3/The U.S. absolutely does need to reduce its carbon emissions drastically.
But this will not be enough. Not even close to enough. If other countries don't follow suit in a big way, we're doomed.
4/The U.S. is not the world-straddling hyperpower we were in the 90s.
It's frightening to realize how much of the problem is out of our direct control at this point. But it's something we must face, and something we must deal with.
9/Third, we can pay for other countries to build green infrastructure - solar and wind plants, electrical grids, energy storage, car charging stations, etc.
This could be done through the Green Climate Fund, or through other development agencies. jayinslee.com/issues/global-…
10/Another idea is for America and other rich countries to buy up coal deposits around the world and leave the coal in the ground, as proposed by @bardharstad.
But beyond that, we could threaten trade cutoffs and other sanctions against governments like Bolsonaro's that willingly destroy the environment.
12/Note that in order to have the moral authority to enact such punitive measures on other countries, the U.S. must also be aggressively pursuing our own program of deep decarbonization - which we are not yet doing.
13/Keep in mind that NONE of these approaches is going to be politically possible while Trump is president. But we need to be thinking about them for the time after Trump. The world can't afford to wait.
About 8% of students have participated in the protests on one side or the other. That's a substantial number, but less than the 21% who joined BLM protests in May/June 2020 (and the latter were pretty much all on one side of the issue).
The Palestine protesters have created a dream Palestine that is almost entirely disconnected from the real place, in which all of their fantasies of a perfect society are realized.
Most weebs don't actually want to live in Japan. They want to live in a local subculture of their own creation, whose values are based on gentleness and romance -- the ideals that attracted them to Japanese fantasies and made those fantasies resonate.
Comparisons between the Cultural Revolution and the Woke Era get laughed at. The Woke Era didn't use violence, of course. But the *motivation* of people wanting to overturn social hierarchies, especially students wanting to overturn academic hierarchies, is recognizably similar.
In 2010s America, there was a widespread desire to overturn local social hierarchies -- the classroom authority of teachers and professors, the cultural power of entertainment stars, the authority of nonprofit execs and heads of civic organizations.
In 1960s China, overturning local hierarchies happened via physical mob violence. In 2010, it happened through online mobs destroying people's reputations on social media. Obviously, the second is far preferable to the first. This is why economic development is good!
1. They engender material equality more efficiently than any other economic intervention, and
2. They create an equality of respect, through the habit of mutual use.
Although rich people may pay more for a train or a park, when they ride the train or walk in the park, they are equal in social status to everyone else on the train or in the park.
This creates a feeling of equality throughout society.
1/Here's a thread in which the Economist's Mike Bird tries to rebut my recent post about decoupling. I think this thread is useful for understanding why the doubters are making the mistakes that they're making.