A Crime a Day Profile picture
Aug 26, 2019 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The federal government actually has a history of trying to change the weather by blowing stuff up in the sky.

On February 27, 1891, Robert Dyrenforth was appointed "Special Agent of the Department of Agriculture for Making Experiments in the Production of Rainfall."
That was only after a Confederate general had already patented exploding balloons as a means for making it rain.
But, the feds hired Dyrenforth (not a scientist) to go start blowing stuff up. They gave him $9,000. And he issued a pretty comprehensive report:
He used exploding balloons and even kites with dynamite attached.

People wrote letters begging him to stop:
When none of that seemed to work, he started blowing up prairie dog and badger holes because... well... because:
Eventually, the government stopped pursuing the bomb-kite strategy and moved on to other means of weather modification. In fiscal year 1966, the federal government was spending about $7 million on weather modification efforts.
Reports submitted to Congress also noted the efforts of *other* countries:
But then, in 1972, the New York Times reported on a secret cloud seeding program conducted by the United States to cause rainfall over Vietnam and Laos: nytimes.com/1972/07/03/arc…
The program was first revealed with the release of the Pentagon papers. That same year, Congress passed a new statute requiring the reporting of weather modification activities.
Then, in 1977, the United States entered into a multilateral convention to prohibit military use of weather modification techniques.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A Crime a Day

A Crime a Day Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CrimeADay

Aug 8, 2021
Excuse me. That's pasteurized process CHEESE FOOD to you, and 21 USC §333 & 21 CFR §133.173(a)(1) make it a federal crime to sell it unless it's made in a homogeneous plastic mass.
To suggest we Americans don't have "proper" cheese is an outrage. Under §133.173(a)(6), we are willing to send people to prison if they sell blue, nuworld, roquefort, gorgonzola, or limburger cheese food if those fancy cheeses make up less than 10% of the weight. See? Standards.
And those slices are a scientific masterpiece, by the way. It's a crime to sell them if they contain more than 0.03% lecithin as an anti-sticking agent as required by §133.173(e)(8) and punishable under 21 USC §333. We aren't savages.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 3, 2021
These examples sure feel familiar.
now wait just one darn second here...
Read 5 tweets
Jun 6, 2020
It's now been one year since the release of my book, How to Become a Federal Criminal: An Illustrated Handbook for the Aspiring Offender.

So I wanted to take a minute to thank you all for some of the highlights over this past year.

amazon.com/How-Become-Fed…
There was, of course, that time the @nytimes ran this wonderful book review, in which the book was called "an excellent book for people who like to start sentences with 'Did you know that …'"

nytimes.com/2019/05/23/boo…
Then there was that time a federal prison banned my book for illustrating how to make illegal booze:

Read 12 tweets
Jun 3, 2020
This Twitter feed shouldn’t exist.
This feed posts one federal criminal provision every day and has since July 2014. That’s almost six years of crimes: more than 2,000 ways to become a federal criminal in America.
Some sound silly. Some are ridiculously vague and poorly written. And for the topical ones—well, there probably shouldn’t be a federal criminal law for every single occasion.
Read 8 tweets
May 16, 2019
In 1873, Congress passed the Comstock Act, which made it a federal crime to import or transport in interstate commerce virtually any information about contraception or abortion.
The Supreme Court’s decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade effectively rendered the criminal prohibitions on distributing information about abortion and contraception a nullity, though those provisions were never repealed.
Today, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461 and 1462 still reflect these (defunct) provisions banning the importation, transportation, or mailing of even truthful information about abortion or contraception.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(