Stalin was a mass-murdering shithead and people need to hear that more.
Man there are some STRONG feelings out there about Soviet contributions in WWII
Usually tied to Soviet body count, which isn't surprising. You can't lose 20 million people without it being a pretty big deal
But.
Body counts are not a determination of success.
The Soviets were able to fight their way back due to Allied investment, Allied supplies, manpower reserves, and national will -- not just national will and manpower reserves alone. Also, that the Japanese did not try a redux of the Russo-Japanese War.
(also, Stalin is still a mass murdering shithead, responsible for between 6-9 million deaths of his own people)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I'm finishing up Sears' "Lincoln's Lieutenants" for the 2d time, and it remains an exceptional work. One of the most solid examinations of brigade and higher leadership of the Army of the Potomac that exists. But while I love everything Sears does, he's in the tactics trap
For example, he has nothing but disdain for Sigel and Butler, and other "political" generals
And yes, from a tactical level, they're not great. Not really bringing in the battlefield Ws
But that's only half the story.
By keeping Franz Sigel in a US Army uniform, Lincoln is ensuring continued German American enlistments
Political generals ensure continued Congressional and state financial and materiel support for the war
There's a decent chance y'all are gonna hear about some conspiracy theorist shit from the 1600s based on my consumption of the alcohols this evening
This acts as your WARNORD
So, like, be warned or whatever
Ok so like, you think America today is bad with conspiracy theories
I mean, it's pretty shitty, I won't lie, but it's got nothin on 1689 when everyone apparently lost their shit and just decided to overthrow govt
This historic rant brought to you by 3 incredibly generous G&Ts
Look, it's the 1680s,and shit in the English colonies on north America is getting weird af. Lots of pacts and shit for common defense against those evil papist French who are hiding behind every tree and also probs behind you right now
Modern war remains artillery intensive. Ever since the Russo-Japanese War of 1904, belligerents have been constrained by availability of artillery ammunition. To believe that precision fires significantly changes this is to live in a delusional world. We need more production.
And for the love of the gods, spare me with the "faltering offensive" takes. Operational offensives require mass reserves and mass logistics, as well as incredibly difficult synchronization of combined arms -- and they don't look flashy. They are nasty, grinding, bloody things
If you can achieve a breakthrough, you need more reserves, more logistics to sustain the momentum, but it's very very hard to predict where a breakthrough will happen and then quickly mass combat power at that site. Technology cannot eliminate the tyranny of time and space
I may have had some wine and yo, if you think this was the first time in American history a presidential candidate tried this exact thing, baby, have I got a story for you
It's been a hot minute since we did some #drunjhistory huh
So it's 1876, and America is, as many historians have said, a hot ass mess
Like, former treasoners in the south are actively fighting the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments and using lots of violence to try to keep white supremacy, US troops are actively fighting them
The election is between Rutherford Hayes, who ate a bullet at South mountain in 62 so you know he's a badass G, and samuel tilden, who's like, a guy. He opposed Lincoln but was like "I guess the union is ok"
And the election is TIGHT. CLOSW. LIKE. super duper close
Teaching cadets about the 2003 invasion of Iraq...They would look at me quizzically after doing the reading, saying "this still doesn't make sense, everyone knew this was a bad idea, why did it happen?"
I'd sigh, and say
"Well, you kinda had to be there at the time"
Well that blew up. Been off Twitter all day.
A few thoughts
One, I was one of those neocons who thought it was a good idea - all of 17 years old, of course. I believed that we wouldn't go to war without true and valid reasons for doing so. I was one of many, many Americans
Two, with the cadets, we had just emerged from a discussion on Vietnam and the Powell Doctrine. They were flabbergasted that Powell agreed to such an open violation of his principles. We spent a lot of time discussing hindsight, politics, and a nation's emotional reaction to 9/11