1/x Short thread on why all journalists ought to read @BernieSanders' (very good) @CJR essay: "we do not have enough real journalism in America right now is because many outlets are being gutted by the same forces of greed that are pillaging our economy. " cjr.org/opinion/bernie…
@BernieSanders@CJR 2/x For awhile, I've been saying journalists need to reckon with the fact that ***IF*** we want to practice journalism professionally and full time w the resources needed, we must create the economic conditions for journalism to exist in U.S. society
@BernieSanders@CJR 3/x This means giving up the idea of "objectivity" (itself a lie) & instead embracing that journalists have a LONG history of subjectively embracing trying to create/bolster a society which they think will allow journalism to flourish.
I.E...
@BernieSanders@CJR 4/x ...major journalists and news outlets have long supported the U.S. military (abroad & at home), police departments, business & industry under the naive belief that a (so-called) "free market" & American Democracy™️ were needed for a "free press" to exist.
1. Many journos who support the US military/police STILL cling to a fiction of objectivity. (What they really support is the status quo of a certain race/class/nationality)
2. The voracious "free market" depends on an ever weaker press
@BernieSanders@CJR 6/x How can anyone argue a "free market" allows for a free press?
San Francisco is one of the densest concentrations of wealth the world has ever seen.
@BernieSanders@CJR 7/x Press in NYC, a global center of finance, is still going but is constantly under assault.
There is no lack of capital sloshing around.
There is a lack of will for it to be shared in projects which benefit the many, such as journalism—and @BernieSanders outlines this well.
@BernieSanders@CJR 8/x Journalists cannot rely upon the benevolence of oligarchs to keep the presses churning & the servers streaming; as I wrote a couple weeks ago, @nbj914 was doing wonders w @PacificStand. Patrons can—and do—pull out anytime.
@BernieSanders@CJR@nbj914@PacificStand 9/x The Intercept, funded by a billionaire, had cut backs...at a moment when a pub based in the US and Brazil could not be in need of more, not less, robust coverage.
Journalism as a profession needs to push for the economic conditions to exist...
@BernieSanders@CJR@nbj914@PacificStand 10/x And why should the profession be afraid of embracing a political/econ agenda for it to exist? Many other (more nefarious) professions have no compunction about trying to create an environment in which they can survive.
Journalists already form unions, have trade groups...
@BernieSanders@CJR@nbj914@PacificStand 11/x Journalism would do well—like coal, oil & corn—to demand all POTUS candidates give a detailed plan like @BernieSanders' of how the profession will do under their administration...which would require a society w decent wages, affordable housing & breathable air FOR journos
@BernieSanders@CJR@nbj914@PacificStand 12/x As 2020 nears, if journos don't try to create a society in which they themselves (& the profession) can exist, then they themselves (& the profession) will be relegated to more consolidation, less autonomy & less freedom—as @BernieSanders outlines cjr.org/opinion/bernie…
@BernieSanders@CJR@nbj914@PacificStand 13/x Too many journalism fix schemes involve, "Let's see if we can hack/disrupt within the current, ever more dystopian, militaristic, economic horror show."
But what if such crumbs aren't enough & journalism needs...
For people who think I am close-minded and unbending: I have done a 180° on assisted suicide, and I changed my mind by reading and thinking with disabled scholars and activists
I actually do think people should be able to end their lives if they wish, with compassion and as little pain and stigma as possible. (My biological mother took her life in a gruesome, violent way.) And I think almost everything should be decriminalized. Unfortunately…
the PUSH for assisted suicide is not rooted in reducing stigma or compassion, nor is it rooted in getting folks what they need to address the root causes of their suicidal desire (housing, poverty, proper mental and physical healthcare)…
This is *still*’ interesting. When Oprah was the host of the Oprah Winfrey Show and endorsed Obama, the candidate did not pay for the show—Oprah (Harpo Productions) did. When Oprah endorsed Harris, the candidate paid for the show. An important power shift in media.
Of course Oprah, a billionaire, could have paid her staff as her quite legal contribution to the cause. Instead she let, perhaps, Black women earning minimum wage who wanted to see Harris elected and gave their meagre earnings to the campaign pay for it instead.
What’s most interesting to me as a media scholar: @JonnyDiamond added a line to my @lithub column about the Winfrey endorsement that it was “basically a recreation of the Oprah Winfrey Show”—and now Oprah is literally admitting that! lithub.com/in-american-em…
If you accept the truth that under Obama/Biden/Harris, more people
— were deported
— died of Covid
— were killed in genocide and wars w US weapons & $
then there is no need to panic about Trump/Miller/RFK. Hold onto your folks, your values & your work. Stay the course. Calm!
Panic, in general, helps no one. It keeps you from breathing right, it keeps you from seeing clearly. Lots of folx have been working hard to get vaccines (Covid/flu/mpox) out as Biden dismantled Covid vax infrastructure. Work & learn w us, we’ve been at it for yrs now
An asset we may have: millions who passively accepted Obama deportations, Biden vax delivery destruction & Biden/Harris genocide might now be angry abt Trump doing these things. WELCOME THEM GRACIOUSLY WITH OPEN ARMS! ALL HANDS ON DECK!
1/4 I filed for tenure today, as has been planned for years. It has been too much pressure being investigated while also filing for tenure (a huge moment in any scholar's life in the best of circumstances), so imagonnatakeaminute to sit with what I have accomplished. I WROTE
Class time: Let's use the Overton Window to discuss how pagers-as-booby-traps is really bad for humanity, and how journalists are already failing at this basic test of ethics and morality.
The Overton Window was developed to address what topics can be debated, or not, in news media. (It is named for political scientist Joseph Overton, who was not an egomaniac; his colleague Joseph Lehman named it for him after his death.)
For instance, in my lifetime and career, gay rights have gone from being too taboo to write about in almost any mainstream media; now, being explicitly anti-gay isn't much allowed in mainstream media (though, notably, being explicitly anti-transgender IS still on the window).
BOOM! I am back in the saddle for the fall as a regular @lithub columnist with an exclusive essay on "False Profits: Why I Am Not Teaching in the Classroom This Fall" lithub.com/false-profits-…
(It’s not often I get to quote my divas @pocojump, Blanche Devereux and Zora Neale Hurston all in one piece)
I wrap up the essay mediating on 2 quotes from MLK's final speech: "Somewhere I read of the freedom of assembly. Somewhere I read of the freedom of speech. Somewhere I read of the freedom of press. Somewhere I read that the greatness of America is the right to protest for right."