“The pay-off of a human venture is, in general, inversely proportional to what it is expected to be”
Interesting.
Expert/Non-Expert distinction == distinction in narrating ability ?
“I disagree with followers of Marx and those of Adam Smith: the reason free markets work is because they allow people to be lucky, thanks to aggressive trial and error, not by giving rewards or incentives for skill.”
“Successions of anecdotes selected to fit a story do not constitute evidence. Anyone looking for confirmation will find enough of it to deceive himself - and no doubt his peers.”
The funny thing about Taleb is that his books are often contradictions.
They contain many anecdotes. An irony considering the quote above.
He uses narratives to demonstrate the dangers of the narrative fallacy.
“You need a story to displace a story.”
“Our minds are wonderful explanation machines, capable of making sense out of almost anything, capable of mounting explanations for all manner of phenomena, and generally incapable of accepting the idea of unpredictability.”
“Categorizing is necessary for humans, but it becomes pathological when the category is seen as definitive, preventing people from considering the fuzziness of boundaries, let alone revising their categories.”
“In general positive Blck Swans take time to show their effect while negative ones happen very quickly - it is much easier and much faster to destroy than to build.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A few months ago I tweeted a quote from Jordan Peterson that I felt summed up the politcal-economic tradeoff quite nicely: "Innovation is paid for with inequality."
2/ Now, I have come to believe that this tradeoff is mistaken. The mistake's origin, I believe, lies in conflating economic equality and economic mobility, or at least in thinking that these are positively correlated, when in fact the opposite holds more truth.
3/ These two passages from @nntaleb, the first from Skin in the Game and the second from The Black Swan turned my worldview on this topic upside down.
1/ The TALKERS want to sell you complex but fast solutions because their incentives are aligned to do so. Complex to justify they are needed and fast because it sells easier than the slow.
2/ Those that DO quickly find out that solutions in reality are simple, but slow and compounding.
3/ I certainly don't claim to be one of these DOers, but the areas in which I have seen to most personal growth happen to be the areas I employ the simplest strategies. 1.Fitness2.Education (mental model acquisition).
Some thoughts on the skin in the game of our thoughts/ideas/mental models and @tegmark's Life 1.0/2.0/3.0.
Thread 👇
1/ A system learns best via negativa- filtering out the less optimal parts and therefore allocating more resources to the more optimal parts. The bad pilots are at the bottom of the ocean. The worst capital allocators in a market ran out of money.
2/ But @nntaleb, in Antifragile, argues against the idea that individuals grow in low-survival circumstances like concentration camps, arguing instead that the camp acts as a filter (the no-absorbing-barrier) on the camp system as a whole, not on the individual system level.