Scientific racism, a thread: In March, a journal published a paper defending the “theory” that Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychology, multiculturalism, Marxism and left-wing political movements in general are best understood in terms of “Jewish group evolutionary strategy.”
These “Jewish ideologies,” we are told, promote Jewish group interests by weakening the white populations sense of nationalism, religiosity and ethnocentrism. 2/100
It is also claimed that this group evolutionary strategy also manifests itself in the over-representation of Jews in the leadership of cultural, academic and political fields that have been tainted by cultural Marxism. 3/100
This “theory” is, obviously, the nothing more than the delusions of a neo-Nazi crank.
Originating with open White Nationalist Kevin MacDonald, it’s basically every anti-Semitic conspiracy theory you’ve ever heard dressed up in pseudo-Darwinian clothes. 4/100
But this wasn’t published in some fringe journal. It was published in Evolutionary Psychological Science a Springer Nature journal with leaders in the field like David Buss and Steven Pinker sitting on it’s editorial board. 5/100
If this surprises you, it probably shouldn’t. Semi-mainstream scientific journals a littered with bogus race science just like this. 6/100
Hell, this paper itself was part of an exchange with a rival scholar who claimed that Jewish over-representation in the leadership of these movements can be best explained in terms of racial differences in innate intelligence. 7/100
So how did we get to this point where mainstream scientific journals are hosting a debate on the finer details of the Jewish Question?
In this thread, we’ll see how this is the result of a concerted effort at entryism into academia by a network of far-right activists. 8/100
This is the story of how Nazi money continued to corrupt the sciences long after the Second World War by funding fringe scholars and selectively funding semi-mainstream research. 9/100
It is the story of how former members and active supporters of the NSDAP, along with their ideological successors, infiltrated academia and set up fake scientific institutions to advance their racist ideology; institutions which still exist to this day. 10/100
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Cass commissioned a series of systematic reviews from the University of York, two of these looked at the outcomes of treatment with puberty blockers and with cross sex hormones. We’ll focus on the latter for our example. adc.bmj.com/content/early/…
The reviews sifted through the available studies and used a variation on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to grade each study as high, moderate or low certainty (the word used by the authors is “quality”).
🧵 Hilary Cass misrepresents this big scary graph in her final report. It’s not from a study of people who detransition, it’s from an ethnographic study of the online detrans community (a socio-political subculture).
Respondents who had medically and/or socially detransitioned were excluded if they continued to identify as transgender or didn’t embrace a “detrans” identity. The majority of people who detransition were never eligible to participate. doi.org/10.1080/009183…
Curiously, respondents were included in the study even if they had never taken any steps to socially or medically transition. This is a study of detrans as an identity within online spaces. Not of people who detransition.