People have been talking a lot about Pride, especially the Manchester one, and the big stars, social exclusion etc.
For what it's worth, I think it all started to go wrong in 1992. /1
Prior to that, the Pride marches I went on in London were pretty loose affairs - you turned up at the Embankment, found a place with your mates, marched to Westminster and ended up in Kennington, where Tom Robinson would play a set. Approk 45k in all. /2
Then, in 1992, London hosted the first Euro-Pride. It was amazing. Banarama! Other famous people! A fair ground, and all sorts of new stuff, with attendance reckoned to be 100k. Biggest ever. Glad I was there. But ... /3
Next year, a decision was made to have the same sort of thing. And I think, in retrospect, that did two things: 1. It overshadowed Berlin's EuroPride, which was a massive shame 2. It encouraged a "bigger is better" mantra, and forced rather than organic growth. /4
And from there we've had familiar stories - Pride being promoted on Clapham Common as a "free music festival", in Finsbury Park with aggressive ticketing policies and sponsors drinks the only ones for sale.
Lots of fuss about sponsors, and headliners, and less politics /5
Less opportunity for anyone to just come along and turn up on the day with their mates. And yes, there were failures and collapses along the way.
I'm very glad that @PrideInLondon doesn't have a ticketed area in town; that would be awful, in my view. /6
Anyone can still go to soho and celebrate with their friends. And I don't really begrudge the £1/head cost of marching (though wish it were easier for non-groups, ie mates, to do it, like in the old days). /7
The Pride I enjoyed most recently was probably 2013, when Italian Pride was held in Palermo, with a "pride village" that felt like a special space just for us.
I'd love to get some of that feel back - but perhaps that's partly nostalgia, and the novelty of being somewhere new. /8
But I do very much believe it has to be accessible to all - the gay scene as a whole is not always great at that - expensive drinks, and so on - and for our one special day, surely we should make it easy for the less well off to take part, not price them out with access fees /9
And the big acts? Again, fun, but not so much fun when they start to become the whole point of the things, and when plenty of fans (not all of whom our allies) buy up tickets. An LGBT+ space becomes less of one when that happens. /10
At a time when the far right is on the rise, and elements of that are all too keen to take away our rights, when people are attacked on buses and in the streets, we need to keep the politics in Pride. /11
And if we are talking the politics of inclusion, sticking up for trans people - both at home and abroad - and for the victimised, then absolutely we should also be talking about inclusion of the less well off amongst us. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm going to expand on this a little. Note, I don't really want to tell you how to vote, but I do think people should carefully consider the impact of their choices, and issues like PrEP and HIV treatment are very important.
If you followed the campaigning for access to #PrEP in the UK, you'll remember there were many vocal people against it (even amongst the gay community).
Their argument, essentially, why should the NHS pay for gay men to have unprotected sex.
That's a gross simplification, but it's what many people feel: "they should just use condoms, not expect free drugs," even despite years of "just use a condom" messages clearly not stopping the spread of HIV.
Now, what happens if the cost of PrEP were to go up after a trade deal?
We started 2018 with our first event #BLUFclub stand at Leather Pride in Belgium, which was great fun.
We also launched our first iPhone app, added a US gear store, and hosted almost 200 events in 30 cities - thanks to our volunteers around the world for that
We turned 21, and over 400 people joined the club this year.
And, of course, we had our legal problems in Berlin. I'm tremendously grateful to all who helped with that, both financially and giving me moral support
We raised a record amount this year - but a massive chunk of that has been spent on legal fees. We now own the right to our name, across the EU. Thanks also to our amazing lawyers in Munich
OK, so where does #BLUFclub stand on trans issues, and things like self-ID? Well, broadly speaking, since it's not a democracy, it stands more or less where I do, since I set policy. So, let's look more at that, shall we?
Firstly, the vast majority of applications to BLUF have always been done online, without an applicant having to be seen in person. Nor have we ever required proof of identification, still less of gender.
The requirement to join is that you are a man, and you meet the dresscode. The bulk of our members are gay, and it would be fair to call us a gay club. But we have straight members, and bi members too.