Possibly the best thing about our solar system is that you could pick ANY PLANET as your oddball & be right.
Mercury: dead-on straight up, 0° tilt
Venus: sloooowwwwww
Earth & Mars: why the fuck are they so matchy-matchy?!
Jupiter: hefty enough it doesn’t orbit the sun; it co-orbits
Saturn: that tidy rotation speed? Not true for the whole planet
Uranus: sideways
Neptune: overly wobbly
Even measuring daily rotation of gas giants is a nightmare (because clouds), but Saturn is a bonus jackass of secrecy in aligned rotation & magnetic axes thwarting usual tricks.
*Venus: sloooowwww & backwards?!
Q: What about Pluto?!
A: Pluto orbits the Sun. Aside from that, EVERYTHING is weird:
1. Highly elliptical orbit (0.25) 2. Highly inclined orbit (17°) 3. Co-orbits Charon as a binary system (SO COOL! gizmodo.com/pluto-is-somet…) 4. Sideways
When I was a kid, I thought scientists had a handle on Why Planets. Exoplanets broke our formation theories, but we’d fix it.
Now I spend time marvelling that we say all this shit like we’re confident on what’s happening when really, who the fuck knows what’s inside Neptune??
Even more weirdness:
Mercury: day longer than year; warped spacetime of sun means you need to account for general relativity in its orbit
Venus: day & year are virtually the same length
Earth: big-ass moon is yanking on us so hard we’re slowing down to match it (eventually)
Q: Wait, what defines “up” & “flat” &&& ...?
A: This is delightfully complicated.
Sun defines center, its N pole points up.
Earth’s orbits defines an ecliptic plane that’s 7° from Sun’s equator.
Axial tilt is PER PLANET mismatch between orbit & rotation vs idealized 90°
Bonus confusion:
We sometimes use a different Earth-centric coordinate system to say where things are in the sky when we’re hanging out on our home planet.
The celestial equator is our equator projected into the sky, 23° mismatched from the ecliptic because that’s our axial tilt
And if we go looking at our whole Milky Way Galaxy? Our whole solar system is tipped 63° off-kilter.
Up is wherever the fuck we feel like pointing for this coordinate system & don’t stress too much because we’ll transform to a new one in a moment.
Most of planets are pointing & spinning in vaguely the same direction because of conservation of angular momentum*.
Mercury is the well-behaved child; all the other planets got in fights.
* probably. Look, we REALLY broke planet formation with exoplanets. Everything’s in flux.
But wait!
The terrestrial planets & gas giants have magnetic fields that mostly align with their rotational axis: compasses point roughly to geographic north.
But the ice giants Neptune & Uranus? Hahaha nope, they’re like 40-60° off.
Why?
Eh... it’d be cool to figure out?
It pleases me that if Pluto is joining the planetary crowd, so is Ceres. Can't pick & chose your dwarf planets, yo!
(Also: I so want Eris to join the crew, but although we think a day is just under 26 hours long we don't actually know its tilt...)
Q: Hey, why is Venus rotating backwards in the first animation, but upside-down in the second?
A: Venus is rotating exactly the same in both, it's just a matter of how you're thinking about "Which way is up?" when trying to describe our wacky lil solar system.
Planets are weird
Q: Surely we at least know our own planet really, really well, right?!
I’m reading a lot of well-intentioned articles that make it clear how many scicomm peeps have no idea disaster risk reduction is a deep field with a lot of research into effective communication.
ProTip: Using fear & shame as motivation backfires when applied to public health.
I can’t write this article (or even thread!) right now as I’m under medical orders to drop my stress levels (ahahahahasob), but...
If you’re writing well-intentioned pieces trying to influence pandemic behaviour, please take some cues from disaster sociology research. It exists!
Fundamental premise:
Vanishingly few people make active choices they believe will endanger themselves or the people they love.
If they’re making “bad” choices, it’s a fundamentally different risk perception. Until you understand how & why, your argument will miss its audience.
Even if you don’t pay much attention to ground-based astronomy, you know this telescope from pop culture & movies. It’s somewhere special. nature.com/articles/d4158…
This article from just before the closing announcement is fantastic for the context of why Arecibo is so unique: space.com/arecibo-observ…
I just...
I know we’ve got a lot going on, especially with the mass casualty event scheduled shortly after US Thanksgiving.
But take some time to read the Arecibo tributes as they come out. They won’t be cheerful. But they’ll be heartfelt.
But technically landslide are fluid-like, not fluids.
Why?
Because they’re a mixed mess of materials that act differently when moving than when still. You can’t just sample a tree trunk, some peat, and water to figure out the rheologic properties (how it flows).