Owen is right on this of course (minor couple of quibbles aside) but important to understand this is only half the story. Men opening up about distress & seeking help is important, but only helpful when we (as individuals, society & institutions) are prepared to listen & hear.
"Men must speak out & be prepared to seek help" is an atomised, individualist remedy which is actually quite convenient to the (dare I say it? Neoliberal) establishment, as it places onus on the man suffering & ignores, eg, chronic shortages of therapy on NHS @OwenJones
@owenjones The obsession with persuading men to open up about their feelings as a solution to the suicide crisis also ignores the massive role played by economic & social factors in suicide rates. Tens of thousands of men died (globally) as a direct consequence of the 2008 financial crash.
@owenjones It also ignores complex webs of social support needed to reduce/prevent suicide - alcohol & drug treatment. Homelessness. Criminalisation of social marginalisation. Patterns of child abuse and failings in child protection. Family breakdown & alienation. All massively significant.
@owenjones So yes. I'm not arguing with Owen, what he says is correct. But it is also only one part of the story - and the fact that it is the *only* part of the story which is routinely discussed is deeply problematic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Quick catch up thread from yesterday for those of you who have been graciously & indulgently following my threads about (so-called) male victims of Violence Against Women and Girls over the years. >
We began the day with the announcement that the Mayor's Office in Manchester has launched the region's own male victims strategy as part of its gender-based violence programme. greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/news/greater-m…
This is hugely significant, most importantly to male survivors in the combined authority, but also it sets up a model for the rest of the country, both devolved & regional powers & national govt, demonstrating that it CAN be done without in any way diminishing the women's sector.
First, it's clear that Trump won pretty comfortably. His biggest voting bloc was older, whiter & poorer. Blaming one specific demographic seems a bit daft. The blame is in the failure of the Democrats, whether in their tenure or campaign (FWIW I guess more the former.) BUT >
There's no doubt there was indeed a marked swing towards Trump among young white men (YWM) even just since 2020. Why? I've seen it said that they won't vote for a woman / WoC. >
OK since a slightly personal, messy & snide thread last night caught interest, here's a more direct account of my interpretation of An Inspector Calls, by J.B. Priestley.
I invite/challenge anyone who knows the play and/or more about JBP than I do to tell me I'm wrong. 🧵
The play tells of police 'Inspector Goole' visiting a rich ruling class family one evening & tells them that a young woman 'Eva Smith' has died of suicide. He proceeds to explain that every single member of the family has (literally or figuratively) fucked Eva one way or another.
Before leaving he delivers a monologue explaining there are millions of Eva & John Smiths & that unless the family change their ways, "I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish." >
I doubt Tom is really listening but for the sake of others.
1/ A UK Embassy issues visas but the national government (of, say, Cameroon) issues passports & they often won't issue them to persecuted minorities. >
2/ In situations of civil war or violent upheaval people often get separated from their possessions, such as their passports & other documents.
>
3/ People's first response in situations of danger is often to flee over a border to somewhere safer & you will usually not be able to apply for a visa from a second country once you have done so.
>
Every mention of a ceasefire is greeted by yells of "So how would YOU get rid of Hamas?"
For what little it is worth, here are my own answers to that question. 🧵
1/ Stop giving them exactly what they want. Hamas is a fundamentalist martyrdom cult and their central strategy is to provoke Israel into committing acts of appalling violence & cruelty, because those acts are their own very best recruiting sergeant.
You cannot destroy Hamas with indiscriminate slaughter because indiscriminate slaughter creates endless fury, endless thirst for retaliation and revenge, across Gaza, across Palestine, across the world. Indiscriminate slaughter is what Hamas feeds off.
Think it's probably time to once again to talk about WHY the overwhelming majority of refugees, asylum seekers & irregular migrants are young men, and why being a young man does not mean someone is not a genuine refugee or genuinely in need. 🧵
1/ Migrant journeys are extraordinarily arduous & incredibly dangerous. By conservative estimates at least 29,000 people have died trying to reach Europe since 2014. Migrants are at high risk of violence, inc. sexual violence & exploitation, or being robbed to destitution etc. >
Families often will not allow their daughters to make the journeys as they're considered safer in war zones, disaster zones etc than they would be on the road.
2/ boys & young men are first in line in war zones. >