Glenn Kirschner Profile picture
Aug 17, 2019 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
This is absurd. Executive privilege covers (some) communications between the president and his executive branch advisors. It DOES NOT cover conversations with Lewandowski, who had no position with the administration. It does not apply to a president’s conversations with . . .
2. a private citizen. Moreover, it does not apply to conversations in which a president tells someone to obstruct justice. This is just as frivolous as someone trying to invoke a doctor-patient privilege even though neither person in the conversation is a doctor. Or . . .
3. trying to invoke an attorney - client privilege when neither person in the conversation is an attorney. Let’s call this what it is - a coverup designed to prevent Trump’s crimes from being exposed to the American people via Congressional testimony.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Kirschner

Glenn Kirschner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glennkirschner2

Jan 27
Morning friends. The result in the 2nd E. Jean Carroll case is important foreshadowing for Trump’s upcoming criminal trials. When cases move from the court of public opinion into courts of law, Trump loses. He lost the NY civil fraud trial (we’re awaiting Judge Engoron’s …
decision on how much Trump will have to pay). He lost BOTH E. Jean Carroll cases. And let’s face it, he lost (by proxy) the case brought by DA Bragg when Trump’s namesake - the Trump Organization - AND his CFO Allen Weisselberg were convicted for a 15-year-long …
criminal scheme to defraud in the first degree. Here’s the thing: the rules of evidence don’t apply in the court of public opinion. So Trump lies every day in his desperate attempt to continue to deceive & grift from his ever-shrinking gaggle of supporters. But …
Read 6 tweets
Dec 23, 2023
Unfortunately, we currently have a Supreme Court that seems determined to revoke or contract (rather than expand) human rights, civil rights, and equal rights. And when you couple this with the recent revelations about the obscenely lavish gifts and financial favors provided by
Republicans billionaires, which were undisclosed/unreported/concealed by members of the court, we are in the darkest of times for the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. With that said, the Supreme Court DID refuse to accept review of all of Trump’s BS election challenge cases in
the aftermath of his 2020 election loss. And now, the Supreme Court has refused to grant Special Counsel’s request to review (on an accelerated basis) Trump’s BS claim that a president can commit any and all crimes while in office with absolute immunity from prosecution. IF the
Read 7 tweets
Dec 10, 2022
Let’s address the travesty of the DISMISSAL of the case against MBS brought by the family of murdered WAPO columnist Jamal Khashoggi:

1. MBS -the crown prince of Saudi Arabia - “approved” the murder of Washington post columnist Jamal Khashoggi because Khashoggi was criticizing
the Saudi government, so …
2. Khashoggi’s family sued MBS in US federal court. Then …
3. MBS raised something called “head-of-state immunity,” which stands for the proposition that you can’t sue a foreign head of state while he/she is in office. Only problem was …
4. MBS was NOT head of state, so …
5. Six days before a court hearing in the Khashoggi case …
6. MBS’s father, King Salmon, made his son Prime Minister, & hence, head of state. And, perhaps the worst part…
Read 7 tweets
Nov 16, 2022
As defendant Thomas Caldwell concludes his testimony in the Oath Keepers trial, a few overarching observations: the 2 defendants who have testified thus far - Caldwell and Elmer Stewart Rhodes - bear many similarities. They come across as pompous, self-important, egocentric,
hateful individuals. Their testimony is, at times laughably unworthy of belief. Example: when Caldwell was advocating violence against his perceived enemies, he disavowed his own written statements by saying he was just quoting language from a video game named “Call of Duty.”
On cross-examination, Caldwell admitted he knew little about the video game, never really played it, but added, ‘well, you can Google Call of Duty and find things about it there.’ Caldwell was confronted w/ his written communications about “transporting heavy weapons”
Read 7 tweets
Nov 14, 2022
There are some curious tactical decisions being made by some of the defense attorneys in the Oath Keepers case. For example, defendant Caldwell’s attorney called a witness, Joseph Godbold, who is Caldwell’s friend and occasional employee on home improvement projects.
His testimony was offered to portray Caldwell as suffering from physical and health challenges, being unable to climb ladders, needing to walk with a cane at times, etc. The point seemed to be defendant Caldwell wasn’t fit enough to storm the Capitol. On cross-examination,
we learned that the witness had been banned from Facebook. Before being banned he posted things like, “f**k Biden and cameltoe, they will never be my president,” “it will take martial law and a miracle for Trump to remain president,” & things about Mike Pence I won’t repeat here.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 31, 2022
Cooperating witness/former Oath Keeper Graydon Young is now testifying. He said he “unfortunately” spent 2-6 hours a day on right-wing social media sites and came to believe the election was stolen. So he joined the Oath keepers organization because “marches and protests
weren’t enough.” They needed to do something more “”forceful.” He said as part of the Oath Keepers, he attended an earlier protest in DC to provide security for Roger Stone (though he said he had no training or experience in security, there was no security plan & he had no idea
what he was doing). But he perceptively related the following: “I met Roger Stone. I wasn’t really impressed. He doesn’t have any political power, but he thinks he does.” Young testified that he sought to have the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys work together for some
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(