Will Stancil Profile picture
Aug 27, 2019 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Okay, important HOUSING CIVIL RIGHTS ALERT: Trump is currently trying to shoot a bunch of holes in the Fair Housing Act. They're trying to insert a huge carveout, especially for financial institutions, in the part of the Act that bars racial segregation and discrimination.
There's actually something you can do it about sitting that'll only take a minute and doesn't require you to leave your computer - yes, you, random Twitter person - but I'm going to do a little thread about why it's important so folks have context.
So, right now, the Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to create racial disparities in access to housing - including by creating housing segregation. It doesn't matter if you're a public or private entity, and it doesn't matter if the discrimination was unintentional!
It took fair housing advocates 47 years after the passage of the Act - i.e., until 2015 - to get the Supreme Court to admit the existence of this part of the law. It was a huge win for civil rights...

and now, after only 4 years, Trump's HUD is trying to dispose of it.
(Here is where I note that Trump's first act in public life was facing a fair housing complaint for barring black people from his buildings.)
HUD is undercutting the Fair Housing Act by redrafting the rule that lays out disparate impact liability, to add a bunch of conditions and exemptions. They claim to be following the 2015 Supreme Court case, but they've added a bunch of stuff that has nothing to do with the case.
There are many problems with the new rule, but the worst part is probably a giant carveout for algorithms, which would essentially exempt all financial institutions from having to worry about discrimination or segregation AT ALL. It's bonkers.
Even if Dems win in 2020, to reverse this they'd have to go through the whole rulemaking process again. That can be blocked and takes years (which is why Trump has only gotten around to doing it in late 2019). So it's MUCH better to stop the new rule now than to fix it later.
Here's the thing: HUD has to read and address comments it receives on the rule. Civil rights organizations have set up an online portal to submit those comments. You can go here and tell HUD to abandon the rule right now. It'll take less than a minute. defendcivilrights.org/make-a-comment
There's a form letter if you're not sure what to say, and that's totally fine, but if you've got more thoughts, that's even better. You don't have to be an expert, at all.
If you want to see some specific problems and language to complain about, here's a thread talking about the awful algorithmic exclusion. Again, they have to address your comments, regardless of whether you're an expert:
And here's an article giving an overview of the whole mess: citylab.com/equity/2019/08…
If you're even slightly concerned about housing discrimination or segregation I also recommend following @NAACP_LDF and @PRRAC_DC, diehard civil rights orgs that have been fighting racism for decades and haven't given an inch to the Trump administration.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Stancil

Will Stancil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whstancil

Apr 26
This kind of right-wing legalistic gaslighting is such a menace. The reason I know January 6 was an insurrection or coup is because I WATCHED IT LIVE. I watched Trump lie for months, give an incendiary speech, instruct Mike Pence to change the result, and send support to the mob.
This is Orwellian in the truest sense: authoritarians showing you something and then, gradually over time, chiseling away at your ability to see it clearly, with word games and logical tricks, until the thing that was as clear as day seems like nothing at all. DO NOT fall for it.
Trump tried to overthrow the government. He tried to have state and federal officials change the result. He tried to make his own Justice Department do it. And when that didn’t work, he incited an armed mob to attack and invade the US Capitol. None of that is exaggeration.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2
I think one of the worst pathologies of our time is the conviction among so many powerful people that "being reasonable" and "acting powerless" are the same thing - that reacting to events in any way, or attempt to effect change on the world, is inherently unserious.
It's a huge part of what has left our politics so paralyzed in response to things like Trump. "Wow, Trump's bad," some of the most powerful people on earth say. "It's crazy that he's running for reelection after attempting to overthrow the government. Hope he doesn't win!"
Something about the endless bubble of screens and news we live in has trained our society's leaders to believe they're not really part of the world, just observers of it. They've absorbed the passivity of the cable TV watcher or Twitter commenter.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 1
Reorienting the legal system to protect white people, regardless of whether it’s done under the guise of anti-anti-racism or whatever, is effectively the restoration of formal white supremacy. It was always inevitable that Trump’s far right would end up here.
This is the beating heart of Trump’s politics: taking the inchoate resentment of reactionary white people terrified that they are losing their racial privileges and using it to create a regime where those people can endlessly exact revenge on groups they believe subordinate.
“White reactionaries incorrectly believe they have been discriminated against and simply want to compete on level ground” - given that they ALREADY are competing with an advantage, what would a legal regime privileging this group look like?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 5
Biden has been the most progressive policy president in 50 years or more. He's enacted massive stimulus and climate bills, he's governed with a full-employment mindset that has created a booming economy for workers, he's appointed progressives across the federal government.
He's made great court appointments, stood up for labor unions like no president in history, and stood by an anti-monopoly FTC chair that has big business howling in anger. He's cancelled tons of student and tried to cancel more. He's done SO MUCH.
It is ALSO true that his opponent is undisguised fascist and rapist who previously tried to overthrow the government, campaigning on a platform of, quite literally, dictatorship, bloody revenge, and concentration camps for immigrants and other perceived undesirables.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
Again, this is not complicated: the fringe of people who are going to sit out this election to punish Biden from the left is quite small. But those people are noisy and contribute to a larger sense of apathy, that both parties are the same. And there are a LOT of apathetic voters
"Both parties are the same, this election doesn't matter, I won't vote or will just vote third party" is a very stupid idea that nonetheless seems to have some intrinsic appeal to a lot of people, and has repeatedly caused catastrophic election results (Bush 2000, Trump 2016)
We were able to beat Trump in 2020 in large part because there was widespread recognition of the stakes of the election (that's why turnout was the highest in history). But right now the public discourse is full of very loud voices playing DOWN the stakes
Read 4 tweets
Feb 29
It’s forgotten now but Dems spent the first 2.5 years of the Biden presidency intentionally slow-walking or closing down investigations of Trump while sternly declaring that they were “looking forward, not back”
The problem here was incredibly obvious at the time: if no one actually did the work of targeting Trump for his many outrageous acts, none of them would stick to him.
Remember that Mueller handed Garland an open-and-shut case against Trump, and instead of taking action, he simply let it expire. Dems didn’t investigate Trump and Russia. Only Jack Smith finally moved forward on an ACTUAL COUP ATTEMPT.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(