Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 22, 2019 62 tweets 20 min read Read on X
#INXMedia: Former Union Minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram to be produced before Speical CBI Court soon.

P Chidambaram was arrested by CBI last night.

Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Vivek Tankha, Nalini Chidambaram reach Court.

#PChidambaram
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi also arrives.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
CBI Prosecutor Padmini Singh takes her place.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan and Advocate Arshdeep Singh enter the court room.

P Chidambaram to be produced any time now.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
P Chidambaram's son Karti Chidambaram also arrives.

#PChidamabaram #INXMedia
P Chidambaram produced before Court.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta joins the CBI legal team.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
CBI Judge Ajay Kumar Kuhar arrives.

Proceedings to begin.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
SG Mehta for the Prosecution seeks 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Mehta apprises the Court of the INX Media case.

#INXMedia #PChidamabaram
Non bailable warrant was issued by the Court pursuant to which P Chidambaram was arrested, Mehta.

#INXMedia
Right to be evasive with respect to questions that only the accused can answer is non cooperation, Mehta.

He did not cooperate..Did not respond at all., Mehta

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Custodial Interrogation is required to confront P Chidambaram with the relevant documents and other accused in the case to take the investigation further, Mehta

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
He took advantage of the protective cover provided by the Delhi High Court, Mehta.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Mehta reads the Delhi High Court judgement authored by Justice Sunil Gaur, points out that the case was called a 'classic case of money Laundering'.

#PChidambaram
We are at pre chargesheet case. He is not providing all the documents required for investigation.. certain questions can be answered only when the accused is not under the protective umbrella.., Mehta.

#PChidambaram
Serious, active and informed role of the accused is made out from the case diary.., there is money trail.. that needs to be probed into, Mehta.

Places the case diary before the CBI Judge.

#PChidambaram
Mehta reads a Supreme Court judgement on importance of custodial interrogation.

#PChidambaram
Mere appearance becomes a formality when the accused in under the protective umbrella. This is a serious case..of monumental magnitude, Mehta concludes as he urges the Court to grant 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Kapil Sibal begins, informs the Court that co-accused Karti Chidambaram was granted regular bail by Delhi HC, Chartered Accountant Bhaskaraman is also on anticipatory bail.
Other accused, Peter and Indrani Mukherjea are on default bail, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
Relying on the fact that a draft chargesheet in the case is ready, Sibal argues that the investigation in the case is already complete.

#PChidambaram
FIPB approval is given by 6 Secretaries of the Government of India. None of them have been arrested, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
This is a case of documentary evidence. The Secretaries recommended the case to the Finance Minister and he approved.. The FIR was filed after 10 years, Sibal

#PChidambaram
He was interrogated only on one day, Sibal

#PChidambaram
You (Prosecution) could have called him again. He has never skipped any interrogation, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
When CBI says something has happened, it is not the gospel truth. It is a matter of personal liberty, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Please call for the record of his interrogation conducted on June 6, 2018 to see if he was evasive, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Last night, the CBI said that they wanted to interrogate him... They didn't start the interrogate until 12 noon and asked him only 12 questions... By now they should know what questions to ask. The questions are not ready, Sibal

#PChidambaram
The questions had nothing to do with the accused, P Chidambaram, Sibal

#PChidambaram
The 12 questions that were asked are before you (Court).. he has already answered them. He did not give any evasive reply, Sibal

#PChidambaram
They could have interrogated him at any point of time after 2017 (when case was registered) or June 6, 2018 (when he was interrogated last), Sibal

#PChidambaram
All co-accused are on bail.. they (prosecution) could have written a letter to me asking for the documents needed for investigation.. why did they not do that?, Sibal
When the judge reserved the Judgement for seven months, is this the 'protective umbrella' that I sought?, Sibal

#PChidambaram
Grant of police remand is an exception, not a rule. A strong case must be made out by the prosecution, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
I have serious objection with the manner in which the accused as dealt with.. What is written in the case diary is not evidence in the case but only to aid in such inquiry or trial, Sibal

#PChidambaram
This is a case which has nothing to do with evidence but something else, Kapil Sibal concludes.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi begins.

Arrest is not automatic. It is an exception. The entire case is based on case diary and a statement by Indrani Mukherhea, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
P Chidambaram is a called four months after Indrani's statement is recorded in 2018.. for 11-12 months P Chidambaram is not called for interrogation, Singhvi.
To create a reason for custody now, they create a reason that Indrani is now an approver, Singhvi.

She turns approver in 2019 based on the same old statement given in 2018..Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
Singhvi argues the triple test for rejection of remand plea. CBI's case is only based on the allegation of evasion, Sibal.

#PChidambaram
Singhvi reads a Supreme Court Judgement on custodial interrogation.

Purpose of custodial interrogation is not confession, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
How can he (Prosecution) seek police remand on the basis of evasion?, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram #INXMedia
Non-coperation is not appearing for interrogation and not not answering the questions in the manner that the prosecution wants, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
The FIPB approval was given by 6 Secretaries to the GOI, one of them later became the RBI Governor..He merely endorsed it, Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
You (Prosecution) have not made allegations of tampering of evidence or flight risk against P Chidambaram, Singhvi.
Grant of remand is an exception. Investigating Agency must make out a strong case that without custody further investigation would be impossible, Singhvi reads out a Supreme Court judgement.

#PChidambaram
There has not been any new development in the case. Singhvi.

#PChidambaram
What is the point of police custody?, Singhvi

#PChidambaram
P Chidambaram says he wants to speak.

Tushar Mehta objects.

Singhvi cites a Delhi HC Judgement that allows the accused to make a representation on his behalf.

#PChidambaram
We are here dealing with an accrued who has tremendous potential of not answering, not cooperating, Mehta.

Karti was arrested and remanded to custody and released on regular bail, Mehta

#PChidambaram
Further investigation is going on. We filed an affidavit before HC stating that further investigation under section 173 CrPc is going on. It is our statutory right.There is a need to interrogate, Mehta.
Justifying calling P Chidambaram for interrogation only once, Mehta says,

We had a reasonable ground to come to the conclusion that we may not be able to reach the truth unless the protective umbrella is removed.

#PChidambaram
The protection was removed only in August 2019 when the Delhi HC said that the gravity of the offense committed by the accused demanded denial of bail, Mehta.
A responsible Prosecution wouldn't reveal the chronology of the questions to be asked. Whatever questions were asked, were recorded.

I cannot be denied my right to interrogate.. it is my duty to the nation, Mehta
We are considering remand..flight risk etc are not relevant.. We are dealing with intelligent people.. we would be failing as Prosecution if we do not reach the root (of the matter), Mehta.

#PChidambaram
Sibal says he does not want the questions to be made public, only want to ascertain the genuineness of the question.
P Chidambaram permitted to speak.

On June 6, 2018, please ask for the transcript.. there is no question which has not been answered.
The allegation of 5 Million whatever were never put to me. Only asked me if I have a foreign bank account or my son who furnished the details.
Order reserved on remand reserved.

#PChidambaram
Order to be pronounced after half an hour.
CBI Court sends P Chidambaram CBI Custody till August 26.

#INXMedia #PChidambaram
Breaking: Court sends P Chidambaram to CBI custody till August 26 @PChidambaram_IN
#INXMediaCase #ChidambaramArrested #PChidambaram
barandbench.com/breaking-cbi-c…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Apr 25
Delhi High Court directs counsels representing Delhi University, Delhi Police, Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) President Aryaan Maan and other contesting candidates who allegedly violated court orders, Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and guidelines framed for conducting DUSU Elections, to be present before court on next date of hearing.Image
The matter was listed before Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia.
Court - Where is the university counsel? Where are the students?

Counsel appearing on behalf of Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) representing Union of India and Delhi Police stated that his senior is not available.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 24
[Case of rape of a four year old girl in Ghaziabad]

Sr Adv N Hariharan: They have dragged father and wants to record Sextion 164 croc statement. If investigation is complete then why to record it now. You say chargesheet is filed and now this. Police man can be seen dragging the father. The father is right here. He was asked not to change the statement. If trial is there then he will be summoned. He was dragged by police..these two hospitals have filed affidavits saying the child was alive..where is the need for coercion.Image
Hariharan: As far as this situation is concerned. The investigation officers etc are behaving very differently. Not a single person examined in the hospital. Why is it that they are shielding the hospital. This requires a probe
Hariharan: no medical attention was given to the child. They had the facilities.

CJI: records indicate as alleged by the father of the child is duly noticed in our earlier order. Petitioner grievance has been that their needs to be fair probe and that there is negligence on part of local police and two private hospitals.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 24
KERALA ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS

Plea before Kerala High Court alleges nearly 6000 government employees deputed for election duty did not receive their ballot papers in time to vote.

They also allege that they have not received the allowances payable to them for election duty. Image
The petitioners are members of the Jojnt Council of State Service Organisation of govt employees.

Despite specific directions to pay
₹6000 per BLO for the SIR of electoral rolls, members of the petitioner association claim to have received only ₹2000 for months of work.
"The members of the 1st petitioner association undertook several months of work as part of the SIR of electoral roles as Booth Level Officers, going door to door in unfavourable weather conditions. While the Chief Electoral Officer has commended the BLOs for their work,
the commensurate incentives have not been paid", the petitioners contend.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 24
Supreme Court to hear the West Bengal SIR case today. With phase 1 of the polling over, the court is likely to witness mentions concerning non inclusion of voters, incidents of violence, and the functioning of appellate tribunals
#SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial #WestBengalLegislativeAssemblyelection2026 #SIR @abhishekaitc @ECISVEEP @BJP4BengalImage
NIA submits it's first report in the suo motu case concerning attack on west bengal SIR judicial officers

ASG SAV Raju: Give us time for chargesheet. They are neck deep in investigation

CJI: we are granting.
Sr Adv Kalyan Banerjee: Only 136 appeals have been disposed off out of 27 lakhs filed. This is very very sad.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 23
#Breaking
Delhi court orders FIR against Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for objectionable posts about Newslaundry’ Manisha Pande and other journalists.

@Iyervval @MnshaP @newslaundry Image
The court says that Iyer-Mitta made sexually coloured remarks against Pande and other journalists and the same are prima facie intended to insult Pande and she has been named in the tweet as well.

“Therefore, on perusal of
the application and the material placed on record by the
complainant, this Court is of the view that the content of the
tweets posted by the accused on “X” platform discloses
commission of cognizable offences under section 75(3) and 79 of
BNS,” the court says.
“This Court is of the view that police investigation is necessary as the offence has been committed in cyber space on platform "X". Therefore, police investigation is necessary to verify the user account on platform "X" from which the said tweets were published. Further police investigation is also necessary to trace and recover the computer source/electronic device from which the said tweets were published. This Court is also of the view that the Action Taken Report which was filed by PSI Ombir in the present case is not satisfactory as the above stated tweets were not considered in the report,” the court adds.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 23
Delhi High Court seeks response of YouTuber Shamita Yadav on the contempt petition filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia over defamatory content on social media concerning his appearance on a TV news show. Image
Bhatia appeared in person to argue his case - it is imperative to note that attacking the dignity of person using obscene and sexually suggestive language under free speech cannot be permissible under any circumstances.
Bhatia - She is repeatedly using the terms “nanga” and “bhajpille”. She is aware that there is a case filed agasint her also. She starts by saying, defamation case on me? She uses obnoxious words, she being a lady. She is an officer of the court as well. She also has to maintain dignity.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(