Custodial Interrogation is required to confront P Chidambaram with the relevant documents and other accused in the case to take the investigation further, Mehta
We are at pre chargesheet case. He is not providing all the documents required for investigation.. certain questions can be answered only when the accused is not under the protective umbrella.., Mehta.
Mere appearance becomes a formality when the accused in under the protective umbrella. This is a serious case..of monumental magnitude, Mehta concludes as he urges the Court to grant 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.
Kapil Sibal begins, informs the Court that co-accused Karti Chidambaram was granted regular bail by Delhi HC, Chartered Accountant Bhaskaraman is also on anticipatory bail.
Other accused, Peter and Indrani Mukherjea are on default bail, Sibal.
This is a case of documentary evidence. The Secretaries recommended the case to the Finance Minister and he approved.. The FIR was filed after 10 years, Sibal
Last night, the CBI said that they wanted to interrogate him... They didn't start the interrogate until 12 noon and asked him only 12 questions... By now they should know what questions to ask. The questions are not ready, Sibal
All co-accused are on bail.. they (prosecution) could have written a letter to me asking for the documents needed for investigation.. why did they not do that?, Sibal
When the judge reserved the Judgement for seven months, is this the 'protective umbrella' that I sought?, Sibal
I have serious objection with the manner in which the accused as dealt with.. What is written in the case diary is not evidence in the case but only to aid in such inquiry or trial, Sibal
P Chidambaram is a called four months after Indrani's statement is recorded in 2018.. for 11-12 months P Chidambaram is not called for interrogation, Singhvi.
To create a reason for custody now, they create a reason that Indrani is now an approver, Singhvi.
She turns approver in 2019 based on the same old statement given in 2018..Singhvi.
You (Prosecution) have not made allegations of tampering of evidence or flight risk against P Chidambaram, Singhvi.
Grant of remand is an exception. Investigating Agency must make out a strong case that without custody further investigation would be impossible, Singhvi reads out a Supreme Court judgement.
Further investigation is going on. We filed an affidavit before HC stating that further investigation under section 173 CrPc is going on. It is our statutory right.There is a need to interrogate, Mehta.
Justifying calling P Chidambaram for interrogation only once, Mehta says,
We had a reasonable ground to come to the conclusion that we may not be able to reach the truth unless the protective umbrella is removed.
The protection was removed only in August 2019 when the Delhi HC said that the gravity of the offense committed by the accused demanded denial of bail, Mehta.
A responsible Prosecution wouldn't reveal the chronology of the questions to be asked. Whatever questions were asked, were recorded.
I cannot be denied my right to interrogate.. it is my duty to the nation, Mehta
We are considering remand..flight risk etc are not relevant.. We are dealing with intelligent people.. we would be failing as Prosecution if we do not reach the root (of the matter), Mehta.
Sibal says he does not want the questions to be made public, only want to ascertain the genuineness of the question.
P Chidambaram permitted to speak.
On June 6, 2018, please ask for the transcript.. there is no question which has not been answered.
The allegation of 5 Million whatever were never put to me. Only asked me if I have a foreign bank account or my son who furnished the details.
Supreme Court to hear it's suo motu case on the issues concerning the definition of the Aravalli Hills
#SupremeCourt had earlier decided against imposing a complete ban on mining in the #Aravallis, observing that such prohibition leads to illegal mining activities
Matter to be heard post 10:30 am today #Aravallis #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: There were a lot of misconceptions regarding orders, the govt role etc .An expert committee was constituted and a report was given which the court accepted.
CJI: We feel that the report of the expert committee and the some resultant observation made by this court ... Which is generating misunderstood notions.. it will need some clarifications.
Vacation bench led by CJI Surya Kant to hear Central Bureau of Investigation’s plea challenging the Delhi HC order suspending the life sentence awarded to former Uttar Pradesh MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the Unnao rape case #supremecourt #UnnaoCase #KuldeepSinghSengar
Matter to be heard post 10:30 am today #supremecourt #UnnaoCase #KuldeepSinghSengar
Packed courtroom 1.
SG Tushar Mehta leading the CBI team in #SupremeCourt
Bench to assemble at 11 am
#supremecourt #UnnaoCase #KuldeepSinghSengar
Delhi High Court to hear today a PIL seeking an inquiry against the DGCA for the Indigo fiasco and fourfold compensation to passengers who were left stranded at airports due to the cancellation of flights.
#IndiGoCrisis @IndiGo6E
A Division Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela to hear the case.
Supreme Court hears the case where it had examined growing pendency of gangster-related trials in Delhi and considered whether dedicated special courts are needed to ensure their timely completion
CJI Surya Kant: Suppose UAPA and NIA.. there can be one special court. These courts should be like emergency ward in a hospital. Suppose there is NIA trial then only that case goes on. When no Nia Or UAPA then ordinary civil and criminal cases can go on there.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: In our status report we have furnished minutes of meeting approved by the Home secretary.
CJI: we do not appreciate the home secretary asking states to take it up with the High courts
ASG: we have identified states where there are 10 Nia trials. lot of PFI trials in Kerala. In Bihar as well. Our letters and draft norms are also attached. We can file an action taken report as well..
Sr Adv Siddharth Dave: Please see the observations made by the HC judge
CJI Surya Kant on alleging bias against Judges: There are hypothetical situations in court. We make observations. But I am not someone who will take browbeating. Not so easy with me. As soon as the judge makes an observation there are allegations made against him.#SupremeCourt
CJI Surya Kant: Sometimes we make errors but we rectify it. I just did it. We deal with such large volume of cases and evidence.
Sr Adv Sidharth Luthra: Please see what the trial court observed that the accused was taken aback by framing of charge. The court has proceeded...
Sr Adv Dave: the judge holds that I should be proceeded against misconduct.
CJI: court was correct because counsels were being changed so often.
CJI: we will help you rebuild trust and faith in the system.
[Order]
CJI: Instant appeal is against September 2025 order passed by Karnataka HC declining petitioner prayer for transfer of trial pending before the learned presiding judge of 81st city civil (MP MLA court). Prayer was to transfer case to to any other MP MLA court.
Supreme Court hears a euthanasia application by the parents of a child:
Court: this is very very unfortunate. The boy seems to be in a pathetic condition. The bedsores are extremely painful. And when a patient in vegetative state suffers from bedsores means he’s not been looked after well. His hygiene is poor. Bedsores are the end of everything. Now we have waterbeds etc to prevent formation of bedsores. They are extremely painful. Doctors have said in so many words that there is no question of recovery. So he is to remain like this till he is destined to leave.
Court: how do we now move to the next stage?
Counsel: as per the judgement in common cause the next step to be followed by the reference of a secondary board formed by the CMO. But in this case the primary board already had 5 experts constituted by the CMO so it does not require the secondary board reference. The next step is to admit him to a neuro palliative facility where life support will be withdrawn.
Court: to pass over the secondary board reference they (members of the primary board) will need to have people with 5 years experience.
Counsel: yes. Your lordships can even have a committee of experts as per the judgement.