, 13 tweets, 4 min read
CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX; scientifically proven.

CONFIRMING MY EARLIER THREAD (at the end).

LATEST ON CLIMATE CHANGE SINCE 7-12-2019.

"Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures".

naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-cli…
CITES PROOF:

"NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE SIGNIFICANT ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE"

"In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature."

arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165…
AND VALIDATES my thread:

"IN SEARCH OF CLIMATE SCIENCE" which includes many supporting links and THIS important LINK:

"Head of Key Meteorological Organization Slams Climate Extremists, in Unprecedented Move"

THREAD: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1176399…
A KEY QUESTION among the 'open-ended questions' in my thread above was:

"Strong negative climatic feedbacks prohibit catastrophic warming: what is the roll of warming and water vapor?"

THE 'SCIENTIFIC REPORT' further ABOVE answers that question.
Conclusion:

"We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature.
A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide.

That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C.
Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10%, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature."

/end
@threadreaderapp please unroll; much thanks!
ADDENDUM:

"Physicists: CO2 Molecules Retain Heat Just 0.0001 Of A Second, Meaning CO2-Driven Warming ‘Not Possible’."
- Kenneth Richard
- 17 October 2019

notrickszone.com/2019/10/17/phy…
The ADDENDUM report states:

"Mainstream climate science claims CO2 molecules “slow down the rate of heat-loss from the surface” like a blanket does. And yet the rate at which a CO2 molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second."
And the ADDENDUM report continues:

"A CO2 concentration of 300 ppm versus 400 ppm will therefore have no detectable impact."

"Consequently, Nahle concludes “carbon dioxide has not an effect on climate changes or warming periods on the Earth”.
NOTE in the ADDENDUM report:

"Professor Nasif Nahle has mathematically assessed the rate at which heat is retained by CO2 molecules; his work was endorsed by the Faculty of Physics of the University of Nuevo Leon (Mexico)."

/end ADDENDUM
@threadreaderapp please unroll; much thanks!
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Gerardus T. Hauwert

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!