ICYMI: My column on CrowdStrike, the DNC-linked cyber security firm that remains the only source of the claim that the Russians hacked the DNC in early 2016. DNC refused to surrender the system to the FBI despite multiple requests: amgreatness.com/2019/09/25/ukr…
Senator Burr: Did the FBI request access to those devices to perform forensics on them?
Comey: Yes, we did.
Burr: Were you given access to do the forensics?
Comey: We were not. A highly respected private company got access and shared with us what they saw there.
Sounds legit.
“Former CIA Director John Brennan lifted much of the CrowdStrike paper for his infamous January 2017 intelligence community assessment about Russian election interference.”
Here’s the only NYT article on CrowdStrike—a snow job that claims Trump’s interest in the firm is part of a “conspiracy.” Doesn’t mention that Perkins Coie, the same law firm that hired Fusion in 2016 to dig up dirt on Trump, also hired CrowdStrike. nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/…
“It is true that the servers themselves were not physically examined by the FBI but CrowdStrike, which has a former senior F.B.I. official on its executive team, gave forensic evidence to federal investigators, including exact replicas of the data contained on the servers.” LOL
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DOJ just changed the official name of its J6 investigation from “Capitol breach” to “Capitol siege.”
This new stunt, just like January 6 itself, is an orchestrated effort btw Democrats and Capitol police to demonize foes of the Biden regime and silence criminal dissent:
As I wrote today, DOJ opened a “Capitol siege” section in DOJs criminal division and is looking to hire at least 20 new lawyers to expand its abusive, vengeful prosecution of Trump supporters.
Sure, be outraged at Trudeau. What about tyranny here?
Judge Mehta, after making numerous pretrial conclusions in his lengthy motion related to Trump today, now considering whether Stewart Rhodes should remain incarcerated before trial.
Mehta “concerned” about the timing of Rhodes’ legal purchases of guns after January 6. Rhodes is Person One in the Oath Keepers conspiracy case and to fend off criticism, DOJ charged him a year after January 6 with “seditious conspiracy.”
First major trial of a J6 defendant is set to begin later this month.
DOJ already in some hot water with the judge, who notes jury instructions and other indictments still claim Kamala Harris was in the Capitol during the protest--she was not in the building. h/t @joshgerstein
I explained why DOJs falsehood about Harris' whereabouts is relevant to thousands of misdemeanor charges. Judge McFadden also scolded DOJ for perpetuating the lie before a grand jury:
Reffitt was charged six months after January 6 on a firearms violation--DOJ accused him of having a gun at the Capitol after DOJ and Wray had to admit no one had been charged with carrying a firearm that day.
But looks like DOJ only has proof of Reffitt carrying a holster...
No “they” didn’t hold any trips or missions: Steve Robeson, the convicted felon and FBI informant, organized every trip and paid for all of them with FBI funds.
Btw, notice familiar language btw Whitmer plot and Oath Keepers case?
Now I assume @ninaburleigh, who accused me of bad journalism, knows how deeply involved the FBI was in these trips. Funny it’s not mentioned in her article:
My write-up on Judge McFadden's order that blasted DOJ for "misleading" a grand jury for a year about Kamala Harris' whereabouts on January 6 and denying DOJ requests to limit cross-exam of Secret Service to confirm Pence's whereabouts.