Alex Usher Profile picture
Aug 25, 2019 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
So one thing that is not sufficiently understood about Canada's PSE system is how different Ontario is from everyone else when it comes to funding. Here's ON v. Rest of Canada, revenues as a percentage of GDP: they are basically mirror images, one publicly-funded, the other not.
Here's what Ontario and the rest of Canada look like compared to other countries. Ontario's funding is basically indistinguishable from America's and Chile's and quite similar to Japan, Korea and UK. The ROC looks a lot more European, like Sweden in fact.
This gets even crazier if you break provinces out individually. Every province has public funding above OECD average. QC, PE, NL and NS all have public funding levels as high as any country in OECD *and* have a bunch of private funding on top.
Anyways, worth thinking about: in terms of funding, Canadian PSE is actually an America (Ontario), with an ultra-Europe (Rest of Canada) tacked on.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Usher

Alex Usher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexUsherHESA

Oct 11, 2023
I am unimaginably angry at how unserious Canada has become in the last 25 years. Around the turn of the millieemium, we had a chance to be a great country. We pretended we were richer than we are, and we squandered what little money we had of investing in things that matter.
Since 2000, a number of things have gone badly wrong, including:

1) We let SUFA founder and we've now forgotten how to approach federalism properly.
2) We allowed public service atrophy, and so it can no longer make policy effectively (we should have moved in SG direction)
3) We reduced the GST for no reason at all, thus impairing fiscal capacity
4) We threw money at a sub-par health care instead of reforming it (while simultaneously pretending this gave us some kind of moral superiority)
5) We utterly failed on housing and construction
Read 9 tweets
Aug 25, 2023
1/ A short history of Public-Private Partnership Arrangements at Ontario Colleges (or, why it's utterly ludicrous that the feds are taking the shit for all this student visa stuff)
2/ The first ones started around 2013: a couple of non-GTA colleges thinking they could more easily attract students if they had a campus in the GTA. Of course, they weren;t going to build their own: so they hit on the idea of sub-contracting their curriculum to private colleges.
3/ Technically, the public colleges remain completely responsible for these students. It's their curriculum, it's their diplomas up for grabs. It's their recruitment process. If you think it is all "garbage curriculum" or whatever, your beef is with public not private colleges
Read 17 tweets
Aug 25, 2023
1/ After 3 days of tweeting (in part) about international students I have come to the conclusion that Ontario's public colleges are master strategists. Not because of the way they make money off their PPP arrangements with private colleges. No, I'm talking about the comms job.
2/ There is a substantial percentage of the Canadian population which loses its mind when it hears "private" and "education" in the same sentence. And so when they hear that the Toronto "campuses" of certain Ontario colleges are PPPs, they immediatey glom onto the second P.
3/ "Something is bad about a public-private partnership?" they yell. "Boo privates!"

So the publics get a pass on the fact that they are the ones making the admissions decisions, and taking a cut of every student as a pass-through to the private.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 24, 2023
1/ I have a theory about how the feds lost control of the student visa file. It stems from something that happened at a GAC consultation I was at a few wks ago, in which a GAC official expressed surprise/consternation that unis were using PGWVs as a recuitment tool.
2/ "This university President stood up at a recruiting event in Dubai and said "study at my institution and you can stay and live in Canada", the GAC official spluttered. "That's not right! That's not what the program is for!"

Swear to God this is true. My jaw was on the floor.
3/ I've been pondering for weeks how a relatively senior public official could say something like that with a straight face, I've seen federal public servants lack cluefuless wrt how their programs work in practice, but never like this.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 23, 2023
1/ The real problem with the federal approach to student visas/housing is that if you listen to them, it's genuinely unclear what problem they think they are trying to solve. This is going to lead to some truly crap policy-making.
2/ Obviously the proximate cause is the housing affordability crisis. But to a substantial degree the housing/student visa nexus is an ON/BC/NS problem: why create national policy that will sideswipe institutions elsewhere?
3/ But let the feds talk even for two seconds re: this issue and they switch from housing to "unscrupulous private colleges". This seems to be a significant misreading of what's going on in Ontario. Yes, private colleges are involved, but mostly as agents of public ones.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 16, 2023
Who thinks they know what duties of "member" of the Trudeau Foundation are? No googling.

(hint: "Members" are not Directors. They are the product of a very weird era in Ottawa budget making and currently only exist in a half-dozen or so orgs, to my knowledge at least)
OK, I'll tell you. When the feds started "endowing" organizations left right and centre (CFI, Millennium Scholarships, Trudeau Fdn), mainly as a way to get rid if surplus money at the end of a fiscal, they had a standard way of setting up an accountability structure.
Obviously, you needed a Board of Directors to whom management was accountable. But to whom were the Board Directors accountable? In a private corporation, that would be shareholders; in a public corporation it is the government (or crown, or whatever).
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(