Poor conVics are gonna take across-the-board Ls on everything 🙃
ConVics know the loss is coming so they're more mad than usual
You definitely should *not* report their videos 🙃
Looks an awful lot like #LOLcrimes to me... 🧐
Now I can't find it amid the 💩
Anyone seen that tweet & able to send it to me so we can formally add it to The Threadnought?
Try again. Do better.
I bet Defendants are gonna put him on the stand to ask about where he was and his signature... 🤣🤣🤣
A link to any tweet will do
I couldn't possibly list all the key players because it would mean leaving other key players out inadvertently
Calling someone a pedophile in the context of Twitter is not an objective statement of verifiable fact; it's an insult, "rhetorical hyperbole," that is not actionable
See, e.g., Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (1974)
2️⃣ R.Broly won't have the money to sue me either after he gets hit with this award for attorney fees and sanctions
3️⃣ You're broke
But you said "convicted." Where did I ever say he was "convicted"?
Privilege doesn't attach to crimes / frauds. And even if it did, "I'm gonna forge your name then notarize it" isn't legal advice
That's why Percy doesn't want R.Broly at the hearing. It'd either mean one commits perjury or the other gets outed for #LOLcrimes
These are not, however, smart people
Think about it: pre-motion, Percy could have no-showed at the hearing and let the new guy argue it, attacking Lemoine for making baseless accusations he can't prove
Now? Lemoine's response can just be "where's Vic?" 🤣🤣
...on Friday the 13th 😱😱😱
Speculation is that attorney @LawoftheGame may be in the room to offer his thoughts in real-time
Y'all are amazing 🥰 I can't explain how cool it is having decentralized crowd-sourced resources like this
Highlight it for us
Where's the "convicted" tho?
1️⃣ What does it mean for a thing to be "documented"?
2️⃣ How about when it's then "well-" documented?
3️⃣ Now what does it mean for a person to be "convicted"?
4️⃣ Are the answers in 2️⃣ and 3️⃣ the same? If so, why?
I can't wait for this to be over so I can block them all and go back to dealing with MAGAts and bootlickers 😂
➡️ 55% chance a 2nd hearing is scheduled or the current one is continued
➡️ 40% chance it's a "normal" hearing and Judge just takes the case under advisement to issue a ruling within 30 days
➡️ 5% chance he's so pissed he rules from the bench
➡️ Best case: TCPAs granted across the board, everything dismissed
➡️ Worst case: TCPAs denied across the board, everything stays in play
➡️ Best case: TCPAs denied across the board, everything stays in play
➡️ Worst case: TCPAs granted on everything *except* for 1-2 ultimately non-winnable claims (e.g. the assault on Rial)
If any issues remain, P's appeal has to wait
In terms of strength of case, Marchi's is totally guaranteed, Funi's is totally guaranteed, Toye's is almost-totally guaranteed. Rial's – except for the hotel story – is almost-totally guaranteed.
That's a worst case scenario for Vic, but a less-than-best case scenario for Rial, so the conVics will claim the win
We'll see what happens tomorrow 🙃
Plus a new Twitter banner in the AM!
1️⃣ R.Broly is a public figure, so there's an argument to be made that Van Der Linden doesn't apply at all. Even if it did, there's a separate argument that it doesn't cover actual malice, only falsity
So R.Broly's evidence is now self-contradictory and no longer "clear and specific"
Competent counsel could navigate this past TCPA no question. Percy gets 10% odds.
You're terrible at this
I already announced a week or so ago that I'm blocking all of you after the judge makes his decision though 😘
The Streisand-Mignogna Effect will do that.
It would be very, very sad if he just rehashed the Motion to Quash that @questauthority covered hours ago
You're terrible at this 🤣🤣🤣
I accidentally branched the thread when I returned after the lockout, so everything after the viral #FuniLeaks tweet to the branch is hidden from the algo 😭
Here's a fun little thread of Screech quotes from his livescreeches 🙃
The defamation case against Musk is based on a separate, very detailed email he sent to BuzzFeed. Screenshot is here:
You're terrible at this
Republicans were corrupt, and the incumbent was useless with some truly questionable votes (e.g. making police bodycam video secret, wasting money to drug test all welfare recipients, etc)
I am just shocked (shocked!) to find that gambling is going on in here!
"You have free reign to say whatever you want about Vic Mignogna, have it seen by tens of thousands of people, and he can't do anything about it because you're a poor!" is not the jab you think it is 🤣
...but he'll hide it under a button-up because he's also a coward
I predicted less than 20 ppl outside of the parties / attorneys / court personnel
Maybe he's just hungover from last night's livescreech
All that GoFundMe money, lit on fire... 🤣🤣🤣
Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
My guess is judge considers them anyway to be fair, but it won't affect the outcome
Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
Like being drawn and quartered. But slowly.
Because Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
And LawTwitter was 100% right from the beginning about her
All that's left for her is figuring out how much $$$$$$$$$ on attorney fees and sanctions that Vic Mignogna will owe
Vic is losing
Because he's a well-documented sexual predator and pedophile
Means Percy is required to affirmatively prove that Defendants knew their statements were false when they were made, or strongly suspected they were false but made them anyway
Did Ty Beard really try to argue a metaphor is defamatory?????
Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
A competent lawyer would have *started* with the hotel room tweet
Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
No matter how dumb I've thought Ty Beard (@TyBeard10) was at any point before today – he's proven to me that I *vastly* overestimated him
"Call me and I'll explain it to you" headass
The stay only applies to getting discovery from *the other side*! 🤣🤣🤣
Ty Beard doesn't 👏 know 👏 what 👏 he's 👏 doing 👏
Today's sh*tshow is basically Nick's fault 🙃
But I also didn't expect Ty Beard to totally sh*t the bed this badly
➡️ allllll of Jamie's fees
➡️ allllll of Jamie's costs
➡️ the % of Monica's fees on TI
➡️ the % of Monica's costs on TI
➡️ the % of Ron's fees on TI
➡️ the % of Ron's costs on TI
➡️ the % of Funi's fees on TI
➡️ the % of Funi's costs on TI
He may of course rule earlier too
Keep that in mind. There is a 0% chance he gets overturned on appeal because of anything that happened in there today. None.
@ me if you're on there by mistake
You probably should be, given how much you've misled Vic Mignogna's fans these past few months
How's your mailbox? 🙃
Meanwhile, Vic Mignogna made something like -$250,000ish 🙃
And I don't have thousands of teenagers to grift allowance money from like Screech 😢
No. Next set of talking points will be how unfair the judge was and how they'll definitely win on appeal
Just a long series of embarrassing courtroom blowouts
Because Vic Mignogna is a well-documented sexual predator and pedophile who will now owe $$$$$$$$$ to the victims he sued 🙃
Let me say it backwards: WWWOOOOOWWW
This column in the Dallas Morning News is ::chef's kiss::
Sanctions hearing will happen regardless, & likely rolled into the appeal
This issue may come up again during the sanctions hearing 🙃
My understanding is Mignogna can post a bond to forestall execution until his appeals are done, but after that...
2️⃣ Send disbarment requests to:
The North Carolina State Bar
ATTN: Grievance Division
217 E Edenton Street
Raleigh NC 27601
It was a test by Lemoine to see how Percy would respond: "hey this was served late!" or "hey you can't ask him about my crimes!"
Percy failed 🙃
(I love all the Percy quotes btw)
I'm gonna miss most of what y'all have sent me, but I'll see what I can do tomorrow
But most conVics in my @'s have proven immune to education
This was one of the most-widely shared tweets on the whole hashtag 🤣
Toye had an independent legal right to negotiate of the terms of his potential con sponsorship so those statements are qualifiedly privileged under TX law and can't be TI
Percy was required to produce "clear and specific evidence." He couldn't. Because he's incompetent.
Reminder again: if you're blocked at @fsckemall, you're gonna be blocked here too after Judge Chupp makes his final ruling
DM me if you think I've blocked you by mistake
Night all 👊
The 9-day tangent thread starts here:
Y'all remember @ottovonbisbark's livetweets, and conVics going "I don't believe those, they're BIASED"?
It was worse. Waaaayy worse.
It's a common misinterpretation that the conVics are running wild with
Let's do some fan mail
@metholomew211 decided to let me know he had an alt account he was using to evade his account suspension
Vic Mignogna is the R. Kelly of Anime, just less talented. Hence R. Broly.
Shouldn't you be posting from the sockpuppet account you just created?
The good folks at @CBR had a surprisingly thorough write-up on just how disastrous this entire LOLsuit has been for R.Broly
We did a whole fundraiser for the Boys & Girls Club *without this account* and still raised more than last year!
(Special thanks to @Popehat for several RTs!)
Because f*ckin' YIKES it's even worse than I tweeted back on 9/6! 😱
I think Vic Mignogna has a better malpractice case against Ty Beard now than he did before September 6th. But he needs someone who will tell him the truth
If you get snagged inadvertently, have someone who isn't blocked @ or DM me
He'd still lose at summary judgment even with a good lawyer
But unfortunately Vic Mignogna won't have any money for more LOLsuits after the sanctions hearing in this one 🙃
Follower count has dropped by 150 🤣
My theory is that if you follow garbage, you're probably garbage
Confirming my theory a few weeks back that the "mass unfollows" they were so feverishly tracking were, in fact, themselves
I'm fine with that tbqh 🤣
We'll see if R.Broly is smart enough to demand an accounting once he realizes how much he's going to owe in attorney fees and sanctions
Ty Beard did so bad at the TCPA hearing that I'd be begging for a settlement if I were in his shoes
Dude's definitely a b*tch
If the money's going straight into his operating account though, I could see an argument. It'd mean more fraud though
I've been off doing lawyer work and I'm so far behind 😩
Let me say it backwards: wwwooowww
Judge Chupp is providing an off-ramp if Vic wants it
So him and Screech will almost certainly see this as a win
Which also happens to be his TCPA order deadline
Judge Jolly did it often with needlessly complex cases in the NC Business Court
Versus a court ruling that just says "your case is thrown out and you owe them $$$$"
Rather than do it himself, he's giving Vic Mignogna a chance to self-nuke in the hope there's less fallout
Don't hold your breath though
Judge orders everyone to mediation, and your first move is a callback to your "don't spike the football" tweet after sh*tting the bed? 🤣
Dude's dumber than a bucketful of bent nails
So the "Marchi isn't dismissed" takes from your favorite Minnesota journLOList are even dumber than normal
General rule is that any disability suffered by the prevailing party ends on the date of the oral order, but the deadline for the losing party to appeal is based on the date of the written order memorializing it
I get the impression Percy has not been straightforward with his client
With the obligatory caveat that different states may handle stuff differently, I'm not a Texas attorney (yet), etc etc
It's live, you can donate here to crowdfund the transcript of today's hearing (excess $$$ to RAINN again):
Given the nature of the harassment the past however many months, though, I'd imagine there's a strong incentive for any final settlement to be public
He's offering Vic an off-ramp
Every. single. one. of those 12 dismissed claims is entitled to payment of atty fees + sanctions
But they're morons, so they're taking is as the judge changing his mind two weeks later as a result of being threatened by weebs
They can do a livescreech where they dunk on LawTwitter and go "See! We were right all along! Donate now!"
Bonus: mediator can be compelled to testify in a later malpractice case. Alford v Bryant, 137 SW3d 916 (Tex App Dallas 2004)
Anything better than that is a "win"
Anything that or better is a win
The only term I could see being a sticking point is confidentiality, because the conVic media will paint it as a total win
I had a mediation from 9a-12:15a a few weeks back – 15.25 hours in the room. Mediators' powers have limits
Every single potential future Defendant has watched this recursive dumpster fire and is damn near giddy and the thought of being sued themselves
Hell I've all but begged Percy to sue me, I could use the $$$ 🤣
You use law / facts / etc in the hopes it helps the mediator convince the other side that you're right, but it's not like a jury trial where there's a certain quantum of evidence you have to meet
There's no chance Percy has been honest with Vic about how badly he sh*t the bed at the TCPA hearing
They're absolutely going to win, but an appeal will likely take 1-2 years. So they'd be settling in exchange for something – idk what it would be – that would put an end to all this
➡️ Right on public figure:
➡️ Right on missing contracts:
➡️ Right on Funi's win and on an amended petition being denied:
➡️ Right on TI against Toye getting dismissed:
➡️ Right on the claims against Funi and Marchi getting dismissed:
This is just from skimming 😂
Spoiler: the Threadnought lawyers have been right from the very beginning
The LOLyers have not
I blocked 60k of them last night though so the @'s are mostly from genuinely inquisitive ppl now
Chupp just gave me a 30-day head start of "70.6% right already"
But not before you're blökt
And that's after I already knew he was a f*ckin' moron 😱
Several of the other tweets and Facebook posts are already in this thread
Yesterday the man in the black robe gave everyone pieces of paper. Those pieces of paper were given to me. I used a scanner to make those pieces of paper into a PDF, that I then put on Dropbox.
It's an archive of pieces of paper
He's a typical conVic sealion.
Your words: "Why make a Dropbox posting one person when there is a compilation?"
A compilation wasn't handed out in court. Just pieces of paper. That I scanned and shared, so people knew what was handed out in court
(And 3x more followers than Vic Mignogna too! How do you say "Barbara Streisand" in Korean? 🤣)
They could resolve everything, resolve nothing, or resolve something in between
Still waiting on response from the court reporter re the hearing yesterday
I mean detectives, sorry!
Folks who litigate often can read this for what it is though: the judge is going to dismiss the entire case, and is giving the Plaintiff a chance to save face
But otherwise accurate. Happy to unblock the non-CHUDs
It definitely confirms Vic Mignogna's claims against @marchimark are still totally dismissed btw
I told y'all that's how this works! 😂
First, revisit our analysis of the best and worst outcomes for each party at the TCPA hearing
Judge Chupp gives away the game: his ruling *can't* be overturned on appeal "in three months" unless he dismisses every. single. claim. On October 7
His war against the Defendants is lost, and if he doesn't capitulate at mediation the judge will do it for him no later than October 7th.
Read the Horton v Martin opinion I linked a few tweets up. Ds get interlocutory appeals immediately based on TCPA's text; P can only appeal a final judgment
No chance at this point. He's certainly read the law before the TCPA hearing
Any ancillary disciplinary proceedings can't change the sh*t sandwich of a record Percy has helped produce
In other mediations, it's not uncommon to allow parties to attend remotely or not at all (esp in business litigation)
Will post the invoice with the check and RAINN receipt when the $$ comes in (it's still in GFM's possession)
The only one w/ a viable claim against him is Vic, but Screech will keep fellating him so he never notices
If he goes MIA for an extended period, Vic might realize the jig is up
If the claim is assignable, then yes that could be part of a hypothetical mediation settlement
But he's not entirely wrong, no. Talked w/ @TXantislapplaw about $1 appeal bond back in July. More later, doing real lawyer work atm
Dovetails nicely with TCPA §27.011(b)
Fort Worth is in an entirely different appellate district though, so it's entirely nonbinding.
He didn't want to talk about the TCPA hearing b/c Percy sh*t the bed, so he pretended the transcript didn't exist until the mediation hearing
He then used that to pretend the judge changed his mind. Until that transcript
So regardless of the bond amount, Vic ends up on the hook for trial fees and costs, appellate fees and costs, and interest
But to just do a 180° reversal with no new evidence? Very rare
I keep telling you I didn't want to assume the worst about Percy!
The horrors! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Percy must be holding back on the trust fund disbursement this month if Screech is this desperate 🤔
Screech is just trying to muddy Funi's reputation in the hope it will force them to settle
Because, you know, this is a SLAPP suit
These prank calls have gotten so old Vic Mignogna won't even proposition them 😢
They don't learn
Let me fix that for you though 😘
I do appreciate him letting me know that the @fsckemall conVic blocklist missed him though. Now it'll automatically propagate to all the subscribers too 🙃
"Impact litigation" is a real thing; you go in expecting to lose at the trial level so you can generate favorable case law at the appellate level
But a LOLsuit for libelslander isn't that
I've been sorely inclined to just upload that YT vid of Darren Sharper going "hold my diiiiick"
Idk whytf the Kiwis and conVics are gloating
Thankfully, the Defendants and their respective attorneys know better
Presumably it will pick up again when the mediation happens
This only ends at mediation if the Defendants want it to end
I didn't even know who Percy was! Just that he was a moron (which turned out to be a huge understatement)
When I see those letters I reflexively think of a Masters in Business Administration degree
Appeals are based on "the record," which are the filed documents at the trial level plus the hearing transcripts
The Court has to summarize that
Three months later otoh...
I'm content continuing to have no clue who he is
None of them say "pedo," but Vic's 30-year career as a sexual predator won't be able to be avoided
R.Broly changing counsel would mean he loses access to his fundraising operation
She laughed. He turned purple. It was fun
How do you say "Barbara Streisand" in Latin? 🤔
I'm not the defense's lawyer, nor an opposing lawyer
As in, the people Vic Mignogna sued
As in, not the guy who did a spontaneous demo in his deposition of how he assaulted one of them
Twitter automatically puts them alllllllll the way at the bottom since they're such low quality 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
"Preponderance" is the baseline for most torts. "Clear and convincing" is common for licensure disputes and certain types of civil commitments. "Clear, cogent, and convincing" too
➡️ "Reasonable suspicion": used for traffic stops; fuzzy area around the 25-30 yard lines
➡️ "Probable cause": used for arrest and search warrants; fuzzy area around the 40-50 yard lines
➡️ "Clear and convincing evidence": used for many regulatory / licensure-related cases and a mishmash of other things; basically just into the Red Zone
First they get a fresh license from Toei, now they're running a joint venture. They're gonna beg for a settlement any minute now!
Likely wasn't renewed initially b/c Screech didn't notice it lapsed
There is no scenario at this point where Vic gets a trial, thanks to Percy
Even after blocking nearly all of them, they keep creating new sockpuppets to keep The Threadnought going
I'd recommend Adi v Prudential out of First COA and its citations re use of truth on a Rule 166 motion. Same with SCOTX last para of WFAA v McLemore re actual malice
"Undue hardship" is a bankruptcy law standard
The key point of the defamation piece of Van Der Linden v Khan, for example, is that if there's a "he said / she said" situation, a mere denial is adequate to beat TCPA
None of which matters to LPPF Mignogna of course
I said in a scenario where there's no outside witnesses or other evidence (like Khan, & Vic/Rial hotel story), a mere denial is sufficient for TCPA but not MSJ
➡️ Transcript: drive.google.com/open?id=12hFOj…
➡️ Invoice from CSR
➡️ GFM screen of funds raised
➡️ Cashier's check
That left $509.12, which went to:
➡️ RAINN donation (rounded up to $510)
But still helping a good cause either way! ☺️
It's kind of stressful b/c there's inevitably going to come a day where we can't beat the prior year's numbers 😆😩
@secos does the tweet counter still work?
Like, I'm doing my daily cardio workout rn of course I'm not doing client sh*t at 11p 😂
One of the lawyers in my building was a prosecutor in NYC, and she was talking about overnight court shifts 😱
But, alas, they're going to lose on everything so there will never be a trial
Asking for a friend... 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Imagine R. Kelly, but in anime. And with much less artistic talent.
Zero chance Defendants pay Plaintiff anything IMO
2+ more years of The Threadnought!
The sanctions hearing is gonna be 🔥🔥🔥
It's all going to get dismissed, and the appeal will flop hilariously
Maybe he needs a CPAP machine to sleep better... 🤔
As you move up the appellate ladder, you have a ratio of cases:judges that gets increasingly lopsided and takes longer as a result
2 hearing transcripts?
I wonder what finally triggered it
He's exceptionally talented at f*cking up LOLsuits for libelslander
Anything they file in the future will end up with the exact same result, and any future Defendants have a repository of pleadings they can incorporate by reference in their defenses
Also, can you imagine how pathetic it is that Screech and Percy mapped out that back-and-forth ahead of time? 🤣🤣🤣
The question is whether Vic has any actual friends who care about him enough to tell him that
Women claimed Vic assaulted them. Vic claimed they were lying. The Judge just concluded they weren't.
The earlier one was his "doing business as" registration for the Rekieta Law tradename
This is license to practice law and hold himself out as an attorney
Here's that order btw:
There are a number of things that aren't First Amendment-protected speech but also aren't criminal (porn, for example)
And why Vic will owe the Defendants $$$$$$$$$ 🙃
Generally, you can't raise an issue for the first time on appeal; for the appeals court to consider it, it has to be "preserved" at the trial level
1️⃣ Percy argues the Court erred by refusing to consider the unsworn declarations
2️⃣ The Defendants' rebuttal will be that the unsworn declarations were filed within 7 days of trial without even attempting to get leave of court first, so it violated the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
3️⃣ Percy responds that the declarations didn't violate the Rules, because there wasn't anything new in them vs the fraudulent affidavits
My guess is he will handle the appeal, and tailor his arguments, in a way that minimizes his malpractice liability instead of what gives Vic the best chance to win
Appeals after that are conditional: some states allow automatic appeals if a judge dissents, or if it's a death penalty criminal case, but generally you have to ask the next court
[Unless, of course, Screech is one of Vic's LOLyers too (which we already knew tbh)]
Maybe a less-incompetent lawyer would fare better in Round 2 though 😂
And funny af at points tbh: "Why would you keep giving money to a man with 17 straight losses??" 🤣
Some permit a 2nd appeal "en banc," where all the judges weigh in. Then there's a state supreme court
This is from a month ago:
➡️ Dismissing with prejudice is not an "extreme measure"; it means the lawsuit can't be refiled, and is both common and normal
➡️ "Chupp's ruling is b/c he got a blowjob from @marchimark" sure sounds defamatory... 🤔
Even Ty Beard himself withdrew the affidavit containing them, that's how false they were 🙃
My tweet was from June 6th btw, for all you "LaWtWiTtEr GoT nOtHiNg RiGhT" conVics 😘
But here's all impressions for all tweets on both accounts since 6/6
Vic Mignogna is going to lose any appeal, because Ty Beard is incompetent 🙃
They'll have different standards of review though. The TCPA conclusions will be reviewed "de novo" (no deference to Chupp) but sanctions are "abuse of discretion"
Second is almost right but not quite: it's not that Vic has been recognized as a public safety threat, but instead that people talking about Vic's perving is the type of public safety-related speech protected by the TCPA
But paring the list back to the 2-3 most egregious tweets and you could get it done
So it's hearsay coupled with conVics making assumptions
Kinda weird that you pick now to tout how much you support a sexual predator and pedophile though. But do you.
You'll notice most of the extra research done was on excluding the 2nd Amended Petition, which will be reviewed on an abuse of discretion standard
They're quick to use my content for their own though 🤣
They apparently have no practical experience with any state-level litigation at all
I think Ty Beard's legal services – such as they are – would qualify as imputed income for Vic
That number comes out to... 0
I joined Twitter on 11 April 2010, which is 3466 days ago (4,991,040 minutes)
I've tweeted 164,900 times (rounding up)
164,900 tweets ➗
0.03 tweets per minute
Y'all send thoughts and prayers to the person running this account if they keep skimming the thread 🤣
Will be interesting to see if there's a signed privilege waiver on file dated in May
MinnRPC 1.6(a): "a lawyer shall not knowingly reveal information relating to the representation of a client"
Vic Mignogna has already lost at the trial level. He's going to lose again on appeal. Enjoy living in denial until the opinion drops 🙃
Defendants' attorneys have 30 days from last Friday to file their motions, Judge Chupp schedules it whenever he sees fit, then appeal timer starts when his ruling at that hearing is put into writing and signed