Thread by @AcadFreedom

'Seven Key Misconceptions about Evolutionary Psychology' L. Al-Shawaf @LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine

areomagazine.com/2019/08/20/sev…

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Evolutionary approaches to psychology hold the promise of revolutionizing the field and unifying it with the biological sciences. But among both academics and the general public, a few key misconceptions impede its application to psychology and behavior."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 1: Evolution and Learning Are Conflicting Explanations for Behavior"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "People often assume that if something is learned, it’s not evolved, and vice versa. This is a misleading way of conceptualizing the issue, for three key reasons."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "First, many evolutionary hypotheses are about learning. For example, the claim that humans have an evolved fear of snakes and spiders does not mean that people are born with this fear...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... Instead, it means that humans are endowed with an evolved learning mechanism that acquires a fear of snakes more easily and readily than other fears."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "As with monkeys, the hypothesis that humans have an evolved fear of snakes does not mean that we are born with this fear. Instead, it means that we learn this fear via an evolved learning mechanism that is biologically prepared to acquire some fears more easily than others."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Second, learning is made possible by evolved mechanisms instantiated in the brain. We are able to learn because we are equipped with neurocognitive mechanisms that enable learning to occur—and these neurocognitive mechanisms were built by evolution."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Third, construing evolution and learning as automatically in conflict is a mistake because they are not even located at the same level of analysis: learning is a proximate explanation, whereas evolution is an ultimate one...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... (The proximate level of analysis explains how something works, whereas the ultimate level explains why it works that way, or why the system was built that way in the first place)...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... To say that something is a product of evolution does not imply anything about how the behavior comes about during an organism’s lifespan: it may involve some learning, no learning, or a great deal of learning."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 2: The Products of Evolution Must Be Present at Birth (or Must Emerge Very Early in Development)"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "second common misconception is that the products of evolution must be present at birth—or, at least, must emerge early in development. But this is not how natural selection works: it builds adaptations that come online during the developmental phase in which they are needed...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., not just adaptations that are present at the arbitrarily selected moment of birth. Teeth, breasts and facial hair illustrate this well: they are all uncontested products of evolution, yet are not present at birth."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "To claim that a psychological tendency or behavior is produced by evolution is not to claim that it is present at birth, but rather that it develops reliably in all or most members of the species during the appropriate developmental stage of the organism’s life."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 3: Evolution Implies Genetic Determinism"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "No matter how widespread the belief, an evolutionary approach to psychology does not imply that behavior is genetically determined There are two ways to appreciate this point."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "First, like all other life scientists, evolutionary psychologists subscribe to an interactionist view that states that everything in the mind, body and brain is jointly co-determined by genes and environment."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Second, an evolutionary perspective emphasizes the centrality of the environment, pointing out that it is crucial at every phase of the causal process: the initial evolution of adaptations, their development across the lifespan and their triggers in the immediate present."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 4: If a Behavior Varies across Cultures, It Is Not a Product of Evolution"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "This idea makes intuitive sense, but nonetheless misses the mark. The problem is this: evolutionary thinking does not suggest that behavior will be uniform across cultures...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., but rather that the neurocognitive machinery that produces behavior will be uniform across cultures. This is a very different claim."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Consider language. People who grow up in different cultures learn different languages. Does this mean that language abilities are not a product of evolution? Hardly...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... It simply means that natural selection has sculpted a universal ability to learn language—but the actual language you learn depends on where you grow up. "

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "This is a key distinction: most evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior predict universality at the level of the information-processing structure of the neurocognitive mechanisms that produce behavior, not at the level of the final behavioral outputs themselves."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Cultural differences in mating strategies illustrate this point. Cross-cultural studies show that differences in mating strategy across cultures can be predicted on the basis of operational sex ratio...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... In countries with a dearth of men, the culture tends to lean more toward short-term mating. In countries with a dearth of women, the culture tends to lean more toward long-term mating. Why? These dynamics can be understood in economic terms: ...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... the mating market is a kind of biological market in which the rarer sex has greater bargaining power. Because men, on average, have a stronger desire than women for casual sex, cultures with fewer men tend to shift toward more short-term mating...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... And because women, on average, have a stronger desire than men for committed mating, cultures with fewer women tend to shift toward greater commitment."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "This is what is meant by evoked culture: a universal psychological mechanism, combined with environmental inputs that differ by culture, yields behavior that differs by culture...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... Crucially, not only does the cultural variation in mating behavior not conflict with an evolutionary explanation, it was actually predicted before the fact using evolutionary reasoning."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "The conventional wisdom in the social sciences is that cultural differences in a behavior imply that the behavior in question does not have an evolutionary basis...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... This seems intuitive, but the conclusion is unwarranted because evolutionary approaches to psychology predict cross-cultural universality at the level of information-processing mechanisms, not at the level of behavior...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... Cross-cultural variation in behavior is not only consistent with an evolutionary perspective, it can often be predicted a priori using careful evolutionary thinking."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine 'Misconception 5: Evolutionary Psychology Doesn’t Pay Enough Attention to Individual Differences'

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "There is some truth to this idea, especially if you turn the clock back twenty years.

Evolutionary psychology began with a focus on species-typical mechanisms and sex differences...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... At first glance, individual differences—especially heritable ones—appear more challenging from an evolutionary perspective, and it took researchers a while to start tackling the subject in earnest."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Entire volumes in evolutionary psychology are now dedicated to the topic, as are chapters in handbooks dedicated to personality psychology and individual differences."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 6: Evolutionary Psychologists Think That Everything is an Adaptation"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "This canard just won’t die—though it is tenable only if you read misinformed critiques rather than the actual primary literature in the field."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "In their published writing, evolutionary psychologists frequently state explicitly that evolution yields three kinds of products: adaptations, byproducts and noise. Beyond this theoretical statement, researchers also propose hypotheses about, and conduct studies on, byproducts."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "The disparity between this criticism of evolutionary psychology and what evolutionary psychologists actually say in their published work is remarkable."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Part of the problem is a philosophical disagreement about what adaptationism means. As many evolutionary psychologists understand the term, adaptationism is not a commitment to the idea that all or most features of our psychology will turn out to be adaptations...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... once we’re done studying them. Rather, it is a heuristic and a methodological approach that involves testing hypotheses about potential adaptations—and then rejecting those hypotheses if the evidence is not in their favor...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... In other words, adaptationism is a working starting point and a research strategy that yields testable hypotheses, not some kind of religious commitment to the notion that a particular trait will turn out to be an adaptation before the trait in question...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... has even been investigated. As a working method and a research strategy, it has borne a lot of fruit. As an unquestioned assumption, it would indeed be terrible—but working evolutionary psychologists don’t seem to use it that way...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... Observers can easily be forgiven for thinking that they do, because audiences have been repeatedly told so by prominent authors such as Stephen Jay Gould, who had a documented tendency to misrepresent his interlocutors’ views."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Misconception 7: Evolutionary Psychological Hypotheses Are Just-So Stories"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "For those who aren’t familiar with the term, just-so storytelling refers to the unscientific process by which a psychologist notices something about human behavior...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., concocts a convenient explanation for it (in this case, an evolutionary one) and then decides to believe that explanation without further inquiry or testing."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "There are two basic approaches to hypothesis testing in science. The first is the top-down method: the researcher uses a theory to generate a hypothesis, derives specific predictions from that hypothesis, and proceeds to test those specific predictions...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... It is almost impossible to make the mistake of just-so storytelling using the top-down approach, because the researcher is making predictions a priori on the basis of theory...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... Much research in evolutionary psychology employs this approach, beginning with theory and proceeding from there...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... The second approach to hypothesis testing is the bottom-up approach: the researcher notices something about human behavior or psychology...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., comes up with a hypothesis that might explain that behavior, then uses this hypothesis to generate new predictions, and finally tests those predictions."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Both of these approaches are normal and productive parts of science, but this second one (bottom-up) can potentially lapse into just-so storytelling if the researcher stops halfway through and simply accepts the explanation he or she has concocted...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... without bothering to derive and test any new predictions from it. A researcher who does this is guilty of just-so storytelling. Fortunately, however, very few researchers in any scientific discipline make this egregious mistake."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "If you survey the primary literature in evolutionary psychology, you’ll notice two things: 1) a lot of evolutionary psychological work employs the top-down approach, rendering this research essentially immune to the just-so charge...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... And 2) most of the bottom-up evolutionary research does not stop halfway through the process; rather, the researchers usually generate novel predictions from the hypothesis they just concocted, and proceed to test those novel predictions in new empirical studies...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... This means that most bottom-up work in evolutionary psychology appears not to fall into just-so storytelling either."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "So why do so many people persist in the notion that evolutionary psychological hypotheses are just-so stories? Here’s a potential partial explanation. People might be under the impression that because 1) evolutionary psychology involves a historical element...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., and 2) we can’t peer directly into the past, this means that evolutionary psychological hypotheses are ultimately untestable, and must therefore be just-so stories. This kind of thinking is tempting, but it is wrong—and it misunderstands the nature of hypothesis testing."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "First, consider the fact that if it were true that hypothesis testing is ultimately impossible in any field that contains a historical element, this would make all of the following fields unfalsifiable and riddled with just-so nonsense: cosmology, astrophysics, paleontology...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., archeology, geology and evolutionary biology. This is obviously wrong, and should serve as a warning sign to those who think the historicity of evolutionary psychology automatically renders its hypotheses unfalsifiable."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Second, this misunderstands the nature of hypothesis testing. Evolutionary psychologists don’t need to travel into the past to test their hypotheses at all—instead, their hypotheses may be informed by their (admittedly incomplete) knowledge of the past...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., but these hypotheses yield empirical predictions about what we should expect to see in the modern world. In other words, an evolutionary psychological hypothesis yields predictions about what we should find when we test modern humans under condition X."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "This, I believe, is the crux of the issue. It is tempting to think that the partial historicity of evolutionary hypotheses renders them unfalsifiable, but this misunderstands the notion of falsifiability and the nature of hypothesis testing...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... As long as evolutionary hypotheses yield predictions about humans that can be tested in the modern environment—and they do—they are eminently falsifiable."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Conclusion"

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "The point of this essay is not to suggest that evolutionary approaches to psychology are perfect. They are not, and there is certainly room for improvement. However, the widespread misconceptions discussed in this essay have impeded the field’s acceptance."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Perhaps more importantly, these misconceptions impede the progress of psychology as a whole, because the science of mind and behavior cannot reach its full potential if it ignores evolution...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ...There is simply no escaping the fact that our brains are a product of evolution, and that this has important consequences for how our minds work."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine "Evolutionary approaches to psychology continue to make theoretical advances every year and yield new empirical discoveries every month. Instead of tilting at evolutionary psychological windmills...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ..., it’s worth making a good-faith effort to engage with what researchers in the field are actually saying and doing. Readers who do so may be surprised to see that what they find is often strikingly different...

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine ... from the straw men one comes across so often in the secondary literature. They may also reap a wonderful theoretical and empirical harvest, and begin to understand human psychology in a new light."

@LaithAlShawaf @AreoMagazine End thread