Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 22, 2019 62 tweets 20 min read Read on X
#INXMedia: Former Union Minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram to be produced before Speical CBI Court soon.

P Chidambaram was arrested by CBI last night.

Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Vivek Tankha, Nalini Chidambaram reach Court.

#PChidambaram
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi also arrives.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
CBI Prosecutor Padmini Singh takes her place.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan and Advocate Arshdeep Singh enter the court room.

P Chidambaram to be produced any time now.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
P Chidambaram's son Karti Chidambaram also arrives.

#PChidamabaram #INXMedia
P Chidambaram produced before Court.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta joins the CBI legal team.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
CBI Judge Ajay Kumar Kuhar arrives.

Proceedings to begin.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
SG Mehta for the Prosecution seeks 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Mehta apprises the Court of the INX Media case.

#INXMedia #PChidamabaram
Non bailable warrant was issued by the Court pursuant to which P Chidambaram was arrested, Mehta.

#INXMedia
Right to be evasive with respect to questions that only the accused can answer is non cooperation, Mehta.

He did not cooperate..Did not respond at all., Mehta

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Custodial Interrogation is required to confront P Chidambaram with the relevant documents and other accused in the case to take the investigation further, Mehta

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
He took advantage of the protective cover provided by the Delhi High Court, Mehta.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Mehta reads the Delhi High Court judgement authored by Justice Sunil Gaur, points out that the case was called a 'classic case of money Laundering'.

#PChidambaram
We are at pre chargesheet case. He is not providing all the documents required for investigation.. certain questions can be answered only when the accused is not under the protective umbrella.., Mehta.

#PChidambaram
Serious, active and informed role of the accused is made out from the case diary.., there is money trail.. that needs to be probed into, Mehta.

Places the case diary before the CBI Judge.

#PChidambaram
Mehta reads a Supreme Court judgement on importance of custodial interrogation.

#PChidambaram
Mere appearance becomes a formality when the accused in under the protective umbrella. This is a serious case..of monumental magnitude, Mehta concludes as he urges the Court to grant 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Kapil Sibal begins, informs the Court that co-accused Karti Chidambaram was granted regular bail by Delhi HC, Chartered Accountant Bhaskaraman is also on anticipatory bail.
Other accused, Peter and Indrani Mukherjea are on default bail, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
Relying on the fact that a draft chargesheet in the case is ready, Sibal argues that the investigation in the case is already complete.

#PChidambaram
FIPB approval is given by 6 Secretaries of the Government of India. None of them have been arrested, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
This is a case of documentary evidence. The Secretaries recommended the case to the Finance Minister and he approved.. The FIR was filed after 10 years, Sibal

#PChidambaram
He was interrogated only on one day, Sibal

#PChidambaram
You (Prosecution) could have called him again. He has never skipped any interrogation, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
When CBI says something has happened, it is not the gospel truth. It is a matter of personal liberty, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Please call for the record of his interrogation conducted on June 6, 2018 to see if he was evasive, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Last night, the CBI said that they wanted to interrogate him... They didn't start the interrogate until 12 noon and asked him only 12 questions... By now they should know what questions to ask. The questions are not ready, Sibal

#PChidambaram
The questions had nothing to do with the accused, P Chidambaram, Sibal

#PChidambaram
The 12 questions that were asked are before you (Court).. he has already answered them. He did not give any evasive reply, Sibal

#PChidambaram
They could have interrogated him at any point of time after 2017 (when case was registered) or June 6, 2018 (when he was interrogated last), Sibal

#PChidambaram
All co-accused are on bail.. they (prosecution) could have written a letter to me asking for the documents needed for investigation.. why did they not do that?, Sibal
When the judge reserved the Judgement for seven months, is this the 'protective umbrella' that I sought?, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Grant of police remand is an exception, not a rule. A strong case must be made out by the prosecution, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
I have serious objection with the manner in which the accused as dealt with.. What is written in the case diary is not evidence in the case but only to aid in such inquiry or trial, Sibal

#PChidambaram
This is a case which has nothing to do with evidence but something else, Kapil Sibal concludes.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi begins.

Arrest is not automatic. It is an exception. The entire case is based on case diary and a statement by Indrani Mukherhea, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
P Chidambaram is a called four months after Indrani's statement is recorded in 2018.. for 11-12 months P Chidambaram is not called for interrogation, Singhvi.
To create a reason for custody now, they create a reason that Indrani is now an approver, Singhvi.

She turns approver in 2019 based on the same old statement given in 2018..Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
Singhvi argues the triple test for rejection of remand plea. CBI's case is only based on the allegation of evasion, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
Singhvi reads a Supreme Court Judgement on custodial interrogation.

Purpose of custodial interrogation is not confession, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
How can he (Prosecution) seek police remand on the basis of evasion?, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Non-coperation is not appearing for interrogation and not not answering the questions in the manner that the prosecution wants, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
The FIPB approval was given by 6 Secretaries to the GOI, one of them later became the RBI Governor..He merely endorsed it, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
You (Prosecution) have not made allegations of tampering of evidence or flight risk against P Chidambaram, Singhvi.
Grant of remand is an exception. Investigating Agency must make out a strong case that without custody further investigation would be impossible, Singhvi reads out a Supreme Court judgement.

#PChidambaram
There has not been any new development in the case. Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
What is the point of police custody?, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
P Chidambaram says he wants to speak.

Tushar Mehta objects.

Singhvi cites a Delhi HC Judgement that allows the accused to make a representation on his behalf.

#PChidambaram
We are here dealing with an accrued who has tremendous potential of not answering, not cooperating, Mehta.

Karti was arrested and remanded to custody and released on regular bail, Mehta

#PChidambaram
Further investigation is going on. We filed an affidavit before HC stating that further investigation under section 173 CrPc is going on. It is our statutory right.There is a need to interrogate, Mehta.
Justifying calling P Chidambaram for interrogation only once, Mehta says,

We had a reasonable ground to come to the conclusion that we may not be able to reach the truth unless the protective umbrella is removed.

#PChidambaram
The protection was removed only in August 2019 when the Delhi HC said that the gravity of the offense committed by the accused demanded denial of bail, Mehta.
A responsible Prosecution wouldn't reveal the chronology of the questions to be asked. Whatever questions were asked, were recorded.

I cannot be denied my right to interrogate.. it is my duty to the nation, Mehta
We are considering remand..flight risk etc are not relevant.. We are dealing with intelligent people.. we would be failing as Prosecution if we do not reach the root (of the matter), Mehta.

#PChidambaram
Sibal says he does not want the questions to be made public, only want to ascertain the genuineness of the question.
P Chidambaram permitted to speak.

On June 6, 2018, please ask for the transcript.. there is no question which has not been answered.
The allegation of 5 Million whatever were never put to me. Only asked me if I have a foreign bank account or my son who furnished the details.
Order reserved on remand reserved.

#PChidambaram
Order to be pronounced after half an hour.
CBI Court sends P Chidambaram CBI Custody till August 26.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Breaking: Court sends P Chidambaram to CBI custody till August 26 @PChidambaram_IN
#INXMediaCase #ChidambaramArrested #PChidambaram
barandbench.com/breaking-cbi-c…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Apr 22
Delhi HC to hear today a plea seeking contempt of court action against Arvind Kejriwal, AAP leaders and journalist Ravish Kumar for allegedly publishing the video recording of court proceedings when Kejriwal argued before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.

CJ Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and J Tejas Karia to hear the case.

@AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal @VaiibbhavImage
The petition has been filed as a PIL by advocate Vaibhav Singh.

Apart from Kejriwal and Kumar, action has been sought against Digvijay Singh, Manish Sisodia, Sanjay Singh Sanjeev Jha, Purandeep Sawhney, Jarnail Singh, Mukesh Ahlawat and Vinay Mishra.
The plea also seek removal of those videos from social media platforms.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 21
Supreme Court hears plea by Muslim cleric Kazeem Ahmad Sherwani, alleging hate crime over his religious identity.

Sherwani alleges that his beard was pulled, his cap was removed, and he was insulted on religious grounds.

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta Image
Sherwani had approach the Court seeking a fair investigation, stating that appropriate penal provisions were not invoked in his case by UP Police.
The State had earlier conceded that relevant sections dealing with religious hate speech were not added to Sherwani’s FIR.

The court had then asked the State to add the relevant sections (section 153B and 295A of the IPC) to the FIR.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 20
[In Re: Creation of Special Exclusive Courts]

All Advocate Generals of all states in Supreme Court , Court 1 today

CJI Surya Kant: You are all here. There are questions of liberty, right to life etc. State writes to HC Chief justice that court needed for sc st act. Then another letter asking for Nia Court. Same special court becomes the nia court. Then family cases. So the special court becomes a mockery.

ASG Aishwarya Bhati: State has to provide land and building. 1 crore recurring fund also needed for each of these court.Image
CJI: Day to day trial has to take place in these courts.

CJI: This court has to be in adjoining, next building or closest to the place where bar members are. Ideally it should be in the same complex. It has to be one court. Immediately one court needed. Then additional manpower will be needed. So we need trained and experienced judicial officers and there will be temporary increase in higher judicial services cadre strength also.

Jharkhand: There are 790 UAPA cases pending. All principal district judges are dealing with UAPA Cases
CJi: this is what is creating the problem. Hardly they will be on bail

Justice Bagchi: just see how many are undertrials at the moment. That is our concern. Not the state or centre.

CJI: the 24 courts you have are not special courts also.

Justice Bagchi: do you know the burden of the principal district judge. Is the judge dealing with only UAPA
Read 7 tweets
Apr 20
[Md Abdur Raheman vs State of Odisha] Accused who is facing trial for recruiting youth to join Al Qaeda

Sr Adv: Trial in Odisha are on the same charges and the same material. He has already served 10 years when maximum is 7.5 years.

CJI: but look at his association with one of the most dreaded organsiations in the world. Society also deserves to live peacefully.

Sr Adv: But how can he be tried twice for the same offence?

CJI: yea that is true. He can serve only the maximum period not beyond that.

ASG Natraj: we will finish the trial in 6 months.

CJI: please ensure that state public prosecutor, one dedicated one has to be in court always for trial in this case. We will fix a timeline of 2 months. We will direct day to day hearing.Image
CJI: the petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7.5 years by Patiala House court. He has undergone that sentence. There is another 2015 FIR registered in Cuttack, Odisha.
CJI: He had approached District court and high court to release him on bail. Odisha HC denied him bail. Petitioner says that he is in custody for more than 10 years. He says since sentence in Delhi FIR is over he deserves to be released on bail.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 20
#Breaking
Delhi HC to pronounce today it's judgement on Arvind Kejriwal and others' plea seeking recusal of justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case.

Judgemen at 2:30PM.

@AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal Image
Update: After Kejriwal files a rejoinder to CBI's written statement, the Court takes it on record as written submissions.

Justice Sharma says the order will be pronounced at 4:30 PM.
Update: Pronouncement of judgement at 5:30 PM.
Read 96 tweets
Apr 20
Arvind Kejriwal to appear today before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma and request the judge to take his rejoinder on record.

According to AAP's legal team, Kejriwal will appear at 10:30 AM.
@ArvindKejriwal @SanjayAzadSln Image
In his rejoinder, Kejriwal has said that the CBI, in its written submissions, "resorted to speculation, imputation of motives, rhetorical alarmism, and
scandalous allegations," but did not respond to his allegations of bias on the part of Justice Sharma since her children are on the government's panel.
"It is very unfortunate that the CBI is willing to malign the entire judiciary in order to have this matter heard before only one Hon’ble Judge," Kejriwal says.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(