Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 28, 2019 31 tweets 16 min read Read on X
INX Media: Hearing in the Supreme Court on P Chidambaram's petition for anticipatory bail in case registered by the Enforcement Directorate begins.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta begins to make the submission for the agency.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
@dir_ed
@PChidambaram_IN
Every PMLA offence has two dimensions - predicate offence and laundering. Money laundering is a separate offence independent from the predicate/scheduled offence, Mehta.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
We would be dealing with very intelligent people. A stupid man cannot launder money. Money laundering requires layers and layers of concealment, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
These offences leave a money trail which needs to be tracked and the evidence is difficult to collect, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Most of the evidence is in the form of electronic format and within minutes of it being publicised or put before the Court, it will be gone, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
This is why evidence cannot be shared till the prosecution complaint (chargesheet in CrPC parlance) is filed, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Money laundering is independently a criminal offence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The statute stipulates the procedure of presenting the evidence to the adjudicating officer in a sealed cover, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Many of the official records that the ED receives are from other countries as India is apart of a global statutory network against money laundering, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
There are provisions for attachment of overseas assets also and in this case also, we have attached properties abroad, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
As on date laundering is going on, laundering is an offence. Money laundering is a stand alone offence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Statute states that there must be a reason to believe based on matetial in possession and such reasons to be recorded by the adjudicating authority in cases of money laundering, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
As a prosecuting agency, we have reached the stage of power to arrest, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The threshold before arresting is much higher as under PMLA than under IPC. Only specified officers can make the arrest after reasons are recorded in writing. All ingredients of Article 20 are covered, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta summarises procedure under PMLA for arrest

-Only the Director authorised can arrest
-based on reasons to believe an offence is committed
-reasons to be recorded in writing
-based on material in possession
-evidence submitted to adjudicating authority in sealed cover
The evidence should be kept with an independent body and the evidence can be supplied to the accused only after chargesheet is filed, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta reading out provisions of the PMLA in relation to the evidence and sealed envelope

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The material in possession is sacrosanct and I cannot use it arbitrarily till chargesheet is filed and cannot serve to the other side till then according to the statue, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
It's not done for "humiliation, humiliation, humiliation" as Mr Singhvi said yesterday but only for prevention, prevention, prevention with capital P, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Overseas banks have given some specific inputs regarding properties, companies etc. We have issued letters rogatory (LR), we have got some, we are awaiting some, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
At this stage if the Court intervenes, it will be preventing us from exercising our statutory right to arrest, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I request the court to grant my material an exclusion from the accused at this stage of investigation. Evidence copy cannot be shared with the accused before filing chargesheet, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta says evidence cannot be shared with accused before filing of chargesheet.

Sibal interjects that he never made the case that accused should be given access to evidence but he should be confronted with it.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Justice Banumathi reminds Mehta that case made on P Chidambaram's behalf was inky that the Court should not be presented with evidence that has not been used to confront the accused.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta: ADM Jabalpur was cited...

Sibal: But, I never made the case that I should be given access to evidence, only said it should be put to me.

Mehta: Dr Singhvi made that argument. This is what happens when two counsel argue for 1 client

Sibal: Both our arguments were same
This is not a witch-hunt as alleged. We have evidence in our possession and it is cogent evidence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I'm going a step further to satisfy the Court's conscience as regards authenticity of the documents, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta hands over a substantially large compilation of case laws to the Court and is reading out precedents to support his argument against disclosure of evidence to the accused ahead of filing of a chargesheet.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I'm going a step further and request the Court to peruse not just the case diary but also material on record, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
SG Tushar Mehta also cites the Supreme Court's judgment in the #BhimaKoregaon case on a petition filed by Romila Thapar and Ors. Mehta points out that in that case too, the case diary was places before the Court.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Bench rises for the day.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to continue his arguments on behalf of the ED tomorrow at 11.30AM

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 5
Bombay High Court to shortly hear HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan's plea seeking quashing of FIR filed by Lilavati Trust.

The FIR filed with the Bandra police pursuant to a magisterial order accuses Jagdishan of accepting It accuses him of accepting a ₹2.05 crore bribe from the erstwhile trustees.

#HDFCBank #SashidharJagdishan #LilavatitrustImage
A bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar is hearing the plea.

In the last hearing, Senior Advocate Amit Desai appearing for Jagdishan argued that the FIR was lodged with malice only to scuttle the recovery proceedings initiated by the bank against business belonging to a late trustee.

Further, he argued that the complainant trust should have followed the appropriate steps and should have filed complaint initially with the local police and then with the superior officer if he failed to take cognisance before approaching the magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS.

He further argued that the complinant was filed by the power of attorney holder of a present trustee Prashant Mehta. The POA holder was appointed long before Mehta even became part of the trust.

He further alleged Mehta of using the trust for his perosonal objectives.
Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda arguing for the trust.

He submits that any irregularity in procedure (Here, the affidavit submitted with the complaint) doesn't mean there is failure of Justice.

He reads out precedents that affirms his stance.

Court: just crystalise your submissions.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court hears a suo motu case involving the death of a 31-year-old resident doctor at the state-run RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal.

Bench: Justice MM Sundresh and NK Singh Image
The case, involving a junior doctor's death at a college seminar hall, has triggered nationwide protests, prompting the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognisance to examine workplace safety for medical professionals and issues in the RG Kar probe.
Justice MM Sundresh: Who is appearing for Union?

Counsel: I appear for Union. As far as intervenor application are concerned, the Registry was sent on email Id...whatever was received on that email I'd, NTF has considered that.....to this effect Union has also filed an affidavit in May 2025.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court hears bail plea by Suryakant Tiwari who is implicated in a case involving an alleged extortion racket related to coal transportation in Chhattisgarh. The accusations involve extorting money from coal transporters, reportedly in connivance with senior bureaucrats, including Saumya Chaurasia, a former Deputy Secretary in the office of the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh.

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya BagchiImage
Sr. Adv. Mukul Rohatgi: the IAS officers who were the main persons behind this have been granted bail. Why should this man be kept in jail.
Sr. Adv. Mahesh Jethmalani: this man is involved in a series of scams. The last one was coal levy. They took 25 rupees per ton on coal transportation.

Court: he has been granted interim bail in the coal scam. Are you seeking cancellation only on the ground that he might threaten the witnesses?
Read 16 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court is hearing petitions challenging a Telangana High Court ruling that relaxed domicile rules for medical college admissions in the state

Bench led by CJI takes up the matter

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi represents the State of Telangana.

CJI: Let’s take a student born and raised in Telangana, but moves away briefly for just Class 10 and 11 perhaps to Kota for coaching. What about them?

Singhvi: The Telugu-speaking global community is enormous among the top 3 outside India. Those individuals would enter through the NRI route. But once a domicile rule is recognised, a threshold is inevitable. We’ve drawn that at four years

#SupremeCourtofIndiaImage
Singhvi: Your Lordships are aware of the Nakara principle any line drawn will have elements of arbitrariness.

CJI: Suppose a Telangana-based IAS officer is posted in Delhi and his child studies there for 2 years. What then?... But in your rule, even if a child leaves Telangana for just 2 years, they are excluded..what about those students who were not aware about anything... Chose to go to other states and they are neither here nor there.

CJI: Take a Telangana-origin judge transferred to Bihar his son would be disqualified through no fault of his..

Singhvi refers to a Government Order based on a Presidential Order to support the State’s stance.
CJI: If parents can afford the children can be sent to London or US

Singhvi: But that does not mean you can reserve something in the state which is actually meant for some people who deserve it.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court resumes hearing plea filed by the management committee of Banke Bihari temple challenging the UP Government’s 2025 ordinance taking control over the temple’s management and seeking recall of the May 15 judgement of the Supreme Court allowing the Government to use temple funds for developing a corridor around the temple.

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya BagchiImage
Yesterday, the Court had proposed the administration of the temple to be taken over by a committee presided by a retired High Court judge and the order of 15 May to be kept in abeyance till the appeal till the constitutionality of the ordinance is decided by the High Court. ASG KM Nataraj had taken time to seek instructions on this proposal.
Today’s hearing begins:

ASG KM Nataraj: let me clarify the ordinance. Ordinance had nothing to do with the writ petition. There was a PIL filed for better administration of the temple.

Court: that may be a good argument but you can take it when we relegate them to the HC to challenge the ordinance.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court hears a bail plea of former bureaucrat Anil Tuteja in a case initiated against him by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) in connection with the Chhattisgarh liquor scam.

Bench: Justice M M Sundresh and Justice NK Singh Image
Senior Advocate, Meenakshi Arora: I have already spend a considerable period of time in incarceration—one and half years.
Advocate Arora argues that bail has been granted to all other accused except the petitioner and Anwar Dhebar.

Advocate Arora: Five raids had been conducted and not a single penny has been recovered.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(