Maya Forstater Profile picture
Aug 23, 2019 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The performance of the liberal legal commentator blokes who have sought to be the 'voice of reason' on the sex and gender debates, sitting above the 'toxic' and furious and women, while refusing to engage with the content of what women are saying is telling
It shows how if you are not willing to challenge the foundational logic of the trans rights activist orgs like RightsInfo, Mermaids, Gendered Intelligence etc.. that "transwomen are women & anything else is transphobic" then you will have to throw women under every bus that comes
Because its no good just saying 'balancing rights' in theory, you have to be willing to be able to stand up for women some time. Males in women's prisons? Males playing contact rugby with women? These are extreme examples of real harms to women really happening ...
If you won't draw a line to protect women from discrimination, harassment & physical harm here, where will you draw it? But drawing the line anywhere means standing up to the bullies, including the economic bullies & that is too much to ask. So could women please just shut up?
The tragedy of all this is that there really is need for a grown up debate about how to protect women's rights & trans people's rights. As @GoonerProf points out, it starts w recognising that sex & being trans are different (as are disability, age etc...) forwomen.scot/public-meeting…
Thats why the Equality Act has separate protected characteristics. Sex =/= gender identity fairplayforwomen.com/single-sex/ Including trans people in public life does not depend on undermining women and girls boundaries, and their ability to organise politically.
That no grown up organisations have been willing to stand up (including orgs like @fawcettsociety) is why guys who i am sure are lovely & clever in other spheres are able to mistake their shallow pronouncements on this for wisdom & use any excuse for not listening to women
But women are not shutting up. And men are speaking up too. Time to be brave!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

Jun 7
The belief discrimination case of Ricky Garrett v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust has been overturned on appeal.

Mr Garrett was a litigant in person.

The original tribunal found that he had been discriminated against for his belief that "we are all one (human) race" and his non-belief in systemic racism, when, following a complaint about an overheard conversation he was ordered to write an academically referenced written reflection on systemic racism.
This was the original conduct - a discussion with a colleague following workplace promotion of the idea of systemic racism with which Mr Garrett disagreed. Image
The investigation said his misconduct wasn't about him disagreeing with the theory of systemic racism but the way that he said it.

He was told to write an academically referenced essay to see if his position changed. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 6
Thank you to @louie_french, Shadow Minister for Shadow Minister for Culture, Media and Sport for coming to the launch of our report Getting Back on Track: using the Equality Act to enable and protect sport for women and girls at the House of Lords this week.

It was such a good event!Image
@sharrond62 hosted and @wsusportsunion @Womeninsport_uk @SportSEENuk and @WomensRightsNet were in attendance. Image
Everyone wanted to talk about how the Equality Act works in sport. Image
Read 13 tweets
May 23
The @EHRC says that information about sex is "likely to constitute special category data for the purposes of the Data Protection Act and UKGDPR".

It gives no caselaw for this. Image
This means that organisations that are following the code would need revise their data protection policies and train all their staff.

Organisations like... the EHRC...

Whose own data protection policy doesn't say anything about treating sex as special category data.

equalityhumanrights.com/about-us/conta…Image
Read 11 tweets
May 13
The OfS-Sussex judgement is logically flawed and can't be allowed to stand. @ObhishekSaha with a very good analogy about paths.

Sussex's defence was that it had a high level sign saying "this path will only be closed for very good reasons". Therefore it must have had a very good reason 🙄

timeshighereducation.com/opinion/ofs-su…
I really like this footpath analogy...

In order to keep the footpath functionally open the local authority has to apply some rules to the users of the path. It has a duty to keep the path open for cyclists and pedestrians, but not for motorbikes. This is in the bye-laws

(this is the university's equality act compliant equality policy that is part of its governance)
There are some short parts of the path that are so unavoidably narrow that the local authority puts up signs saying "cyclists dismount here" to keep the whole path safe and open for all users.

That is fine, the path is still open to pedestrians and cyclists.

(that's a proportionate means to a legitimate aim in the Equality Act, its "no noisy protests that disrupt exams")
Read 5 tweets
Apr 9
This is quite the exercise in missing the point by Prof Shreya Atrey in Modern Law Review.

FWS will have a severe impact on "transgender, gender fluid, gender non-conforming, polygender, genderqueer and intersex" it says (without defining any of these terms).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/14…Image
Remember, FWS was just about whether a GRC changes a person's sex for the purpose of the Equality Act.
Atrey says the protected characteristic of sex should be amended to include sex characteristics, gender, gender identity, gender expression and gender performance. 🤨 Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
A curious thing about the draft government guidance: It has no conceptual underpinning at all

“In recent years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of children who are questioning the way they feel about being a boy or a girl, including the physical attributes of their sex and the related ways in which they fit into society. “

Er ok…🤷‍♀️
It then dives into “where a child or their parent has raised a request relating to social transition”

The phrase appears 29 times in the guidance, but is never explained what it means or what it might involve.
The schools are told they must "consider what is in the best interests of the child and other children, and a decision relating to social transition may not be the same as a child’s wishes. "
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(