“... indeed supporting it, and letting the chips falling where they may. But Trump didn’t see it that way. From the outset, he looked at the investigation in terms of how it affected him personally, and not in terms of how it impacted the country.”
“The President relentlessly attacked the investigation .... And he tried to sharply curtail it, and even kill it altogether. Repeatedly. [He] hated that it made it seem he hadn’t actually won the great election victory of which he liked to boast.”
“[He] committed the crime of obstructing justice—multiple times. The report doesn’t specifically draw this conclusion, but it goes through the legal analysis ..., and the result, at least for several of the incidents the report describes, is clear.”
“He ... acted corruptly. He wanted to impede and end an investigation for his own personal reasons, not for the benefit of the nation. Officials around him knew it, which is why they refused to do his bidding, and even grew so alarmed ...”
“... they consulted personal counsel apparently for fear that Trump was potentially putting them into personal legal jeopardy. And Trump’s own behavior betrayed that even knew he was acting corruptly.”
“Indeed, the report shows that Trump even obstructed justice about obstructing justice. When the media reported that he had asked his White House counsel to take steps to get rid of the Mueller, Trump tried to get the counsel to lie about it.”
“Trump [also] tried to get the counsel to create a false document about it. ... [T]rying to get a witness to adopt a false story, or to create a false record, about a matter under investigation, constitutes classic obstruction. Trump brazenly did both.”
“Yet, in the end, the ultimate importance of the Mueller report doesn’t stem from whether it shows specific elements of a particular subsection of the Criminal Code, even one prohibiting obstruction, have been satisfied.”
“To be sure, for the President of the United States ... to commit a crime, and a federal crime at that, is awful. And for him to commit a crime that involves an attempt to pervert justice is absolutely reprehensible.”
“But there is actually more at stake here, something far more fundamental. The people ...
have the right to expect far more of a president than merely that he not be provably a criminal. They have the right to expect ... what the Constitution demands.”
“The Framers understood the presidency ... to be a fiduciary position, a position of trust. ...[T]he ‘original design’—the ‘vision of the framers’—was that the President “is supposed to act like a fiduciary.”
“[Like] a trustee of a trust, ... a fiduciary must subordinate his interests to those of the beneficiaries he is called upon to serve. If he or she doesn’t do that, then on a sufficient showing, an appropriate authority ... could remove the trustee.”
“In the case of a president, the trust is the nation’s federal government, and the beneficiaries are its people. The President is called upon to “pursue the public interest in a good faith republican fashion rather than pursuing his self-interest.”
“The special counsel’s report shows Trump disregarded that duty—indeed, that he showed contempt for it almost whenever he could. Called upon to protect the nation against an attack from a foreign power, he acted principally to protect himself.”
“Indeed, although it is not in the report, Trump, sitting beside the principal perpetrator of this attack just a few weeks ago [Vladimir Putin], effectively mocked his solemn duties to the nation before the world.”
“The Framers laid out the standard by which the President’s compliance with his fiduciary obligations must be judged .... The standard is “high crimes and misdemeanors.” That term was not meant merely to incorporate the criminal statute books.”
“It is a legal term of art, packing in centuries of ... history. At its core, ... ‘the phrase denotes breaches of fiduciary duties’ by public officials. And the Framers charged the Congress of the United States with enforcing that standard.”
“If the Mueller report [shows] one thing, it is that ... Trump utterly failed to carry out his duties under the Constitution—that ...he shamelessly abjured them. It is time for members of Congress to do their duties and to hold the President to account.”
"I have seen this brand of strongman megalomania and the adverse effects it can ultimately have on leaders and their governments. I call it autocratic backfire. …
"As autocrats surround themselves with loyalists who praise them and party functionaries who repeat their lies, leaders can start to believe their own hype. As they cut themselves off from expert advice and objective feedback, they start to promulgate unscrutinized policies that fail. Rather than course correct, such leaders often double down and engage in even riskier behavior — starting wars or escalating involvement in military conflicts that eventually reveal the human and financial tolls of their corruption and incompetence. The result: a disillusioned population that loses faith in the leader and elites who begin to rethink their support."
I first came across the word "megalomania" as a kid when I read William Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. It's essentially a synonym for narcissistic sociopathy or malignant narcissism. All three terms accurately describe Trump.
And for the last several years, because I thought it so evocative of Trump and his circle, I have been urging people to watch "Downfall," the 2004 German-language film that depicts Hitler's last ten days or so in the Führerbunker. The movie brilliantly depicts the dictator's megalomania—as well as the malignant normality lived by his final followers as they cultishly adhered to him until the end.
"'I am living with the deep pain of watching someone I once loved become the face of evil,' [Miller's cousin and former babysitter Alisa] Kasmer wrote. 'I grieve what you’ve become, Stephen …. I will never knowingly let evil into my life, no matter whose blood it carries—including my own.'
"Kasmer points out that she and Miller were raised Jewish with stories about surviving pogroms, ghettos, and the Holocaust.
"'We celebrated holidays each year with the reminder to stand up and say "never again." But what you are doing breaks that sacred promise. It breaks everything we were taught,' she said."
And here we go. The plan seems to be to go full 𝕾𝖈𝖍𝖚𝖙𝖟𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖋𝖋𝖊𝖑, to turn the nation into a military police state. They’re telling each other to be careful what they write down, but they’ve already written down too much. (1/7)
This thread contains excerpts from the government’s June 2022 sentencing memorandum in 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝘼𝙢𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖 𝙫. 𝙂𝙝𝙞𝙨𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙈𝙖𝙭𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡, No. 20 Cr. 330 (S.D.N.Y.).