behaving more like fluids than solids once they’re over the half million cubic meter mark.

...which was pretty much why I wrote a thesis once upon a time: io9.gizmodo.com/why-are-huge-l…
But technically landslide are fluid-like, not fluids.

Why?

Because they’re a mixed mess of materials that act differently when moving than when still. You can’t just sample a tree trunk, some peat, and water to figure out the rheologic properties (how it flows).
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(