The cynical take is everything crashes terribly and the bottom falls out like never seen before.
But there is also another take: That if passive money doesn't sell then it's possible for a small portion of funds to move the market up due to limited float
I think that's what we're seeing. Funds are gobbling everything up and the market float is shrinking.
If you have a few percent decline and passive doesn't sell a buy the dip from quant and the funds left can push things back quickly.
As the float continues to shrink the bid becomes dictated by a smaller and smaller pool of investors.
In theory this small pool are the highly intelligent active investors doing research, but that's the theory. I doubt that's actually true.
Eventually this can be a self reinforcing mechanism. If the float shrinks enough the marginal passive buyer continues to push the bid up as the active investor sells.
At some tipping point the only way a passive dominated market could crash is if..
retail investors lose confidence and pull money. At that point we'd get a crash of biblical proportions because there is no natural buyer.
I don't think we're at that tipping point yet, but the dynamics of this are fascinating to think about.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What does this mean? If a client is perfectly happy with their bank they won’t switch relationships.
When there is an inflection point a borrower will think about their loan and relationship, measure and value it. This is where banks can win.
What are inflection points?
-Prospects loan is maturing/ballooning and they are thinking about service products.
-prospect’s bank closed a branch but our bank hasn’t. Service isn’t as local to them anymore.
-Prospect has expanded their business significantly