Dan McLaughlin Profile picture
Aug 21, 2019 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
"Professionalizing" ambassadors would mean they no longer work for the president - another chip away at our democracy in favor of the unelected administrative state. But from what I can see, Warren's actual plan is just generalities: medium.com/@teamwarren/re…
In the 19th century, ambassador was a hugely important position, requiring independent judgment to act on the ground (and gather intelligence) far from home. With modern communications, an ambassador's single most important qualification is the confidence of the president.
That's not to say that ignorant donors should be our representatives (there are less intrusive reforms one could pursue), but "professional" ambassadors who aren't on the same page as the POTUS would be worse than no ambassador at all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan McLaughlin

Dan McLaughlin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @baseballcrank

Jan 13
The liberal justices keep referring to the plaintiff in Little v Hecox as "she," which of course begs the merits question of how the gender classification operates in this case. If the plaintiff was female, Idaho's law wouldn't bar the plaintiff from playing women's sports.
BARRETT: You don't need your laws to be so tailored they fit everybody perfectly.

JACKSON: I don't understand why you can't just make exceptions.

WV: That's literally what tailoring is.
ALITO: To decide if there is discrimination on the basis of sex under Title IX, we need to define what sex is, right?

ACLU: Yes.

ALITO: What does it mean to be a man or woman, boy or girl?

ACLU: We do not have a definition for the Court.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 8, 2025
Sotomayor: "You're asking us to destroy the structure of government."
Sotomayor rambling on about why the current Court should think it is smarter than the "renowned" jurists who *dissented* in Myers v US
Kagan: Doesn't it invade the separation of powers to give presidents control over agencies when those agencies "do a LOT of legislating" and "a LOT of judging"?

Anyone who wants the executive agencies to go back to being executive in nature:
Read 38 tweets
Mar 5, 2025
Democrats may say that gender is a social construct, but I don't see male Congressional Democrats wearing hot pink.
Now testing who's had enough shots to feel comfortable shaking hands with RFK.
Image
Read 19 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
Both Thomas & Alito have already told the Solicitor General that they believe she's misleading the Court. Never heard Thomas do that. Roberts told her SCOTUS is not "best situated" to decide evolving medical treatment questions.
Alito arguing that Bostock involved "particular language in a particular statute," whereas this case is under the Equal Protection Clause. Clearly an argument aimed at Gorsuch.
Prelogar: Classifying by pregnancy is not a proxy for sex.

LOL.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
"Why should a candidate for office think people tuned in to a debate to hear him rather than the moderators?"

There's a sense of entitlement here, but it's not Vance's.
Nobody remembers the moderators from the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Because they didn't have any.
As a rule, if you moderated a debate & people remember the moderation, you didn't do your job.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(