Because we know since well before October of last year, Durham was one of the US Attorneys leading the investigation into the SpyGate plotters for all the leaking they'd been doing.
And Durham was likely leading several of them.
Including the one into former FBI General Counsel James Baker.
***IF*** a crack US Attorney like Durham was assigned to investigate the targeted, strategic leaking the SpyGate plotters had been doing, calling up news media allies to leak classified info to them, what would that US Attorney end up learning?
In other words, by investigating the LEAKS, Durham ends up getting a real education into what the SpyGate plot was and how it went down.
1) General Flynn
2) Paul Manafort
3) George Papadopoulos
But the "27 leak investigations" were quite real.
This is so absurd I can't even quite believe that I have to refute it. Again. For like, the 100th time.
I've had to push back quite strongly for some time now against these guys.
SHITCAN IT and flush it all down the toilet.
And you can quote me on that.
So they can leak bits & pieces to drive the narratives they want to sell.
None of these people are getting what they wanted, so they sell alternative narratives to the public why.
Sessions was doing his job rooting out a corrupt leaking culture & when it was time for him to go, he departed & Barr came in for the clean up.
Ongoing DOJ leak/Spygate investigations were PROTECED by professionals DOING THEIR JOB.
By the time Sessions & Rosenstein & that new crack FBI leak-hunting unit they created were done with their work, all the leaks were plugged.
Big sea change from when Trump came into office.
And amazing how many people never stop to wonder exactly why that is.
Go back and look again.
but several times he ***did*** talk about what was going on underneath the surface.
But of course, "smart people" didn't believe him, labeled him a liar.
Sessions was targeted by the SpyGate plotters, smeared & investigated as a Russian asset & quite likely spied on by them during the 2016 election as Trump team member
You ***CAN'T*** be in charge of overseeing investigations of people who committed CRIMES AGAINST YOU.
It's not allowed, I don't care what someone claimed to you.
But cover stories work because they contain elements that people WANT TO BELIEVE.
Look at the cover story over the past month with Trump suddenly stupidly doing that 'full Syria pullout' that really wasn't a full Syria pullout.
2) Massive pushback over abandoning the Kurds
3) Pullout begins
5) We knew where Baghdadi was for weeks & Trump THANKS THE SYRIANS, KURDS & RUSSIANS for helping us kill him.
Figure it out yet?
Trump is the first President to get serious about stopping the leaking & fighting the Fake News Media & Democrats by using their own disinformation tactics against them.
Ponder that for a second. Or two.
Which is why he DOES IT SO OFTEN.
It's wrong to do that.
As Wictor says often, a lot of what you see with Trump isn't REAL. He's Alinskying his opposition.
Which is how the DOJ is SUPPOSED to do it's work.
They often won't even announce an investigation was happening until it's over & only if an indictment is issued.
These guys don't leak AND they don't volunteer info about ongoing investigations.
And when you slander these people, it angers me.