Every PMLA offence has two dimensions - predicate offence and laundering. Money laundering is a separate offence independent from the predicate/scheduled offence, Mehta.
Many of the official records that the ED receives are from other countries as India is apart of a global statutory network against money laundering, Mehta
Statute states that there must be a reason to believe based on matetial in possession and such reasons to be recorded by the adjudicating authority in cases of money laundering, Mehta
The threshold before arresting is much higher as under PMLA than under IPC. Only specified officers can make the arrest after reasons are recorded in writing. All ingredients of Article 20 are covered, Mehta
-Only the Director authorised can arrest
-based on reasons to believe an offence is committed
-reasons to be recorded in writing
-based on material in possession
-evidence submitted to adjudicating authority in sealed cover
The evidence should be kept with an independent body and the evidence can be supplied to the accused only after chargesheet is filed, Mehta
The material in possession is sacrosanct and I cannot use it arbitrarily till chargesheet is filed and cannot serve to the other side till then according to the statue, Mehta
It's not done for "humiliation, humiliation, humiliation" as Mr Singhvi said yesterday but only for prevention, prevention, prevention with capital P, Mehta
Overseas banks have given some specific inputs regarding properties, companies etc. We have issued letters rogatory (LR), we have got some, we are awaiting some, Mehta
I request the court to grant my material an exclusion from the accused at this stage of investigation. Evidence copy cannot be shared with the accused before filing chargesheet, Mehta
Justice Banumathi reminds Mehta that case made on P Chidambaram's behalf was inky that the Court should not be presented with evidence that has not been used to confront the accused.
Mehta hands over a substantially large compilation of case laws to the Court and is reading out precedents to support his argument against disclosure of evidence to the accused ahead of filing of a chargesheet.
SG Tushar Mehta also cites the Supreme Court's judgment in the #BhimaKoregaon case on a petition filed by Romila Thapar and Ors. Mehta points out that in that case too, the case diary was places before the Court.
Supreme Court hears the challenge to the SIR process
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: This is an IA. We have details from 35 to 40 BLOs who have committed suicide. These are all aanganwadi workers , teachers .. Section 32 ROPA notices are being sent to them saying that they will be imprisoned for 2 years if they don't meet deadlines. 50 FIRs have been filed against BLOs in UP. They are taking pride in this.
CJI Surya Kant: See if it is an lawful excercise.. it has to be performed. State can substitute the workers.
#SIR #SupremeCourt
CJI: List 3 employees are provided by the state govt. So ECI has to speak with state government
Sr Adv Maninder Singh: 91 percent process is complete in Tamil Nadu
CJI: are you only on Tamil Nadu..
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: TN is first and also all the states. There was a boy who wanted to attend his wedding.. he was denied and he committed suicide.
CJI: somebody can be unwell.. there can be done other health reasons also...
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: But the electoral officer is their boss and they report to the ECI. States are not on the process.
CJI: state govt deploys these workers. So we can tell the states that wherever workers are facing issues they can be substituted.
Parliament Questions
Sasmit Patra asked about the number of cases filed, disposed and pending before DRTs.
The Government responded that 1,78,172 cases are pending before Debt Recovery Tribunals, along with 66,876 SARFAESI applications, as of 14 November 2025.
Patra asked the Government for forum-wise data on cases filed, disposed and pending before the NCLT, DRTs, SARFAESI recovery forums and erstwhile BIFR.
NCLT:
As of 30 September 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal has:
53,727 total cases filed
Supreme Court to resume hearing today pleas by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and other accused seeking bail in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case.
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and NV Anjaria
#SupremeCourt #UmarKhalid
Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi (for Gulfisha Fatima): I have been in jail for just under 6 years. There is a chargesheet filed on 16.9.2020 but as if it’s a ritual of chargesheets, the supplementary chargesheets are filed continuously… till now we have got 4 supplementary and 1 main. The arrest was in 2020. Even after 2023, the delay is sad, astonishing, and unprecedented.
Singhvi: I seek parity, the high court keeps it pending. Then a new bench takes over. Then the appeals were listed with 8 other Co accused. Then it was released from that bench… whatever reasons, let’s not go into that. Then comes the impugned judgement.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant will deliver the inaugural address at the O.P. Jindal Global University’s international convention on judicial independence today marking the launch of IMAANDAAR (Moot academy) and a discussion on the Kesavananda Bharati verdict with AG R. Venkataramani, SG Tushar Mehta and a host of other Supreme Court judges #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court Justices PS Narasimha, PK Mishra, Aravind Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta at the event #SupremeCourt
Justice Sanjay Karol and Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra arrive #SupremeCourt @Luthra_Sidharth
Supreme Court hears plea concerning OBC reservation for Maharashtra polls
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: We dispute the Banthia commission report because the motive was to reduce the OBC count and only surnames were taken into account.
CJI Surya Kant: We have today a bench mark .. the Banthia commission. We have also not read it but may have to look at critically now
Jaising: The contempt is disguised way to seek review.
CJI: here order is construed or misconstrued is the contention.
CJI: We will hear this matter in 3 judge benches combination by second week of January
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: then let there be no elections till then
Adv Prashant Bhushan: I appear for a disabled professor. This is a very important issue on free speech and how such stakeholders need to be taken into confidence while having consultations
SG Tushar Mehta: Right now we are not dealing with obscenity. But with perversity. Something needs to be done on user generated content. One can have his own @YouTube channel and....we cannot do everything and anything under the garb of free expression
CJI Surya Kant: It is strange that I create my own channel and keep doing things without being accountable. Yes free speech has to be protected ..suppose there is a program with adult content.. there can be warning in advance with parental control.
AG R Venkataramani: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is proposing to have a meeting. They will do everything possible to have a public consultation
CJI: if some provisions need to be incorporated or something needs amendment
SG: yea being considered. I had a word with the minister.
Indian Broadcast and Digital Foundation counsel: Age classification and warnings are in place. There are Digital Media Ethics Code. This code is subjudice.. it was challenged before various HCs and union filed a transfer and it was transferred to Delhi HC and it is to be heard on January 8. This concerns content it Netflix etc. There are 27 petitions. There are Broadcast complaint commission headed by Justice Gita Mittal. Here the category is different. Here comments were made in a user generated content. Ministry has filed a note saying UGC guidelines they are thinking about.
CJI: what is the single instance of penalty or action ? Self styled bodies will not help..some autonomous bodies are free from the influence from those who are exploit all of this and the state also... as a regulatory measure.