Very excited that this collaborative paper with @Heilig_Lab and the amazing @MayoOnTheBrain is finally out. Its a big one too! The first demonstration that pharmacological inhibition of FAAH in humans dampens stress responses and augments fear extinction sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@Heilig_Lab@MayoOnTheBrain With all of the negative attention paid to failure of rodent-human translational studies, I think its important to highlight successes. I am going to have a thread now detailing some of the background to this to provide an example of how translational science can work.
@Heilig_Lab@MayoOnTheBrain In 2003, the Piomelli lab first published a paper developing the first FAAH inhibitor and demonstrated that inhibition of FAAH and elevation of AEA signaling can reduce anxiety in rodent models nature.com/articles/nm803
@Heilig_Lab@MayoOnTheBrain@MarsicanoLab@SachinPatelLab@HillardCece@gunduzozge@dylanggee All of this rodent-human research had created a compelling argument, but what was really missing was the pharmacological data in humans that replicated the rodent effects and demonstrated that the FAAH C385A SNP effects weren't just due to neurodevelopment effects of the SNP.
@Heilig_Lab@MayoOnTheBrain@MarsicanoLab@SachinPatelLab@HillardCece@gunduzozge@dylanggee And this is where this paper came in and put it all together, showing that indeed inhibition of FAAH in humans was capable of dampening several behavioral and physiological responses to stress and enhance fear extinction--a nice validation of about 18 years of preclinical work!
@Heilig_Lab@MayoOnTheBrain@MarsicanoLab@SachinPatelLab@HillardCece@gunduzozge@dylanggee But I want to end with again highlighting the importance of translational work and push back on the tired argument that preclinical work is not driving novel therapeutics in humans. This whole story built out of rodent work from a few labs and one day may lead to novel treatments
And massive props to great scientists like @Heilig_Lab and @MayoOnTheBrain who believe in translational science and push projects like this forward, without scientists like this a lot of our preclinical findings would never be realized or move forward in humans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So for those of you interested in what it was that I took issue with in Hubermans first cannabis podcast, this is the Coles notes of the errors/inaccuracies that I noted. A lot of this is covered in the new episode, but some wont make it through and for others this is the TLDR
It's important to understand that I was angered by the first podcast was that as a researcher in this space for over 20 years there is so much inaccuracy in the public, it's tiring to reckon with. When Huberman comes along with a big platform and doesn’t help, it was frustrating.
First lets start with THC. In the first podcast Huberman refers to THC as a “Howitzer”, a super agonist that is 1000x more potent then endocannabinoids. This isnt accurate, THC is only a partial agonist meaning it has high affinity but low efficacy as an agonist at CB1 receptors.
@hubermanlab Holy fucking shit, it is actually disturbing how inaccurate the overwhelming majority of what is said here is. Like I have to believe that you have legitimately just made this stuff up. There is literally no research that has ever been done that could be cited to support this.
@hubermanlab Just a few points:
CBD and THC are not interchangeable. CBD does not bind CB1, it’s pharmacology is largely a mystery.
THC does not trigger retrograde signaling, that’s endocannabinoids. THC binds to the same receptor as endocannabinoids.
@hubermanlab There are virtually none, if any, studies that have ever compared sativa and indica strains in any way as he describes here. Virtually all work done with cannabis is only with a strain provided by NIDA. It’s bizarre to me that he talks about this as if there is a wealth of work.
Hallowe'en horror movie season will be getting an early start this year, as my horror movie countdown list for 2023 is going to be the best horror movie of each year for the last 50 years in what I call #50yearsofhorror
Get your scorecards ready to see how many you've seen!
1973 - The Exorcist
Given that the requel is coming next month, no better way to start a horror countdown then with one of the true GOATs of horror.
50 years later this movie still holds as one of the scariest movies of all time. If you somehow haven't seen it, correct that.
1974 - Texas Chainsaw Massacre
The 70s truly was the golden era of horror with so many amazing classics. TCM is one of the few horrors I love more than exorcist. The gritty, almost snuff film, feel to it still leaves you feeling dirty and horrified. This is authentic true horror
Alex, honestly just stop this. Multiple credible scientists have spoken out to media about you, why are you doing this. I cant believe you would be so petty to go after @zivacooper in a blind tweet like this. Now you’re getting another rant.
First, to try and paint Ziva as an advocate and separate her from the committee is ridiculous. Most of them arent on twitter and most people upset at you are too busy to spend the amount of time I have going after you to correct your multiple errors. But more so...1/n
You continue to demonstrate your clear lack of understanding what the committee actually said by cherry picking the headline from the chapter and ignoring the substance of what they reviewed. You also clearly demonstrate your complete lack of understanding about risk. 2/n