Hey #DragonCon! I'll be wandering all over per usual, chatting about pretty rocks & catastrophic doom & science in fiction. Join me?
Friday 10am: Sandbox Games as Fieldwork Simulators
I'm accidentally solo for this, so I'd love your examples of who else does crap like geologic surveys in Skyrim or frog-collecting in Zelda, or games like Stardew Valley that send you ore-collecting as a quest.
Friday 1pm Science & Engineering in Cosplay
You know I'm obsessed with how much STEM goes in to fashion. This is the fandom edition with @seelix & @StudentofWhim. Have questions on geometry in pattern design? Fav examples of incorporating microprocessors? Pls ping!
It'll be a hands-on (gigantic!) panel as @stevennovella@SkepticZone@Matt_Dillahunty Rox of Spazhouse, Charlie Kaufman & I sort out how to spot fakes, photoshops, & scams about irl disasters.
Lasers & forcefields & faster than light travel & spacebattle tactics & more with @jess_cail@kevingrazier (and probably a big hunk of behind-the-scenes storytime if you give us an excuse!)
It's going to be a rotating dance of @ocaptmycapt@DrRubidium@VSJRecombinase & I reliving our epic fails, flubs, & cringe-inducing moments of when things did not go to plan. It's TIFU, SciComm edition
Licking Rocks refuses to thread nicely. It’s inexplicable, yet appropriate.
The @DragonCon app released its 2019 schedule, so find me in the Speaker’s list to get all this in one handy format. 💚
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m reading a lot of well-intentioned articles that make it clear how many scicomm peeps have no idea disaster risk reduction is a deep field with a lot of research into effective communication.
ProTip: Using fear & shame as motivation backfires when applied to public health.
I can’t write this article (or even thread!) right now as I’m under medical orders to drop my stress levels (ahahahahasob), but...
If you’re writing well-intentioned pieces trying to influence pandemic behaviour, please take some cues from disaster sociology research. It exists!
Fundamental premise:
Vanishingly few people make active choices they believe will endanger themselves or the people they love.
If they’re making “bad” choices, it’s a fundamentally different risk perception. Until you understand how & why, your argument will miss its audience.
Even if you don’t pay much attention to ground-based astronomy, you know this telescope from pop culture & movies. It’s somewhere special. nature.com/articles/d4158…
This article from just before the closing announcement is fantastic for the context of why Arecibo is so unique: space.com/arecibo-observ…
I just...
I know we’ve got a lot going on, especially with the mass casualty event scheduled shortly after US Thanksgiving.
But take some time to read the Arecibo tributes as they come out. They won’t be cheerful. But they’ll be heartfelt.
But technically landslide are fluid-like, not fluids.
Why?
Because they’re a mixed mess of materials that act differently when moving than when still. You can’t just sample a tree trunk, some peat, and water to figure out the rheologic properties (how it flows).