Custodial Interrogation is required to confront P Chidambaram with the relevant documents and other accused in the case to take the investigation further, Mehta
We are at pre chargesheet case. He is not providing all the documents required for investigation.. certain questions can be answered only when the accused is not under the protective umbrella.., Mehta.
Mere appearance becomes a formality when the accused in under the protective umbrella. This is a serious case..of monumental magnitude, Mehta concludes as he urges the Court to grant 5 days custody of P Chidambaram.
Kapil Sibal begins, informs the Court that co-accused Karti Chidambaram was granted regular bail by Delhi HC, Chartered Accountant Bhaskaraman is also on anticipatory bail.
Other accused, Peter and Indrani Mukherjea are on default bail, Sibal.
This is a case of documentary evidence. The Secretaries recommended the case to the Finance Minister and he approved.. The FIR was filed after 10 years, Sibal
Last night, the CBI said that they wanted to interrogate him... They didn't start the interrogate until 12 noon and asked him only 12 questions... By now they should know what questions to ask. The questions are not ready, Sibal
All co-accused are on bail.. they (prosecution) could have written a letter to me asking for the documents needed for investigation.. why did they not do that?, Sibal
When the judge reserved the Judgement for seven months, is this the 'protective umbrella' that I sought?, Sibal
I have serious objection with the manner in which the accused as dealt with.. What is written in the case diary is not evidence in the case but only to aid in such inquiry or trial, Sibal
P Chidambaram is a called four months after Indrani's statement is recorded in 2018.. for 11-12 months P Chidambaram is not called for interrogation, Singhvi.
To create a reason for custody now, they create a reason that Indrani is now an approver, Singhvi.
She turns approver in 2019 based on the same old statement given in 2018..Singhvi.
You (Prosecution) have not made allegations of tampering of evidence or flight risk against P Chidambaram, Singhvi.
Grant of remand is an exception. Investigating Agency must make out a strong case that without custody further investigation would be impossible, Singhvi reads out a Supreme Court judgement.
Further investigation is going on. We filed an affidavit before HC stating that further investigation under section 173 CrPc is going on. It is our statutory right.There is a need to interrogate, Mehta.
Justifying calling P Chidambaram for interrogation only once, Mehta says,
We had a reasonable ground to come to the conclusion that we may not be able to reach the truth unless the protective umbrella is removed.
The protection was removed only in August 2019 when the Delhi HC said that the gravity of the offense committed by the accused demanded denial of bail, Mehta.
A responsible Prosecution wouldn't reveal the chronology of the questions to be asked. Whatever questions were asked, were recorded.
I cannot be denied my right to interrogate.. it is my duty to the nation, Mehta
We are considering remand..flight risk etc are not relevant.. We are dealing with intelligent people.. we would be failing as Prosecution if we do not reach the root (of the matter), Mehta.
Sibal says he does not want the questions to be made public, only want to ascertain the genuineness of the question.
P Chidambaram permitted to speak.
On June 6, 2018, please ask for the transcript.. there is no question which has not been answered.
The allegation of 5 Million whatever were never put to me. Only asked me if I have a foreign bank account or my son who furnished the details.
Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's order which set aside the appointments in over 24,000 teaching and non-teaching posts in government schools #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial
Sr Adv Vibha Datta Makhija: we would need two days.
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: Yes let us start. No piecemeal arguments.
State: Let the state start.
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi begins for state of West Bengal
Supreme Court hears appeal challenging the Madras High Court's decision to allow Carnatic vocalist TM Krishna to receive the Sangita Kalanidhi MS Subbulakshmi Award.
ASG Venkataraman: Award was
conferred and it was greatly publicised. He is a person who made misogynistic comment against her
#SupremeCourt
ASG: the single judge order is in effect. The music academy could not have given the award yersterday. Can an injunction be breached and a public act be committee? Court is not powerless.
ASG: the court can stay this award or till suit is pending the fourth respondent cannot use the name of the award at all
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: Fourth respondent is not represented here as of now.
- Allu Arjun is being represented by G Ashok Reddy
- Justice Juvvadi Sridevi to hear the matter
Justice Sridevi to hear the matter at 4 PM
#AlluArjun #ALLUARJUNARRESTED
Actor Allu Arjun was arrested after he visited Sandhya Theatre on December 4, 2024 to watch #Pushpa2. His security staff pushed general public and commotion caused a death of 39 year old. Her husband filed an FIR holding #AlluArjun & Management responsible for her death.
Bhushan Steel insolvency case: #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the case
Earlier Enforcement Directorate (ED) has stated that its appeal against JSW Steel's takeover of Bhushan Power and Steel might not be required to be argued in view of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Adv Zoheb Hossain: if the relief can be moulded then the plea can be disposed off.
Justice Bela Trivedi: are you appearing on behalf of SG Mehta?
Hossain: Attachment by ED has been made after the approval of plan by NCLT.. thus prayer can be considered. If it is restored then let the attachment be restored to resolution professional under 8(8).
Justice Trivedi: We will not pass any piecemeal orders.
Tempers flare in #SupremeCourt amid hearing in case concerning adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal; Court urges lawyers to maintain discipline.
Court: If all of you behave like this ... Don’t you know this being livestreamed? Don’t you know these things are going in public domain?
Court: Don’t you think that this kind of behaviour inside the courtroom – what kind of impression is being given to the public? What kind of message is being given, you are officers of the Court all of you!
#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange
Court: Lot of training is required to be given to the bar also. We are sorry with the way you are going ahead ... You don't have any decorum to maintain in court?
#BREAKING: Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging constitutional validity of provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986
Bench: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan
#UPGangstersAct
Senior Adv R Basant (appears for Petitioner): Whether only on basis of one base case another case under the act can be registered by the police itself. Furthermore, police is complainant, prosecutor and adjudicator under provisions of the act. Please note. This is important
Sr Adv Basant: Also, under this Act, without even a case of FIR against a person, its entire property are allowed to be attached. This aspect came up in Dharmendra Kirthal (2013) 8 SCC 368 as well and the court had issued notice but later did not consider the issue.