Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Matt Parker Profile picture
@standupmaths
Aug 17, 2019 • 4 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
It’s been a good night. Image
And… done. Image
#currentmood Image
Photo features: me, @emma_mean, @WestMagic and @ZoeLGriffiths. Also: maths.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Matt Parker

Matt Parker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @standupmaths

Matt Parker Profile picture
Nov 14, 2020
6 ÷ 2(1+2) is going viral again. And the correct answer from a mathematician is “you need to write this better so it’s not ambiguous”.

PEMDAS/BODMAS is not some law of maths. ‘Order of operations’ are a convention to make writing clear. (PS The solution is always MORE BRACKETS.) Image
Also the answer is 1.
Ok, that was to wind people up. But I think the reason many people (who write equations regularly) get 1 is because the convention of ‘adjacent means multiply’ outranks “×”. Just like a fraction outranks “÷”.

Change it to 6/2 × (1+2) and now it’s 9. (By unofficial convention.)
Read 4 tweets
Matt Parker Profile picture
Oct 5, 2020
When I first heard that cases were missing I thought “can’t be an Excel problem, the rows run out at 1,048,576 which is bigger than even total cases”.

I never thought they’d have a case per COLUMN. Unbelievable. And yes: Excel columns end at 16,384 aka “XFD”.
In Excel on a Mac hit the command-⌘ key with 'right arrow' and you'll jump to the last column (I think Windows is Ctrl+Right). Columns count up alphabetically and you can check that "XFD" is 'Excel base-26' for 16,384 which is 2^14. Excel stores column numbers as 14-bit binary.
All of that said: I’ve not been able to verify that it was a column problem. Just that it was an issue with the limits of Excel. It’s a national disgrace either way, but if anyone has more definitive info please do let me know. matt@standupmaths.com
Read 5 tweets
Matt Parker Profile picture
Sep 2, 2020
If anyone can record themselves signing "Total Ellipse of the Chart" (just that sentence, not the whole song) with music and send it to me within 24 hours: I'll put it in a video (iff it sounds not-terrible). matt@standupmaths.com
Note: I understand not everyone has the privilege of doing stuff like this for free, so I will happily pay. Or donate a commensurate sum to charity. I will also reply to this tweet if someone has done it to avoid anyone wasting their effort. I only need one version! Maybe two.
Ok, so 100% of the people who sent in quick videos of themselves singing have sung “total eclipse of the chart” when the actual requested line is “total ELLIPSE of the chart”. What do I look like: a solar physicist‽
Read 5 tweets
Matt Parker Profile picture
May 27, 2020
We are all set-up to watch the launch and then hopefully see them fly over the UK skies 15-ish minutes later. But it seems the Florida weather needs to improve before the 21:33 BST launch time.
Watching live from the garden. @Dr_Lucie Image
@Dr_Lucie Currently T-minus 25 minutes. We’ll hear at T-minus 20 if the weather is good enough to continue to launch. There may be too much ‘lightning energy’.
Read 8 tweets
Matt Parker Profile picture
Nov 3, 2019
Thanks everyone who sent me this amazing tweet!

So, as always it’s probably a binary overflow problem and sure enough 2^63 = 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 which is close!
The “63” tells us that the system was probably using a 64 digit binary number. But instead of a normal number it would have been ‘signed’: meaning one bit is reserved to indicate positive or negative and the remaining 63 bits used for data.
Then something went wrong. A number was subtracted incorrectly, or inverted, rounded etc. No idea. But it ended up 10 off 2^63.

This is what that number of stations looks like in binary:

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110110
Read 4 tweets
Matt Parker Profile picture
Aug 22, 2019
It’s ok everyone. This is happening. Image
Ok. It has twelve pieces, which is a good start. That feels like a complete puzzle. Image
I have not cracked it yet. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(