I went to the BBC today for the afternoon session of a day of talks to launch the BBC's Top 100 Women of 2019. I nearly didn't make it as what I thought was my ticket wasn't a ticket but merely a promise that I might get a ticket.
Always read the small print/1 #100Women
Someone thought I might be on the VIP list (please don't) and I was ushered in. The VIP people checked, no, not on the list, but you can go in anyway. So I got a silver armband not a plebby sticker and got to sit at the front.
This was all a mixup not a conspiracy/2 #100Women
I saw one of the co-hosts was Sofie Hagen and thought great it is the lovely Danish actor from The Killing. Luckily I kept this to myself, as it turned out to be a Danish stand-up @SofieHagen #100Women /3
First up was Jung Chang, who wrote Wild Swans, a devastating expose of living under Maoism. She was talking about "writing real women" an odd box to put her in. But she pointed out it was a pre-revolutionary woman ruler who ended foot-binding. Hey, Peter Tatchell!/4 #100Women
Next, Lisa Campo-Engelstein talking about her research into the male pill. It seems it is some sort of reverse sexism or gender stereotyping that has prevented this being made rather than women, once they could, thinking fantastic I can control when I get pregnant/5 #100Women
She thinks more sex ed would help make the idea of a male pill more acceptable. More LGBTQ+ sex ed. Though quite how this would change how babies are made she didn't elaborate. Also said men do get side effects when women get pregnant in case you didn't know. I didn't/6 #100Women
Then Katrina Johnston-Zimmerman an urban anthropologist. Cities are made by men & not good for women. Literally everything has been made by men until now, this minute, 2019. Her ideas only made sense if you imagined she'd thought them up while drunk, reading Engels/7 #100Women
A break and then more Sofie doing a bit of an intro to the gender talk. Got the humorous take on "sex isn't binary and the 100s of genders, as many as there are in the audience possibly". A bit about men, vaginas, women and penises not being what we thought/8 #100Women
Then writers Owl Fisher and Sharan Dhaliwal talking about the future of gender identities (I was hoping GIs wouldn't have much of a future but kept that to myself) Owl said there was a terrible backlash against LGBTetc and the UK is the most extreme/9 #100Women
Sharan - she's cis - said we are on a cliff edge on the issue of marginalisation in the UK. Her bgd is Indian so lots of talk about colonialism and how the Raj criminalised homosexuality. India must have been like Old Compton St before that. Who knew?/10 #100Women
I asked if either were worried about the rapid rise in girls saying they are trans. They looked a bit put out at someone questioning the trans narrative. Owl said it was a medical matter and not for them. Strange, as Owl has written a book for trans teens/11 #100Women
There was a bit of talk about international pronoun day. Someone in the audience asked if the curriculum would be changed in schools to teach this new language. This was not a joke question. It was answered seriously by our panel/12 #100Women
Joy, good next speaker a Kuwaiti woman who spoke about Arab women and politics. Alanoud Alsharekh. She spoke about actual women in the real world. Her take was possibly more upbeat that you would imagine if you look at Saudi but it was interesting. Big clap from me/13 #100Women
Last speaker was brilliant, Dr Veronique Thouvenot who heads a big UN backed campaign Zero Women Die. zeromothersdie.org
The campaign is doing real work to help women who don't have access to good maternity care.Via mobile phones. Not a pregnant person in sight/14 #100Women
I read this brilliant new post from @Transgendertrd on my way home. Real words in a real order making real sense in the real world and #100Women bar the last two speakers didn't seem very significant at all. transgendertrend.com/health-researc…
Ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When is the govt going to close the loophole that lets GenderGP operate here?
Mother of 10-yr-old wants puberty blockers for her daughter who 'came out' at five. 1/ gendergp.com/fighting-for-c…
Every red flag is here. Sex stereotypes used to understand children, separated parents who don't agree on this, ADHD diagnosis, anxiety. This child needs good neutral investigative therapy. Refer'd to the Tavi 4 yrs ago, where caution was advised. 2/
But the child went there with a diagnosis 'she is a boy' and had been socially affirmed since 5-yr-old. CAMHS has been involved for the ADHD. Mum doesn't want drugs for that as they 'change personality' But wants puberty blockers for pre-pubescent child. 3/
It's not just the 'born in the wrong body' narrative that's the problem.
Here are some more examples of harmful ideology aimed at children. 1/ THREAD
From Stonewall's primary school curriculum for children aged 4 and up:
"make your PSHE sessions trans inclusive by referring to 'most girls' or 'most boys' when learning about body parts and puberty." 2/
And this from Scarleteen.com another sex ed provider for young people:
"Girldick, otherwise known as clits, lady bits, a shenis, or just someone's genitals or junk is the affectionate name some people use to refer to their own or other women's penises" 3/
Latest guidance from the DfE on RSE teaching. This is a major step forward in ensuring that 'gender identity' is not taught in schools and that organisations promoting the idea are not invited into classrooms.
Glad to see the DfE reinforcing the idea that teachers must not go behind parents' backs if a pupil expresses gender discomfort. No more trans affirmation and changing names etc without involving parents.
This is a major ground breaking step forward by the DfE and will give parents the right to make sure that children are not being taught a form of 'queer theory for kids' or being told that they could have been born in the wrong body
The Manchester based LGBT charity, The Proud Trust, was given £100,00 from the Tampon Tax Fund to work with disadvantaged lesbian & bisexual women. The project was based on their Sexuality aGender toolkit, aimed at all young people from 13 up. 1/
The toolkit features the "Dice Game". 2 dice are rolled and young people are asked to describe the sexual activity which happens when the two body parts named on the dice face upwards. This is a template to make your own dice. 2/
This is the “Body Parts Combination Grid” which describes the possible sexual activity. 3/
Read how the Proud Trust uses money from the Tampon Tax Fund to promote its sex health toolkit, Sexuality aGender.
This guide includes gratuitous images of the most extreme form of FGM (stage 3) as part of their belief in "genital variation" transgendertrend.com/proud-trust-no…
I have described but not included the images as they as voyeuristic and upsetting. Why is this guide marketed as something for 13-yr-olds? FGM is a criminal assault on girls, not a different type of vulva.
The toolkit tells children to cut out the disembodied images of genitals to "create" their own "genital gallery". "Some young people may want to colour their creations in, others may add other embellishments from other arts and crafts materials that you have available!"
Policy capture with added boasting.
"The National LGB&T Partnership has established a close working relationship with the National LGBT Health Adviser, Dr Michael Brady. We meet with Dr Brady and his team regularly..." 1/4
".. and act as a conduit for the relationship between Dr Brady’s Office (and by extension NHSE) and the LGBT+ VCSE Sector. We organise and arrange engagement events of various formats and sizes between the sector and Dr Brady’s Office," 2/4
"and work closely with him and his colleagues to inform, support and provide direction for his workplan. "
Read that again "direction for his workplan" 3/4 @JackieDP