As a historian of race, civil rights, and education, I can sadly predict the response of white, ostensibly progressive New Yorkers to proposed school desegregation plans. Expect a lot of anger couched (nearly always) in race neutral language.
Let's begin with the guiding assumption--ignorant but widely held--that "ability" tests are inherently race-neutral, and that measures of "giftedness" and "talent" are objective and fair...even when parents pay for test prep for little kids.
With that in mind expect one or more of the following arguments...
-- "This will irreparably harm [my] gifted children."
--"I can't sacrifice my kid's education for an experiment."
"Eliminating gifted and talented classes will drag down the quality of education."
"This is so unfair... a) to gifted children who need a highly stimulating curriculum or b) those to kids who aren't prepared for an academically challenging curriculum." (The feint of caring for the interests of kids unlike your own).
"Everyone who can will flee to the suburbs." (Also the corollary from white suburbanites who crow "Thank god we moved to Scarsdale/New Canaan/Chappaqua when we did.")
"Real estate values in the city will drop."
All of these are based on some bedrock beliefs (masked by "colorblind" language)that parents who pay a premium in real estate prices to send their kids to a "good" school (with "gifted" and "talented" classes) deserve the best...
That the presence of a large number of white, "gifted" students is evidence of a school's success and, vice versa, that schools with large populations of non-white students are inherently "failing"
That a neighborhood or a city's desirability is measured by a large presence of white people living in places with ever-escalating property values
At core, parents accept that there's something natural and inevitable about the sorting of students by ability, the sorting of schools by the race of their student bodies, and the sorting of school attendance zones and districts by socio-economic status and property values.
This is, in other words, a story about how whites naturalize racial inequality without burning crosses, reading white supremacist literature, and dropping the n-word.
Go no further for an explanation of why New York remains at the top of the list of most-racially segregated school systems in the United States.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Thread: Why we should be very troubled about the hasty deployment of police to put down campus protests: a) police response is disproportionate b) campus raids accelerate disruption & distrust, reduce safety c) use of force legitimates future authoritarian responses to dissent.
2/ Let's begin with proportionality. Case: @NYUniversity, 5/3/24. The massive influx of riot-gear clad police, who far outnumbered the protestors, was unwarranted. The arrest of nonviolent protestors is absurdly disproportionate to any harms they are alleged to have perpetrated.
@nyuniversity 3/The NYU blockade is what historians of the law & policing call a status crime, basically victimless, minus the trivially inconvenienced pedestrians like me. It might violate university policy but that doesn't justify the use of force, raid, arrests.
Thread: I don’t get outraged easily, but @Columbia’s decision to call NYPD to arrest 108 protestors was unconscionable. It raises troubling questions about the university's leadership and even more important moral questions: How should we deal with dissent and disagreement?
2/I entered @Columbia in 1980. The campus was still in the long shadow of 1968, still traumatized by the memory of the police raid that year but nonetheless a hotbed of student activism.
@Columbia 3/Over my four years there, students and outside groups regularly held demonstrations at the Sundial and on the steps of Low Library. I joined many of those protests—against U.S. support for dictatorships in Latin America, against apartheid in South Africa, for peace.
1/ I have a lot to say about AHA president John Sweet's criticism of "presentism," but it is perhaps best summed up in the title of my 1998 article, "Responsibility to the Past, Engagement with the Present." tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
2/ I wrote: "Historians are in a unique position to throw a wrench into public policy debates--many of which rest on simplistic, often erroneous assumptions about the past."
3/ I elaborated on this in an interview with @julianzelizer: "I don't believe that historians should become propagandists. That we should skew the results of our scholarship to further our political goals at the moment." albany.edu/jmmh/vol2no1/s…
1/ #Redlining is in the news: in today's @NYTimes, columnist John McWhorter challenges what he sees as conventional wisdom on racially discriminatory housing by reporting that 82% of residents of redlined neighborhoods in ten large cities were white. nytimes.com/2021/09/28/opi…
2/To the untutored, this might be shocking, but historians have long known that ethnicity and immigration status were sometimes factors in redlining. Dig a bit for references to white “aliens” and “immigrants,” including Italians, Poles, and Jews here: dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redli…
3/ McWhorter reports accurately—in a sort of both-sides way—the far more shocking fact that “over 97 percent of Black individuals and 95 percent of Black-owned homes ended up in red-shaded HOLC zones.”
Another tiresome and utterly predictable jeremiad about the history profession that misses the innovation that has remade the field in recent decades. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
One reason that more American universities don't have "War Studies" departments is that the study of war is integrated into the subfields of political, social, economic, and cultural history in ways unimaginable forty or fifty years ago.
A few examples. Former Penn historian and Harvard president @DrewFaust28 (she of the department that Max Hastings singles out for its supposed lack of interest in war) redefined the field with her Journal of American History article "Altars of Sacrifice." academic.oup.com/jah/article/76….
1/ NYC data on demographics of those who have received COVID-19 vaccines to date. The picture isn't pretty. 29.2% of city residents are Latino. They are overrepresented among essential workers, most vulnerable to infection, but make up only 15% of those vaccinated.
2/ Only 11% of African Americans--24.3 percent of New Yorkers--have received vaccines. Predominantly African American neighborhoods in the city have been hit especially hard by the pandemic.
3/ Whites are over represented among those who have been vaccinated thus far. New York City's population is 42.7% white, but whites make up 48% of those vaccinated.