Things We Do For No Reason Profile picture
Aug 27, 2019 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/10
Why is the routine use of neuroimaging for hospitalized patients with delirium a #TWDFNR?

This #tweetorial is a supplement to the review published in the July 2019 issue of the @JHospMedicine

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
To understand why the routine use CT/MRI to evaluate delirium is a #TWDFNR, we must first recognize that many acute neurologic processes assessed with neuroimaging DO cause delirium.

Example:

💥13%-48% of patients with acute stroke have delirium💥

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.…
3/
Regarding neuroimaging in hospitalized patients with delirium, the authors of the #TWDFNR review cover four studies and note that the overall diagnostic yield is 2.7%-14.5%.

How do these values inform your interpretation of the utility of CT/MRI in this setting?
4/
Given that the findings on CT/MRI are often high stakes (e.g., subdural hematoma or metastases), I see these values as suggesting imaging has value.

But, the 2.7%-14.5% range includes patients with more clear indications for imaging (e.g., recent fall).
5/
If one excludes clearer indications for CT/MRI...

➢ focal neurologic deficit
➢ new decline in mental status
➢ anticoagulation
➢ recent fall

...the yield falls to 0%-1.5%.

How do these values inform your interpretation of the utility of neuroimaging in this setting?
6/
The authors argue that:

"While a rate of 1.5% may appear high for a serious outcome such as stroke or intracranial bleeding, it is comparable to rates reported for missed major cardiac events in clinical algorithms for evaluating chest pain."
7/
They also note that there are additional downsides to routinely obtaining neuroimaging in this setting, including:

➢ cost
➢ radiation exposure
➢ incidental findings
8/
What do you think?

Given a yield of 0%-1.5%, along with the potential downsides, is routinely obtaining neuroimaging in undifferentiated hospitalized patients with delirium a #TWDFNR?
9/
Before closing, here are the full recommendations offered by the authors of the #TWDFNR review.
10/10
To read more about this topic, download the Open Access article using the link below.

And, as always, if there are things you think are #TWDFNR, send us an email: TWDFNR@hospitalmedicine.org

…files-live.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/files/s3fs-pub…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Things We Do For No Reason

Things We Do For No Reason Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TWDFNR

Jun 4, 2019
1/9
Why is “HIT Testing in Low Probability Patients” a TWDFNR?

This tweetorial is a complement to the review published in the June 2019 issue of @JHospMedicine by authors Amanda Li, Lisa Hicks, and @efan75.

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
As the authors note, the ELISA test has a sensitivity >95% when the optical density threshold is low. The high sensitivity of the ELISA may make one inclined to use it liberally to evaluate for HIT.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26518436
3/
But, there is another way one can effectively rule-out HIT: the 4Ts score.

A 2012 meta-analysis determined that the negative predictive value of a low probability 4Ts score was 99.8%. And, it didn't matter who "performed" the scoring.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22990018
Read 9 tweets
Apr 24, 2019
1/
Why is "Routine Echocardiography in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism" a #TWDFNR?

This question was addressed in this month's @JHospMedicine by @PaulBerglMD et al.

Here's a thread to complement their awesome review.

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
Let's start with a case and question. The case is taken from the review by @PaulBerglMD et al. Review it and answer the question in tweet 3.
3/
Would you order suggest that this patient with stable pulmonary embolism (PE) undergo echocardiography (echo)?
Read 10 tweets
Feb 25, 2019
1/
Why is "Prescribing Docusate for Constipation in Hospitalized Adults" a #TWDFNR?

This thread is a complement to the recently published review of the same name, appearing in February 2019 issue of @JHospMedicine

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
Before discussing the review by Robert Fakheri and Frank Volpicelli, let's gauge current practice.

How do you currently use docusate in hospitalized adults with constipation?
3/
If you use docusate, you're not alone.

One single-center study found that docusate accounted for 64% of laxative doses. The cost: $60,000/year.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27323235
Read 9 tweets
Jan 24, 2019
1/
Why is the routine use of intermittent pneumatic compression for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical ward patients a #TWDFNR?

This thread is meant to complement the recently published article appearing in @JHospMedicine

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
First, a question: how often do you use intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) for venous thromboembolism in medical ward patients?
3/
One reason why you might be inclined to use IPC: it has proven effectiveness in high-risk populations (e.g., surgical, trauma, stroke).

For pulmonary embolism:
RR 0.48, 95% CI [0.33-0.69]
NNT = 63

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23852609
Read 6 tweets
Dec 10, 2018
1/ Why is "Prealbumin Testing to Diagnose Malnutrition in the Hospitalized Patient" a #TWDFNR?

This #tweetorial is meant to complement the recent publication of the same name in @JHospMedicine

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
Let’s start with two questions...

First: Do you use prealbumin as a “marker” of malnutrition?
3/
Second: How did prealbumin get its name?

[GE = gel electrophoresis]
Read 10 tweets
Nov 3, 2018
1/
Why is the acute treatment of "hypertensive urgency" a #TWDFNR?

This #tweetorial is meant to complement the recent publication: "Acute Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency" in @JHospMedicine

journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
2/
Case: A 71M with a history of HTN is hospitalized for cellulitis. On hospital day 2, the nurse pages you:

"Pt X with BP ____. Please advise". He has no symptoms or signs of end-organ damage.

What would be your threshold SBP to write for an as-needed anti-hypertensive?
3/
The treatment of hypertensive urgency is based on an assumption: if we do not lower the blood pressure now, something bad (e.g. stroke, MI, aortic dissection) will occur in the next few hours.

We aren't giving IV hydralazine to prevent a stroke two years from now...
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(