Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 28, 2019 31 tweets 16 min read Read on X
INX Media: Hearing in the Supreme Court on P Chidambaram's petition for anticipatory bail in case registered by the Enforcement Directorate begins.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta begins to make the submission for the agency.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
@dir_ed
@PChidambaram_IN
Every PMLA offence has two dimensions - predicate offence and laundering. Money laundering is a separate offence independent from the predicate/scheduled offence, Mehta.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
We would be dealing with very intelligent people. A stupid man cannot launder money. Money laundering requires layers and layers of concealment, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
These offences leave a money trail which needs to be tracked and the evidence is difficult to collect, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Most of the evidence is in the form of electronic format and within minutes of it being publicised or put before the Court, it will be gone, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
This is why evidence cannot be shared till the prosecution complaint (chargesheet in CrPC parlance) is filed, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Money laundering is independently a criminal offence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The statute stipulates the procedure of presenting the evidence to the adjudicating officer in a sealed cover, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Many of the official records that the ED receives are from other countries as India is apart of a global statutory network against money laundering, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
There are provisions for attachment of overseas assets also and in this case also, we have attached properties abroad, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
As on date laundering is going on, laundering is an offence. Money laundering is a stand alone offence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Statute states that there must be a reason to believe based on matetial in possession and such reasons to be recorded by the adjudicating authority in cases of money laundering, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
As a prosecuting agency, we have reached the stage of power to arrest, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The threshold before arresting is much higher as under PMLA than under IPC. Only specified officers can make the arrest after reasons are recorded in writing. All ingredients of Article 20 are covered, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta summarises procedure under PMLA for arrest

-Only the Director authorised can arrest
-based on reasons to believe an offence is committed
-reasons to be recorded in writing
-based on material in possession
-evidence submitted to adjudicating authority in sealed cover
The evidence should be kept with an independent body and the evidence can be supplied to the accused only after chargesheet is filed, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta reading out provisions of the PMLA in relation to the evidence and sealed envelope

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
The material in possession is sacrosanct and I cannot use it arbitrarily till chargesheet is filed and cannot serve to the other side till then according to the statue, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
It's not done for "humiliation, humiliation, humiliation" as Mr Singhvi said yesterday but only for prevention, prevention, prevention with capital P, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Overseas banks have given some specific inputs regarding properties, companies etc. We have issued letters rogatory (LR), we have got some, we are awaiting some, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
At this stage if the Court intervenes, it will be preventing us from exercising our statutory right to arrest, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I request the court to grant my material an exclusion from the accused at this stage of investigation. Evidence copy cannot be shared with the accused before filing chargesheet, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta says evidence cannot be shared with accused before filing of chargesheet.

Sibal interjects that he never made the case that accused should be given access to evidence but he should be confronted with it.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Justice Banumathi reminds Mehta that case made on P Chidambaram's behalf was inky that the Court should not be presented with evidence that has not been used to confront the accused.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta: ADM Jabalpur was cited...

Sibal: But, I never made the case that I should be given access to evidence, only said it should be put to me.

Mehta: Dr Singhvi made that argument. This is what happens when two counsel argue for 1 client

Sibal: Both our arguments were same
This is not a witch-hunt as alleged. We have evidence in our possession and it is cogent evidence, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I'm going a step further to satisfy the Court's conscience as regards authenticity of the documents, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Mehta hands over a substantially large compilation of case laws to the Court and is reading out precedents to support his argument against disclosure of evidence to the accused ahead of filing of a chargesheet.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
I'm going a step further and request the Court to peruse not just the case diary but also material on record, Mehta

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
SG Tushar Mehta also cites the Supreme Court's judgment in the #BhimaKoregaon case on a petition filed by Romila Thapar and Ors. Mehta points out that in that case too, the case diary was places before the Court.

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram
Bench rises for the day.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to continue his arguments on behalf of the ED tomorrow at 11.30AM

#INXMedia
#PChidambaram

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jul 3
#Breaking

Delhi High Court orders the government's Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC) to take a decision within 15 days on removing a YouTube video by Dhruv Rathee in which he allegedly said that Ram, Seeta and Krishna, consumed meat and alcohol.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma says any disregard of court's order will be taken seriously.

@dhruv_rathee @SachdevaAmitaImage
The Court passed the order after advocate Amita Sachdeva filed a plea in the High Court. Sachdeva took offence to a video uploaded by Rathee on YouTube on March 21, 2026, titled 'Can Hindus Eat BEEF? | Kerala Story 2 EXPOSED'.
Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma appeared for the Central government today and argued that the intermediary (YouTube) should have exercised due diligence, which is to take down the content.

Sharma said that the content uploaded by Rathee is harmful and fissiparous.

"Either Google says they will do it [take down the video] now or my ladyship may pass a judgement based on what the Division Bench has said... He [Google's counsel] should take it down and say he will not permit the such fissiparious content that hurts the sentiments of the majority community," Sharma added.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 3
Supreme Court to hear plea filed by the State of Meghalaya challenging a Meghalaya High Court order that upheld bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, the prime accused in the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their honeymoon in the state #SupremeCourt Image
SG Tushar Mehta: This is shocking. Shocking.
SG: I will just show four pages. Both of them go to Meghalaya for honeymoon. It's a pre determined murder. Wife takes husband to some hilly area.. participates in assault ..he was killed and then dead body was thrown into the gorge. Three assailants brought by the lady and she herself killed him. She was arrested from UP after she absconded. Magistrate says he was satisfied that grounds of arrest was communicated.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 2
Delhi High Court will shortly hear a defamation case filed by journalist Anjana Om Kashyap against Khan Sir and several others for calling her and Aaj Tak “bikau patrakar,” “chatukar,” “dalli,” and accusing them of engaging in “dalaali” and operating a “fake news ki dukaan.”

@anjanaomkashyap #KhanSirImage
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela to hear the matter.
Matter taken up.

Adv Hrishikesh Baruah appears for Kashyap.

Khan sir's lawyer says he has filed vakalatnama.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 22
[Arvind Malhotra vs High court of Himachal Pradesh]

Sr Adv Balbir Singh: My reply on 25.9.2025 was made and the recommendation was made on 23.9.2025. Collegium recommendation says two vacancies were there for promotee judges . 2 juniors were recommeded. I was interacted with on 19.9 and recommendation on 23.9 without having my reply.

Justice BV Nagarathna: These are matters where on judicial side we cannot say disclose this and disclose that. Merely because you are a senior does not mean you will be recommeded. Once collegium discusses, we cannot intervene. There is secrecg involved also... There is no rejection of your candidature. We don't know what does your recommendation say. It is about subjectice satisfaction of HC collegium ..can supreme court on judicial side ask them look into this and look into that. If this happens then where are we heading ?

Justice Joymalya Bagchi: We would have understood if HC collegium went against sc order etc. but this decision of HC has gone further and has been accepted by the supreme court.Image
Justice Nagarathna: We cannot ask the collegium of HC to disclose any reasons etc.

Singh: But after my representation the supreme court had asked the HC to reconsider the petitioner

Justice Nagarathna: How can you say reconsideration is not done?

Justice Bagchi: Screening committee gives it to the recommendation body. Now you cannot challenge screening committee order.

Justice Nagarathna: There is no cause of action. In Karnataka, for 3 vacancies, 9 are called.. 3 are selected. So others cannot adopt this mode and manner..
Justice Nagarathna: There is no procedural flaw in this as of now. Even you don't know if the name is dropped, removed, etc.

Justice Bagchi: Supreme court collegium endorsed and accepted HC recommendation. Now we cannot open this in judicial review.

Justice Nagarathna: If it has been deferred.. there is a chance the name shall be reconsidered..
Read 6 tweets
Jun 19
Supreme Court hears the plea concerning lack of ladies bar rooms across court buildings in India

CJI Surya Kant: I have constituted an All India Judicial Infrastructure committee.

Adv: In Mathura, the ladies bar room is locked. Same situation is in Ghaziabad. 60 percent of courts should have ladies bar room immediately.

CJI: the young lawyer corpus funds is also important.Image
CJI: the issues raised here touch upon larger questions of inclusiveness and long term sustainability of women lawyers in the legal profession. The petitioners have cited lack of ladies bar rooms and other facilities across High court , district court and other court buildings.
CJI: A young advocate corpus fund has been suggested to be formed with the aim that legal profession remains accessible to all. The petitioners have placed on report results of a survey undertaken by them in a structured format. The survey was circulated among women advocates across courts and information was collected from numerous district and taluka courts. The data reveals that in majority of court complexes, either no ladies bar room exists or facilities given is wholly inadequate and other facilities such as washrooms, nursing facilities, creches etc are not available.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 19
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its judgment in a plea filed by Telegram challenging the ban on the platform till June 22 in view of the NEET exams.

Justice Tejas Karia to pass orders at 10:30 AM.

#Telegram @telegram @durov Image
The Court had reserved its verdict yesterday after hearing arguments from Telegram's lawyer, Senior Advocate Dhruv Mehta, and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Central government.

Read the detailed story here:

barandbench.com/news/how-can-w…
Order: After considering all the arguments, we find that given the emergency nature, the reasons supplied are sufficient and government has followed the procedure in Section 69A. The challenge ont eh ground of non supply of reasons can't be held. Both the orders are well founded and supported by reasons. The orders do not suffer from non application of mind. We have also held that under IT Act there is no reason to excluse the platform fromt he admit of "information".
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(