Michael Pettis Profile picture
Aug 19, 2019 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Yes, agrees. Ironically democracy seems historically to be “in crisis” precisely when it is most proving its superiority to other systems, i.e. when it is managing us through a difficult, messy adjustment. The books cited here seem to worry that democracy is in trouble because...
...the electorate isn’t just, disinterested and well-informed, but I think this would only be a problem if the purpose of a political system were to express deep political truths. In fact I’d argue that nothing is more dangerous than such a political system: what we need is...
...one that allows our institutions to adjust, however clumsily, as conditions change, and unfortunately because there are times, like today, when change is extremely messy, chaotic and hard to predict, the best we can hope for is to adjust in a messy, chaotic and...
...unpredictable way. Like in the 1930s and the 1970s, I think the populism and “crisis of democracy” that we are experiencing today is just democracy doing what it is supposed to do. It is the non-democracies that are not adjusting, and while this may look like purpose and...
...stability, in fact I think it just reflects institutional rigidity. Jefferson is supposed to have wanted a bloody revolution every fifty years to drive institutional change, but while that may be more aesthetically pleasing, perhaps our way is better.
tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an…
I meant to paste this:
monticello.org/site/research-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Jun 26
1/6
Xinhua: "A consumer goods trade-in program rolled out by Beijing has spurred rising sales of products such as cars, home appliances and furniture."

It is certainly good that Beijing fully acknowledges how weak domestic consumption...

en.people.cn/n3/2024/0626/c…
2/6
has been, and how this creates enormous problems for the economy, but the very confused thinking expressed in this article will make it that much harder to implement effective programs to boost consumption.
3/6
There was never any doubt that subsidizing the consumption of specific goods would cause the consumption of those goods to rise. That's exactly what should happen.

But that doesn't mean total consumption will rise.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 26
1/4
Bloomberg: "Average vacancy rates at logistics properties in east and north China are approaching 20%, the highest in years. More warehouses are being built, which is making the problem worse."

via @economicsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/4
While few analysts would consider that tenant losses and slashed rents in warehouses and industrial parks have anything to do with trade, this is part of the process in which weak...
3/4
demand and excess savings are channeled into over-investment in logistics, which improves manufacturing competitiveness at the cost of weaker domestic demand.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 25
1/4
Xinhua: "China is moving to foster new consumption scenarios in multiple sectors, including tourism, automobiles and electronics, aiming to boost consumer demand and promote the steady growth...

english.news.cn/20240624/8b9ac…
2/4
of consumption. According to the NDRC, China will expand its visa-free transit policy, loosen vehicle purchase restrictions and spur intelligent, AI-powered electronics consumption."
3/4
Sigh. None of these policies will "promote the steady growth of consumption".

The only way to increase consumption is to increase household budgets, but Beijing finds this incredibly hard to do because it ultimately requires transfers.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 24
1/6
Interesting Caixin article on the proposed reforms of China's tax system. Because of a relatively low tax base and the dependence on surging land sales for revenues, local governments especially are having real trouble meeting their expenses.

caixinglobal.com/2024-06-24/cov…
2/6
Much of the reform discussions focus on splitting responsibilities between local governments and the central government, and on ways to raise total funding without undermining domestic demand, especially business and household demand.
3/6
One major problem that I don't think is being addressed is the difference between formal and informal tax revenues. While formal taxes in China are low, the Chinese economy in past decades has been driven by large implicit transfers from households (in the form of...
Read 6 tweets
Jun 17
1/8
"Has China’s property market hit bottom?" Bloomberg asks. "Not quite yet, according to May data, and to the National Bureau of Statistics, which said easing measures will need more time to take effect."

via @marketsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/8
Prices for new homes in the top 70 cities first began to decline month on month in October 2021, and except in January-March and June-July in 2022 and January-May in 2023, when prices were flat or rising, prices have fallen every month since.
3/8
By my calculations, however, prices for new apartments in the top 70 cities have fallen cumulatively by only 4.5% since they began to fall in October 2021. This is consistent with the year-on-year data, but can that be true? Does anyone have a better sense of the decline?
Read 8 tweets
Jun 17
1/5
I think Bloomberg has got it right: "China’s industrial expansion slowed in May and retail spending beat forecasts, a sign that deep imbalances in the economic recovery may be easing at least a little."

via @marketsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/5
While many analysts worried about the slowdown in industrial output, China doesn't have a supply-side problem. It is true that May's year-on-year increase in industrial output (5.6%) was lower than April's (6.7%), but year to date it was nonetheless up a hefty 6.2%.
3/5
On the other hand retail sales (a rough proxy for consumption) were up only 4.1% year to date. The gap between production and consumption must be met either by rising investment, of which China already has too much, or rising trade surpluses, of which the world has too much.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(