Iain Macwhirter Profile picture
Aug 19, 2019 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
JoHn McDonnell is now suggesting Labour could put the terms of a “credible” Labour-proposed Brexit Deal to a referendum before negotiating with Brussels. Can anyone make sense of this?
Still leaves Labour proposing a form of Fantasy Brexit. Why put a notional deal to a referendum if it hasn’t been cleared by Brussels first? It is certain to change in subsequent negotiations with the 27.
Indeed, Labour would really need two new referendums. One to OK the Labour-proposed deal and another to endorse whatever comes back from Brussels
And we already know what would come back from Brussels: the Withdrawal Agreement and the Irish Backstop which Labour has voted against in the Commons repeatedly.
Everyone seems to think this is a great step forward because McDonnell says he would vote to remain. But it still leaves Labour facing both ways. I don’t known how they could explain this in an election manifesto.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Iain Macwhirter

Iain Macwhirter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iainmacwhirter

Feb 17
Enough! John Swinney should nail NHS Fife for threatening to dismiss the Kirkcaldy nurse, Sandie Peggie, for the sinister thought-crime of “misgendering”. She called De Beth Upon what he is: a man, even as he identifies as a woman. Human biology is not a disciplinary matter.🧵 Image
NHS Fife has doubled-down on its reckless victimisation of Peggie by introducing this threat in the midst of an employment tribunal over her earlier suspension for “bullying and harassing” a six foot tall male-bodied transwoman. The only harassment here is by NHS Fife…
The Peggie case shows how deeply entrenched gender ideology has become in the Scottish public sector. Transwomen are not women and there is no legal right to invade single sex spaces. Yet Fife’s DEI-addled HR department thinks there is…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 7
Seen The Brutalist? Wonder what an actual brutalist city might’ve
looked like? Chandigarh, 250 km north of Delhi, is the only city on the planet planned and built entirely on the Swiss-
French architect,Le Corbusier’s, austere “beton brut” philosophy of living. 🧵@IanMacready @timabrahams )Image
No heritage pastiche here. Built in the 1950’s on a baking hot Punjab plain it must have looked to the dirt poor Indian peasants as if they’d been visited by an alien species. It still feels like that today. It is both striking and other-worldly. Not for the faint-hearted. Image
If some of the buildings seem vaguely familiar that’s because Le Corbusier influenced countless urban planners and post/war architects well into the 1970s. The public loathed brutalism, but the avant grade always had a soft spot for the master. Just as long as they didn’t have to live in one of his concrete towers…Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 18, 2020
One reason the Scottish government has been sounding a little confused recently is that there has been a marked shift in policy on coronavirus - broadly from managing it to eradicating it. Thread 1/5
2/5 This is how the National Clinical Director, Jason Leitch, presented the strategy in March 18th.
3/5 This is not "herd immunity" but it reflects the consensus on SAGE that trying to eliminate the virus would simply generate a second wave. Recently, Sturgeon has been listening to the high-profile Professor of Global Public Health, @devisridhar of Edinburgh University.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 15, 2019
This is a wilful misunderstanding. The women questioning Self-ID are not right wing homophobes. They are feminists, understandably concerned about sex based rights. They will not be silenced by cat calls of “TERF” and “cis”. This debate needs to be open
I speak as a commentator who was sued over my support for abolition of S28, in 2000, when the Sunday Herald was about the only paper calling for abolition. I was 100% for same sex marriage. But this unscientific dogma of “transwomen ARE women”, is very different.
The right of trans people to live and love as they wish free from discrimination and vilification is paramount. This should always be supported. But not at the expense of women’s rights.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(