Yes, agrees. Ironically democracy seems historically to be “in crisis” precisely when it is most proving its superiority to other systems, i.e. when it is managing us through a difficult, messy adjustment. The books cited here seem to worry that democracy is in trouble because...
...the electorate isn’t just, disinterested and well-informed, but I think this would only be a problem if the purpose of a political system were to express deep political truths. In fact I’d argue that nothing is more dangerous than such a political system: what we need is...
...one that allows our institutions to adjust, however clumsily, as conditions change, and unfortunately because there are times, like today, when change is extremely messy, chaotic and hard to predict, the best we can hope for is to adjust in a messy, chaotic and...
...unpredictable way. Like in the 1930s and the 1970s, I think the populism and “crisis of democracy” that we are experiencing today is just democracy doing what it is supposed to do. It is the non-democracies that are not adjusting, and while this may look like purpose and...
...stability, in fact I think it just reflects institutional rigidity. Jefferson is supposed to have wanted a bloody revolution every fifty years to drive institutional change, but while that may be more aesthetically pleasing, perhaps our way is better. tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an…
1/7 In August, both growth in industrial output and growth in retail sales came in well below expectations, with the former up 5.2% and the latter up 3.4% (compared to 5.7% and 3.7%, respectively, in the previous month). english.news.cn/20250915/7a106…
2/7 As always, the key point is that for all the talk of rebalancing, the proxy for output growth continues to outpace the proxy for consumption growth by quite a large margin.
Meaningful rebalancing requires that consumption outpace GDP growth by roughly two percentage points.
3/7 Some analysts argue that the weaker-than-expected growth in industrial output may be evidence that Beijing’s attempt to rein in involution is starting to work. Industrial output growth in July and August came in at the lowest paces in all of 2025.
1/8 Bloomberg: "China urged Mexico to “think twice” before levying tariffs, a warning that could signal Beijing’s willingness to retaliate over a move it sees as giving into demands from the US." bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/8 Mexico announced plans earlier this week to impose duties of as much as 50% on cars and other products made by China and several Asian exporters.
These are the kinds of stories I think we'll see more of in the next year or two.
3/8 In the past ten years Chinese exports to Mexico have nearly doubled, and its trade surplus has surged, to $71 billion last year.
This bilateral evolution must be understood as part of a global shift.
1/14
Barry Eichengreen warns, correctly, that "The dollar’s international primacy isn’t eternal. To be sustained, it has to be actively fostered and preserved."
But why sustain the dollar’s international primacy? Is this merely a modern monetary fetish? wsj.com/finance/curren…
2/14
While the primacy of the dollar is certainly good for bankers, financiers, and very wealthy owners of movable capital, what's much less obvious is the extent to which it benefits or harms American workers, manufacturers and middle class households.
3/14
Some analysts will argue that being able to transact in dollars benefits American exporters and importers by reducing currency hedging costs, but the more honest ones will acknowledge that the benefits are tiny, at best, and that their lack doesn't seem to hamper rivals.
1/10
Interesting new IMF paper on the extent of industrial policy subsidies to Chinese manufacturers and SOEs (to the extent information is available) and their impact on productivity. imf.org/en/Publication…
2/10
It measures national-level cash subsidies, tax benefits, subsidized credit, and subsidized land, which collectively amount, it says, to a high 4% of GDP. The authors note that other subsidies exist, including sub-national subsidies, but these are harder to measure.
3/10
I'd include in the latter what is perhaps among the biggest subsidies, which is over-spending on logistical infrastructure. To the extent that these cost more in resources than they create in economic value, they represent a large transfer to the users of the infrastructure.
1/5 Is the expansion in robotaxis driven by the needs of the economy or by policy decisions? This is not a topic on which I have much information or knowledge, but last week I told a Chinese friend of mine (a well-known economist) that I had heard that as many as 30% of the...
2/5 cars in Beijing streets were Didi drivers (China's Uber). This struck me as an incredibly high number.
He told me that he thought in fact 30% might actually be a low estimate. He also told me that he believed Didi drivers aren't able to get more than one fare an hour.
3/5 Whatever the real numbers are, no one seems to doubt that driving Didi or delivering packages has become the job of last resort for a worryingly high number of urban dwellers. If that's the case, it's not clear how improvements in the productivity of taxis or of...
1/7 Although August CPI deflation widened year on year to -0.4%, compared to 0.0% in July and well above expectations of -0.2%, leading many analysts to worry that deflation in China is accelerating, I think prices actually did fine. en.people.cn/n3/2025/0910/c…
2/7 CPI was driven down mostly by a 4.3% decline in food prices, with core inflation up 0.9%, its sixth straight month of higher year-on-year prices. More importantly, in my opinion, month-on-month CPI prices were flat in August, after rising 0.4% in July.
3/7 The fight against “involution” may be responsible for at least part of the deceleration in deflation in the past two months, although if this is the case, it leaves open the question of how long Beijing can keep deflation at bay.