Every PMLA offence has two dimensions - predicate offence and laundering. Money laundering is a separate offence independent from the predicate/scheduled offence, Mehta.
Many of the official records that the ED receives are from other countries as India is apart of a global statutory network against money laundering, Mehta
Statute states that there must be a reason to believe based on matetial in possession and such reasons to be recorded by the adjudicating authority in cases of money laundering, Mehta
The threshold before arresting is much higher as under PMLA than under IPC. Only specified officers can make the arrest after reasons are recorded in writing. All ingredients of Article 20 are covered, Mehta
-Only the Director authorised can arrest
-based on reasons to believe an offence is committed
-reasons to be recorded in writing
-based on material in possession
-evidence submitted to adjudicating authority in sealed cover
The evidence should be kept with an independent body and the evidence can be supplied to the accused only after chargesheet is filed, Mehta
The material in possession is sacrosanct and I cannot use it arbitrarily till chargesheet is filed and cannot serve to the other side till then according to the statue, Mehta
It's not done for "humiliation, humiliation, humiliation" as Mr Singhvi said yesterday but only for prevention, prevention, prevention with capital P, Mehta
Overseas banks have given some specific inputs regarding properties, companies etc. We have issued letters rogatory (LR), we have got some, we are awaiting some, Mehta
I request the court to grant my material an exclusion from the accused at this stage of investigation. Evidence copy cannot be shared with the accused before filing chargesheet, Mehta
Justice Banumathi reminds Mehta that case made on P Chidambaram's behalf was inky that the Court should not be presented with evidence that has not been used to confront the accused.
Mehta hands over a substantially large compilation of case laws to the Court and is reading out precedents to support his argument against disclosure of evidence to the accused ahead of filing of a chargesheet.
SG Tushar Mehta also cites the Supreme Court's judgment in the #BhimaKoregaon case on a petition filed by Romila Thapar and Ors. Mehta points out that in that case too, the case diary was places before the Court.
#SupremeCourt hears the fire crackers issue concerning Delhi air pollution
CJI BR Gavai: Whether the pollution in 2018 (AQI) was much less as compared to 2024?
Respondent: If you see CAQM Data..
SG Tushar Mehta: In Covid period it came down ..else it remained the same. There is nothing on record to show that it is because of the firecrackers. I urge that there is no restriction for firecrackers. If there is a two hour timing .... One hour goes in persuading parents only ! We all were children!
Sr Adv K Parameshwar: Half of haryana is under the ban without even being heard. That is how NCR expanse is..
Respondent: Please see the chemical composition..how can we ensure that this 50 percent composition ladden crackers are there in the market?
Sr Adv Parameshwar for the manufacturers: we are saying we will only distribute it to wholesalers from designated 25 to 30 points. And then the check becomes more effective.. our children also staying here.. if it goes bad.. next year also ban can be there
Supreme Court to shortly hear Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam’s plea challenging Madras High Court order directing SIT probe into Karur rally stampede that claimed 41 lives.
Bench: Justices JK Maheshwari and NV Anjaria
#SupremeCourtofIndia #KarurStampede
The plea seeks stay on the Madras High Court order, appointment of a former Supreme Court judge to oversee the probe, and expunging of adverse remarks against the party and its leaders.
#KarurStampede
Sr. Adv. Gopal Subramanium (for TVK): the petition filed before the HC was for a very limited purpose. That the govt should be directed to frame a protocol for road shows. The AAG appears on behalf of the state. In the order various allegations have been made. Adverse inferences are drawn against a person without being a party…. Please see the various averments…
Sabarimala gold loss case: Kerala High Court suo motu impleads State Police Chief in case concerning loss of gold from the gold plated covering the dwarapalaka idols at Sabarimala temple.
Bench of Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V and KV Jayakumar made it clear today that the SIT is to refrain from speaking to the media until the probe is completed. SIT to file reports every two weeks before the Court in sealed cover.
HC orders State Police Chief to direct ADGP Venkatesh, who is also the SIT head, to register a crime and carry out the investigation in accordance with law.
Supreme Court hears applications seeking review of its Vanashakti judgement.
In the judgement, the Court had barred the Central government from granting retrospective environmental clearance.
Bench: CJI BR Gavai, Justices K Vinod Chandran and Ujjal Bhuyan
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal: the OM refers to 2 powers. It was passed in pursuance of the order of the NGT. There is apparently an error.
Sibal: all disputes with respect to violations can be dealt by the tribunal. None of this was pointed out to the bench.
CJI: it appears from the NGT order that despite violation the violators continued with impunity. That’s why these directions were there.
Sibal: they said it projects are permissible then only it will be done. If they are impermissible there will be demolition. many of these projects were permissible ones. Like the airport. Central government passed the OM in pursuance to the NGT order.
Supreme Court hears plea seeking probe into alleged financial irregularities and fund diversion by Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd and its promoters.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and NK Singh
#SupremeCourt #Indiabulls
Adv Prashant Bhushan (appearing in person)
Sr. Adv. Harish Salve (for Sameer Gehlaut, founder and chairman of India Bulls): this is such blackmail litigation. If an investigation is needed it is into these NGOs. All the agencies have filed affidavits and nothing has come out. What is this kind of witch hunting. Who is this stranger. I am objecting the maintainability of this petition.
Justice Kant: CBI says ED may continue investigation into IHFL’s affairs. We want to know what is the ED’s stand on it. We will hear you on maintaining Mr. Salve. Don’t worry.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls, which was conducted ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections #BiharSIR #SupremeCourt
Bench to assemble shortly. Hearing will start at 2pm.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: after the final roll has come out we have been able to do some analysis. We have been able to access the 2003 guidelines for SIR. And another 2016 guideline where they said how to remove bogus voters etc. we have prepared written submissions.