harry benham Profile picture
Aug 20, 2019 16 tweets 4 min read Read on X
A short thread on how the EV market might develop across the globe after studying Norway in some detail. First, and thanks to @liamdenning, here is Rystad Energy's latest 2019 review of the EV market in Norway rystadenergy.com/newsevents/new…
2- this is how the market for ICE vehicles (internal combustion) ends: gradually then suddenly. For more on this please see the Jan 2018 post on dollarsperbbl.com which analysed / predicted Norway as a laboratory for the global market dollarsperbbl.com/2018/01/24/osl…
3-so with that as background: Yes Norway promoted EVs via policies / subsidies, but yes, as noted, this only accelerated a trend; once consumers could buy equivalent vehicles for a 1/6 of the running cost. why not? Plus as EV choice grew, especially Tesla 3, the trend accelerated
4 - ICE Incumbents, assume Norway as an outlier at your peril: numbers
Norway EV mkt share car sales
2013 – 6%
2019 – 51%

EVs % of fleet:
2013 – 1%
2019e – 14%

Diesel Car mkt share
2013 – 60%
2019 – 32%

Main diesel car Volvo V40, V70, XC60
2013 – Market share 6%
2019 – 0.5%
5 - This is how disruption occurs in the energy transition. As we have said, based on S curve mathematics, the change will be non-linear – gradual, then sudden. One can only imagine the tumult in Volvo a few years back that likely caused their pivot to embrace EVs.
6 - Rystad note that with all this EV growth there is “only a modest yet continuous decrease in diesel and gasoline consumption of 2% every quarter since the beginning of 2018– so no correlation with fuel demand”. Of course there is, and actually this decline is very significant
7-Fuel decline is not higher because the fleet of ca 2+million vehicles starts out mostly ICE vehicles being exchanged in the second hand market. So in fact it is perfectly correlated with a S curve model: whilst new sales are above 50%, EVs as part of the fleet are below 15%.
8 - But goodness me – this decline rate is not “modest” – this is the most fearsome beast maths can throw at you as a business: exponential decay – your whole system declining at a constant rate, year after year, whilst competition grows (unless you switch to electric).
9-even discussing a decline of any x% a year is admitting a huge fact: a peak has been reached – decline is now the norm. For any business this is anathema – but here we stroll whistling into the transition as if permanent decline is, you know, not that big a deal (!!).
10-Let’s assume the decay is 4% per year rather than 2% a quarter – take out a calculator and multiply 0.96 by itself 5 times. That is roughly 0.8 – so at this “modest rate” consumption of gasoline and diesel will fall by 20% by 2024,
11-and as EV sales are still growing at ca 15% pa, by 2024 they will have > 90% market share, and be a third of the fleet, at current rates. Try selling a diesel car you bought this afternoon even in 2 years time in downtown Oslo.
12- The full EV transition in Norway is so close that the numbers are becoming very clear – this is what made the modest but real-world market of Norway always so interesting – it is the world’s giant EV petri dish.
13- Here then what I think Norway is telling us as to how this transition goes with passenger vehicles in major markets: first
1 - EVs - reach 5% market share
2 - Hybrids collapse - redundant technology
3 - Diesels collapse - redundant technology plus policy
Then..
14-
4 - Gasoline holds/increases market share until EVs reach 15-20% market share, then quickly yield
5 - Fuel consumption peaks @5% EV market share, plateaus for a short time before exponential; decline, and finally
15 - step 6 - 10 years from the 5% EV market share capture, EVs are ca 90% of sales and 33% of the fleet, new diesels and hybrids do not exist, gasoline niche. Predict that point 2023 Norway, 2027 California (&UK?), 2028 China
16 - and last one: by 2030 EVs are simply Vs. Well its a prediction - let's see what happens over the next few quarters - EV sales still up 40% this year despite car sale declines overall. Cheers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with harry benham

harry benham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @harrybenham_1

Jun 17, 2020
We are all busy, so will compress the new BP review of world energy into three key charts. Here is No1 - primary energy demand up 1.3% (below 10yr trend): renewables (wind/solar) met the magic 5% mark, ahead of nuclear for the first time, and growing at 24% (solar) and 13% (wind)
Note also how the big three fossil fuels are declining or flat-lining: this is most striking in global electricity demand: wind / solar now up to > 10% of total, overtaking nuclear and will overtake hydro 2022:
Finally chart wise is the persistency of coal in Asia: this chart shows that the demise of coal, starting in 2013 is well underway everywhere but Asia Pacific . There are lingering issues in the EU, but Asia is where the battle for coal removal sits.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 22, 2019
A 25-tweet thread that captures the main points in the latest dollasperbbl post: The Energy Transition has entered its Third Act: dollarsperbbl.com/2019/09/22/the…
In a good, but flawed paper from Bloomberg NEF, we can see the rapidly increasing permanence of the transition from thermal (extracted fossil plus nuclear) fuel energy, to renewable manufactured energy (wind/solar/EVs/storage). bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-…
Here is the global picture of how wind/solar growth will alter the structure of world energy:
Which countries reach 50% of energy via wind/solar quickest? Germany 2022, UK (!) 2025, Australia (!!) 2029 – and last place beyond 2050 ? the US. Proud energy laggard.
Read 25 tweets
Sep 9, 2019
1/11 - This is a very important paper from Carbontracker about the inevitability of the energy transition. This thread, eleven long, attempts to capture the core.
@CarbonBubble carbontracker.org/reports/the-tr…
2/11 – Two major reasons for inevitability A) economic / socio-political: when fossil fuels are exploited the beneficiaries are the owners of the assets and the governments who own the land. The cost of externalities eg air pollution and climate issues are shouldered by society
3/11 B) technological: wind/solar/batteries are manufactured energy at global scale: they are now universally accessible and can be copied, improved and deployed efficiently on a daily basis.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(