George Conway Profile picture
Aug 20, 2019 21 tweets 8 min read Read on X
I enjoyed the privilege of writing an epilogue for this great project. You can read it here:

justsecurity.org/65863/expert-s…
Some excerpts from that epilogue, which I hope will encourage you to read all the summaries:

“[T]he job of the President was to protect the nation. That meant allowing the investigation to proceed to its rightful conclusion, ... ”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“... indeed supporting it, and letting the chips falling where they may. But Trump didn’t see it that way. From the outset, he looked at the investigation in terms of how it affected him personally, and not in terms of how it impacted the country.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“The President relentlessly attacked the investigation .... And he tried to sharply curtail it, and even kill it altogether. Repeatedly. [He] hated that it made it seem he hadn’t actually won the great election victory of which he liked to boast.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“[He] committed the crime of obstructing justice—multiple times. The report doesn’t specifically draw this conclusion, but it goes through the legal analysis ..., and the result, at least for several of the incidents the report describes, is clear.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“He ... acted corruptly. He wanted to impede and end an investigation for his own personal reasons, not for the benefit of the nation. Officials around him knew it, which is why they refused to do his bidding, and even grew so alarmed ...”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“... they consulted personal counsel apparently for fear that Trump was potentially putting them into personal legal jeopardy. And Trump’s own behavior betrayed that even knew he was acting corruptly.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“Indeed, the report shows that Trump even obstructed justice about obstructing justice. When the media reported that he had asked his White House counsel to take steps to get rid of the Mueller, Trump tried to get the counsel to lie about it.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“Trump [also] tried to get the counsel to create a false document about it. ... [T]rying to get a witness to adopt a false story, or to create a false record, about a matter under investigation, constitutes classic obstruction. Trump brazenly did both.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“Yet, in the end, the ultimate importance of the Mueller report doesn’t stem from whether it shows specific elements of a particular subsection of the Criminal Code, even one prohibiting obstruction, have been satisfied.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“To be sure, for the President of the United States ... to commit a crime, and a federal crime at that, is awful. And for him to commit a crime that involves an attempt to pervert justice is absolutely reprehensible.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“But there is actually more at stake here, something far more fundamental. The people ...
have the right to expect far more of a president than merely that he not be provably a criminal. They have the right to expect ... what the Constitution demands.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“The Framers understood the presidency ... to be a fiduciary position, a position of trust. ...[T]he ‘original design’—the ‘vision of the framers’—was that the President “is supposed to act like a fiduciary.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“[Like] a trustee of a trust, ... a fiduciary must subordinate his interests to those of the beneficiaries he is called upon to serve. If he or she doesn’t do that, then on a sufficient showing, an appropriate authority ... could remove the trustee.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“In the case of a president, the trust is the nation’s federal government, and the beneficiaries are its people. The President is called upon to “pursue the public interest in a good faith republican fashion rather than pursuing his self-interest.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“The special counsel’s report shows Trump disregarded that duty—indeed, that he showed contempt for it almost whenever he could. Called upon to protect the nation against an attack from a foreign power, he acted principally to protect himself.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“Indeed, although it is not in the report, Trump, sitting beside the principal perpetrator of this attack just a few weeks ago [Vladimir Putin], effectively mocked his solemn duties to the nation before the world.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“The Framers laid out the standard by which the President’s compliance with his fiduciary obligations must be judged .... The standard is “high crimes and misdemeanors.” That term was not meant merely to incorporate the criminal statute books.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“It is a legal term of art, packing in centuries of ... history. At its core, ... ‘the phrase denotes breaches of fiduciary duties’ by public officials. And the Framers charged the Congress of the United States with enforcing that standard.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
“If the Mueller report [shows] one thing, it is that ... Trump utterly failed to carry out his duties under the Constitution—that ...he shamelessly abjured them. It is time for members of Congress to do their duties and to hold the President to account.”

bit.ly/31NLQq7
If you haven’t had the chance to read the full Mueller report, or just want a refresher, please read this excellent set of short essays.

justsecurity.org/65863/expert-s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Conway

George Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gtconway3d

Jun 1
Absolutely agree with @Delavegalaw, @MichaelCohen212, and @meiselasb. I was in the courtroom that day, and I found that moment to be a good one for the defense, but felt it was only a small one and essentially the only good moment during a rather long, meandering, and ineffective cross-examination.

I was astonished—shocked, in fact—when I learned that television viewers, particularly on @CNN, had been misled into believing that the defense had dealt some kind of death blow to the prosecution’s case.

Some of the mainstream media coverage of the case has been downright bizarre, and remains so. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Here’s what I said about that day right after court, at 5:04 pm EDT on May 16, 2024. I’m not patting myself on the back for being right; I’m just expressing mystification about how many others could have been so wrong.
I think it may have the herd instinct we all have. If just one legal analyst sitting in a studio vigorously pronounces a misguided, albeit well-meaning, take (let’s leave aside the Trump shills the networks absurdly decided to air), that can influence how others (particularly the nonlegal journalists) how they perceive or express things (because they want to appear to play things down the middle). And the public gets misled.
Read 9 tweets
May 23
Chris defends the Goldwater rule in his “deep dive.” It has been the subject of severe criticism among many mental health professionals. Their informed criticisms are far more persuasive than Chris’s cursory defense. I attach a (small) sampling of their articles:
Read 5 tweets
May 15
Every bit as funny as, “It’s past your jail time, Donald.”
Dealing with Trump is actually easy. He’s not normal. So you don’t treat him as normal.

You treat him like the nut job he actually is. But you do it with humor.
He won’t be able to handle it.

He’s a narcissistic sociopath.

He will make Captain Queeg and Colonel Jessup look like pikers.

And it will be glorious to watch.
Read 4 tweets
May 3
Yep. Even if Cohen had advanced the money in October 2016 on his own without any expectation of repayment by Trump—a ludicrous lie—Cohen would have committed a campaign finance violation (which is why he pleaded guilty to one).
Hicks’s testimony establishes beyond any question that Trump knew about that illegal and undisclosed contribution, and knew that his reimbursement of Cohen was not a payment for legal services.
And that means, beyond any reasonable doubt, that means that Donald Trump intentionally created false business records—including the checks that he himself signed—to cover up the underlying campaign finance violations.
Read 6 tweets
May 1
the folks who watch Fox News have no idea how horrible New York City really is Image
even for people who aren’t being persecuted for making perfectly legal and properly documented legal retainer payments smh Image
yeah sure more lies from Sleepy Joe and Hunter Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 14
Numerous experts have pointed out Trump’s aphasia. And here it is yet again.

Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(