Yes, agrees. Ironically democracy seems historically to be “in crisis” precisely when it is most proving its superiority to other systems, i.e. when it is managing us through a difficult, messy adjustment. The books cited here seem to worry that democracy is in trouble because...
...the electorate isn’t just, disinterested and well-informed, but I think this would only be a problem if the purpose of a political system were to express deep political truths. In fact I’d argue that nothing is more dangerous than such a political system: what we need is...
...one that allows our institutions to adjust, however clumsily, as conditions change, and unfortunately because there are times, like today, when change is extremely messy, chaotic and hard to predict, the best we can hope for is to adjust in a messy, chaotic and...
...unpredictable way. Like in the 1930s and the 1970s, I think the populism and “crisis of democracy” that we are experiencing today is just democracy doing what it is supposed to do. It is the non-democracies that are not adjusting, and while this may look like purpose and...
...stability, in fact I think it just reflects institutional rigidity. Jefferson is supposed to have wanted a bloody revolution every fifty years to drive institutional change, but while that may be more aesthetically pleasing, perhaps our way is better. tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an…
1/6 Xinhua: "A consumer goods trade-in program rolled out by Beijing has spurred rising sales of products such as cars, home appliances and furniture."
It is certainly good that Beijing fully acknowledges how weak domestic consumption...
2/6 has been, and how this creates enormous problems for the economy, but the very confused thinking expressed in this article will make it that much harder to implement effective programs to boost consumption.
3/6 There was never any doubt that subsidizing the consumption of specific goods would cause the consumption of those goods to rise. That's exactly what should happen.
But that doesn't mean total consumption will rise.
1/4 Bloomberg: "Average vacancy rates at logistics properties in east and north China are approaching 20%, the highest in years. More warehouses are being built, which is making the problem worse."
2/4 While few analysts would consider that tenant losses and slashed rents in warehouses and industrial parks have anything to do with trade, this is part of the process in which weak...
3/4 demand and excess savings are channeled into over-investment in logistics, which improves manufacturing competitiveness at the cost of weaker domestic demand.
1/4 Xinhua: "China is moving to foster new consumption scenarios in multiple sectors, including tourism, automobiles and electronics, aiming to boost consumer demand and promote the steady growth...
2/4 of consumption. According to the NDRC, China will expand its visa-free transit policy, loosen vehicle purchase restrictions and spur intelligent, AI-powered electronics consumption."
3/4 Sigh. None of these policies will "promote the steady growth of consumption".
The only way to increase consumption is to increase household budgets, but Beijing finds this incredibly hard to do because it ultimately requires transfers.
1/6 Interesting Caixin article on the proposed reforms of China's tax system. Because of a relatively low tax base and the dependence on surging land sales for revenues, local governments especially are having real trouble meeting their expenses.
2/6 Much of the reform discussions focus on splitting responsibilities between local governments and the central government, and on ways to raise total funding without undermining domestic demand, especially business and household demand.
3/6 One major problem that I don't think is being addressed is the difference between formal and informal tax revenues. While formal taxes in China are low, the Chinese economy in past decades has been driven by large implicit transfers from households (in the form of...
1/8 "Has China’s property market hit bottom?" Bloomberg asks. "Not quite yet, according to May data, and to the National Bureau of Statistics, which said easing measures will need more time to take effect."
2/8 Prices for new homes in the top 70 cities first began to decline month on month in October 2021, and except in January-March and June-July in 2022 and January-May in 2023, when prices were flat or rising, prices have fallen every month since.
3/8 By my calculations, however, prices for new apartments in the top 70 cities have fallen cumulatively by only 4.5% since they began to fall in October 2021. This is consistent with the year-on-year data, but can that be true? Does anyone have a better sense of the decline?
1/5 I think Bloomberg has got it right: "China’s industrial expansion slowed in May and retail spending beat forecasts, a sign that deep imbalances in the economic recovery may be easing at least a little."
2/5 While many analysts worried about the slowdown in industrial output, China doesn't have a supply-side problem. It is true that May's year-on-year increase in industrial output (5.6%) was lower than April's (6.7%), but year to date it was nonetheless up a hefty 6.2%.
3/5 On the other hand retail sales (a rough proxy for consumption) were up only 4.1% year to date. The gap between production and consumption must be met either by rising investment, of which China already has too much, or rising trade surpluses, of which the world has too much.