People with corrupt motives are sometimes called "black hats."
People who are compromised but who are helping the cause of good are sometimes called "grey hats."
There is a degree of risk in assigning a "white hat" or "black hat" label to someone before all the facts are known about their motives and behaviors.
The upside is that you may be proven right.
And temptation is feeling entitled to tell the world just how right you've been all along.
Allow me to explain.
The effect confirmation bias has on our ability to logically and rationally evaluate data is greater than we know.
Much of what comes from mainstream sources is primarily disinformation.
The media simply doesn't admit that.
But being forewarned is forearmed.
When you study game theory, you begin to understand the strategy behind disinformation.
That makes it easier to determine what is disinformation and what isn't.
But a wise person is able to discern truth from error, dark from light.
They're able to evaluate data and make proper determinations about it.
If this were a baseball game, the OIG report on the Clinton email investigation would be the first inning.
The McCabe report was the 2nd inning.
The Comey report was the 3rd inning.
The FISA report is the 4th inning.
They're internal affairs reports on whether employees violated policy and procedure.
Criminal referrals may or may not come from the next OIG report but it doesn't matter.
AG Barr may be doing his own investigation. We'll need a 7th inning stretch after hearing from him.
Until the sealed indictments are unsealed, there's no way of knowing who is going down or for what.
It's a marathon, not a sprint.
Pray for justice.