1. Again, drop issue of impeachment. @SpeakerPelosi is right that, for now, votes aren't there.
But @TheDemocrats have no excuse for their complicity in aiding Trump Admini in rank violations of the law. Their weak, impotent "stern letter" approach is undermining democracy...
@SpeakerPelosi@TheDemocrats 2...this began when @TheDemocrats all but announced that they were too scared to use their authority in the face of unquestionable lawbreaking by Administration officials. Who is at fault? It begins with...
@SpeakerPelosi@TheDemocrats@RepRichardNeal@stevenmnuchin1 4...the SOLE power that Mnuchin and Rettig had was to invoke - on behalf of Trump - that the tax returns be reviewed in closed session. But they were, without doubt, obligated to turn it over.
They refused, invoking a made-up standard of "legislative purpose."....
ANYONE in the @HouseDemocrats should have known that the ONLY way this would not escalate into an all-out refusal of oversight was to invoke inherent contempt. In other words....
@SpeakerPelosi@TheDemocrats@RepRichardNeal@stevenmnuchin1@HouseDemocrats 6...@RepRichardNeal should have introduced a motion declaring Mnuchin and Rettig in violation of the law for failure to follow the obligations of 26 U.S. Code § 6103, and for refusing to abide by a subpoena. Then, if it passed, the men would be arrested and tried in the House...
@SpeakerPelosi@TheDemocrats@RepRichardNeal@stevenmnuchin1@HouseDemocrats 8...because it signaled to the Trump White House that the @HouseDemocrats were so weak, so flabby, so intellectually empty, that they were unwilling even to defend the legislative branch as a co-equal branch of government. Instead, they went running to 3d branch - the courts..
In other words, they proved beyond doubt that they would do NOTHING in response to legal violations. And the floodgates opened..
@SpeakerPelosi@TheDemocrats@RepRichardNeal@stevenmnuchin1@HouseDemocrats 10...now, when Congress demands a Trump cabinet officer testify, they just say "F-you!" and there is no testimony. When they send a subpoena, they say "D-you!" and there is no testimony. When there IS testimony, they make up nonexistent rights - general privilege...
Worse, the inspector general of intelligence community has found this matter is "urgent." Do you know what "urgent" means, @RepAdamSchiff and @SpeakerPelosi? It doesnt....
The reality of health care worker's life, in the age of COVID, and why "get back to work in 5 days, HCW's, or be fired!" requirements is fomenting talk of mass resignations: "I am at a loss for words. I don’t even have the energy to express to my family and friends how shit../1
"...my days are. It’s sucking the life out of me. I can’t laugh. I can’t smile properly. There are just no words.
I think maybe this is the collapse of the healthcare system in my area. The short staffing isn’t just the nurses, the doctors are so short too"..../2
..."We cant care about things until they are an emergency because there is always an emergency now. We are running from fire to fire watching little flames pop up in this room and that room, but can’t even respond because over here there is a blaze. I am not trained for the".../3
Unlike Fox and MAGA, I criticize when people I support screw up. The CDC has screwed up with it's 10 day/5 day recommendation. At for-profit hospitals around the country, this has become a requirement - not a recommendation - for nursing staffs, including the Covid+ and even.../1
...the symptomatic when staff is short - which it is everywhere now. Hospitals have been depending on travel nurses at triple wage to fill in gaps; this will save money short-term, while increasing risk to staff and patients. If we get through the wave, the need for travel.../2
...nurses will be less, so cost will be less. But lots of people will be infected under threat of termination. Then you have the dual "we recommend going back to work in in 5 days where there are lots of people, but don't go to a New Years Eve party where there are people.../3
The "Omicron is less severe" mantra based on one data point without looking at the rest/possible causes is infuriating, because it leads people to terrible decisions. "Less severe" is based on hospitalizations. Maybe because its less severe. But other factors are skewing data../1
...when Delta hit, we had a significant number of people who were vaccinated and within the period of time in which the vaccines had not waned below strong effectiveness. We know that *now* that is not true. If you are six months out vaccinated, and not boostered, you are at.../2
...much higher risk of being infected by omicron than you were by Delta. Only 80% of Americans are boostered. That is why we are seeing things like 30% of the people reported as infected by Omicron in Philadelphia as being vaccinated. The people have a../3 inquirer.com/health/coronav…
The statistical and research reporting on Omicron seems so desperate for good news that it is hyping information that may be completely misleading, buries what the researchers say, or ignores the nature of the variant, Let's show a few of today's worst. In today's NYT:.../1
...GREAT news, right? Until we get further into the story, with a paragraph that proves Trump's old adage: Less testing lowers numbers. How much has testing dropped? How much has that contributed to the change? No one says..../2
...Now, probably the worst one. And this one really angers me. When we first had the "Omicron is less severe" articles about the initial research coming out of South Africa, the researchers cautioned that this information was likely inapplicable to much of the world because.../3
The Wisconsin parade massacre brings me to something followers may find surprising: I support the death penalty, but not in the way it is or has been ever applied in America. This is different, and somewhat complex, so please read this all before commenting. There are.../1
...elements of thinking about punishment for crime: One involves the egregiousness of the crime, the kind of crime that shocks the conscience. This crime fits that: The willful murder of children and the elderly during a Christmas parade for what appears to be simply.../2
...an attempt to escape another crime is abhorrent to the soul. Other than someone having a heart attack at the wheel, it is hard to conceive of anything that would make this less horrific. Then there is the issue of deterrence - not to others, but to the perpetrator. The.../3
Recently, I gave a deep dive why - based on the law & evidence presented at trial - the Rittenhouse verdict was correct, even though he's a miserable punk & the GOP celebration is obscene. Today, a new point: the case shows why open carry laws are a threat to this country.../1
...as I wrote in the last thread, all that mattered in treaching the verdict was Rittenhouse's state of mind: did he believe he was in imminent threat of bodily harm. Thats the law. The evidence supported his belief of that was reasonable. However, it *also* supported that.../2
...his victims - Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz - could believe *Rittenhouse* posed an imminent threat of bodily harm *to them.* Eliminate Rosenbaum, because his case is more complex. No doubt, Huber & Grosskreutz were reasonable in seeing Rittenhouse as an active shooter..../3