New #prosthetics publication that came out during @ISB_ASB2019 characterizes how individual prosthesis user gait biomechanics were affected by the next-generation @OssurCorp Propriofoot (ankle adaptation to slope) during incline walking. 1/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp Previous studies on similar microprocessor-controlled ankles have focused on group-level results (inter-subject mean). Our study builds upon this by presenting subject-specific results and investigating to what extent individual responses agree with the group-level results. 2/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp The ProprioFoot increased minimum toe clearance for all subjects. Despite the ankle behaving similarly for each user, we observed marked differences in individual responses, e.g., intersubject differences in landing patterns, center of pressure (COP) knee angles and moments. 3/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp Individual user responses were often not well represented by group mean. Prevailing experimental paradigm in prosthetic gait analysis is focused on group results, but our findings call attention to high inter-subject variability which may necessitate other experiment designs. 4/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp I noticed several other presentations/posters @ISB_ASB2019 which also broached a similar methodological topic and this question about #biomechanics study design, and subject-specific interventions or evaluations. 5/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp Particularly for studies on new/emerging tech. I'm currently reflecting on pros/cons of alternative study designs (e g. single-subject design), analyses, outcomes & data visualization methods. Input welcomed on how others are thinking about tackling these challenges... 6/n
@ISB_ASB2019@OssurCorp Also thinking about why group-level analysis (t-tests, ANOVAs) seems to have become the de facto standard in #gaitanalysis studies, specifically #prosthetics research; given the well-known heterogeneity of persons with amputation & variability in response to interventions. 7/7
Nice article posted to the Associated Builders & Contractors of Wisconsin website & co-written by Prof. Zhenhua Zhu from UW-Madison & Mariya Sorenson, a construction manager with M.A. Mortenson.
They highlight 3 potential broad impacts of exos:
1. Improving worker safety & fostering a better safety culture in the construction industry.
Exoskeletons can reduce fatigue, muscle strain & wear-and-tear injuries, which could lead to substantial cost savings.
2. Alleviating the shortage of skilled construction workers.
Exoskeletons could help extend careers & attract candidates who might otherwise be deterred by physically demanding jobs.
🚀 5 years ago, I stumbled—somewhat unexpectedly—into the world of tech translation, commercialization & startups. It's been a wild & enriching adventure!
👨🏾🔬 As a scientist-turned-entrepreneur, this journey opened my eyes to the business world.
But...
😡 Amidst all the positive learning & growth, there's one thing that truly gets under my skin: misleading marketing & unsubstantiated claims.
😬 Brace yourself: The wearable & assistive tech industry (think #exoskeletons, #prosthetics, sensors) is still plagued by this problem! Whether it's in clinical, occupational, sport, or recreational applications, we need to address it head-on.
I used to source all of mine from academic literature & conferences, or from my own research.
But these can become echo chambers that limit thinking & creativity.
🔥 Here are 4 overlooked places to find impactful research problems:
1️⃣ Your own life
• This is why I started studying low back #biomechanics
• I was a parent to young kids & experiencing back pain
• I was curious if we could create more practical exoskeletons that'd fit into my own life
It started as an undergrad project then grew into more:
2️⃣ Spending time w/ users
• In academia we often talk about this
• But we tend to involve users too late in R&D
• And I'm not convinced we spend enough time doing it
Hearing pain points directly from #prosthetics users is what prompted the daily activities we now study:
Science is the foundation, but user feedback is the north star:
• to know what to prioritize
• to learn where to improve
• to remember why you sweat all the science details
This is a vital lesson for those doing applied research whose feedback is mostly from other scientists
The combination of #biomechanics science and user-centric design is beginning to have the real-world impact the occupational #exoskeleton field long hypothesized it would.
End-users explain this best:
“When you show you care about people, that retains people,” one warehouse worker who piloted a back exosuit said. “Everybody in here, we’re all sore. We’re all hurting. But for the first time in a long time I won’t be hurting walking out of this building [because of the exosuit]”
Early career researchers often stress out when they talk to more senior faculty about how many grant proposals they submit.
Don't compare. Focus on your writing process. Outcomes will follow.
Here are 5 proven tricks senior faculty use to submit more high-quality proposals:🧵
1. Resubmitting
• Revise/resubmit an unfunded proposal
• This takes much less time than writing a new application
This is easier to do (and comes naturally) as you get further into your career.
2. Repurposing
• Take a similar core idea and apply it to a new population or context
• Or you can sometimes submit the same proposal to multiple agencies (check w/ program officers first; you just can't accept two grants for the same work)