School boards in ON are bound by s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms ("Charter") & by s. 1 of the Ontario Human Rights Code ("Code"). There are differences in wording comparing the Charter & the Code. For example, the Charter only says "sex" while the Code ... /1
includes the following in addition to sex: sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status & family status. Let me explain the difference as I would when teaching high school law & history which I've taught. Sex in the Charter includes the terms ... /2
... in the Code. The Code is passed by a majority vote of the Ontario Legislature. Accordingly, it has been changed over time to include these additional terms. For example, gender identity & gender expression were added in 2012. The wording in the Charter, however, is ... /3
... too difficult for the Canadian Parliament to change. The Charter itself barely made it through significant legal hurdles to become Canada's ultimate law in 1982. The Charter's amending formula (s. 38) requires the approval of two-thirds of the provincial legislatures ... /4
... representing at least 50% of Canada's population. There are other political reasons why constitutional changes are avoided in Canada. Nevertheless, Canadian courts have interpreted "sex" in the Charter to essentially include those additional terms in the Code. /5
As an employee of a school board in ON, I am bound by the Charter & the Code in how I teach students & relate to their families. Therefore, I must treat them equally regardless of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, & family status.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're an ON Catholic principal asked from above to put up a very white image of Jesus in your school foyer in relation to Sacred Heart of Jesus celebrations this June, when you already have a very white queen & pope there, here are some suggested responses:
1/5
1. Don't display it. This white Jesus (when there are so many other ways to display Jesus since there is no actual accurate portrait of the historical Jesus) likely works against almost everything you've worked for in your school in the area of equity.
2/5
2. If you're required to display a Jesus, display an equity-focused Jesus (eg. a rainbow-coloured Jesus or a Black Jesus). This is the Sacred Heart of Jesus image I displayed in my classroom in June, for example.
STATEMENT: Starting in the 2021-22 school year, I will no longer as a Catholic teacher teach fully Theme 3 of the Fully Alive program in a Gr. 1-8 classroom.
WHY: Theme 3 (the curriculum & Fully Alive resources) is anti-2SLGBTQ+ & therefore harmful & disrciminatory.
1/7
Theme 3 of the Fully Alive program, progressively from Gr. 1 to 8, teaches that non-heterosexual students are inferior in God's plan to heterosexual students & that transgender students (if they identify with a gender other than their gender at birth) are not whole persons.
2/7
More specifically, the Fully Alive program teaches that marriage in God's plan can only be between a male & a female, that heterosexual students may marry one day while non-heterosexual students must remain single & can never marry in order to live according to God's plan.