‘What happens if and when we get there? As the left is just now beginning to realise, this achievement would be the start and not the end of the story. Relatively speaking, getting elected may prove the easy part...’ #VoteLabour2019tribunemag.co.uk/2019/05/what-a…
But the biggest danger facing the left today is no longer a shortage of ideas or a lack of positive vision. The biggest danger is lack of preparedness—that we are not yet ready for the hard work of turning that vision into reality.
If the left has been unused to being propositional, it has been even less used to holding and wielding power. If we are serious about fundamentally transforming our economy, we must rapidly build our understanding of the scale of the challenge ahead.
We must develop a clear strategy for carrying through this agenda for change. And we must build the social forces that can give it real power, buttressing it against the inevitable backlash from vested interests.
To do this, we will need four things. First, we need a clear understanding of the nature of the transformation we are trying to achieve, a power analysis of the political forces for and against it, and the levers we have available to tip that balance.
Just as Thatcher’s Conservatives drew up tough-minded battle plans for privatisation—identifying the industries where they were strong and those where they were weak, anticipating where they could press home their advantage and where they would need to make compromises...
...so we must do the same for the democratisation of ownership and creation of a new economy.
As part of this we must identify flagship measures—our own equivalents of Thatcher’s “Right To Buy” policy of mass council house sales—that both carry a new story about ownership and give millions of people a stake in that new story.
Second we must be ready for reaction from those who stand to lose from our political programme. A radical redistribution of ownership to the many and away from the few is unlikely to pass without challenge from the current owners whose prosperity rests on their control of assets.
And history tells us that global financial markets can and often do sink radical left governments. Capital flight, investment strikes, foreign exchange crises, trade retaliation—all are possible, whether as market reactions or deliberately administered punishment beatings.
Thirdly, we must be ready to transform the institutions of government themselves so they are fit to deliver the project. The civil service is specifically designed to ensure continuity between governments.
At times of radical discontinuity, when the new government is committed precisely to overturning the assumptions and orthodoxies that have shaped previous governments, this can become a major problem.
An incoming Labour government will need to exorcise the “ghost in the machine” in Whitehall, or it will be operating with a set of tools that is simply not designed to serve a new agenda.
This will require some bureaucratic changes, but it is not simply a matter of replacing a neoliberal technocracy with a progressive technocracy.
The real prize is radical decentralisation and democratisation, breaking up the power relations of the old ways whilst also building the foundations for a new politics.
Finally, we must build a strong ecosystem of social movements and “organic intellectuals”—Gramsci’s term for the thinkers who emerge from social movements and excluded classes and groups, and are capable of articulating their politics, culture, and concerns.
Radical governments cannot succeed without a strong mass base of support—not just for their government but, crucially, for their ideas.
This support must be independent, capable not only of defending the government when its agenda comes under attack, but also of keeping it on course when the pressures of governing push it away from radical change.
The institutional base of the UK left is not yet strong enough to sustain the kind of project we have outlined. It is therefore critical that we invest now.
We must build collective popular power and agency through social movements and politically informed community organising.
At the same time, we must build the practical economic alternatives from the ground up that will help form the backbone of the new economy, from public banks to worker co-operatives and community land trusts.
We must also build new narratives, including by raising our game in media and communications, and new ideas, through new think tanks and popular education programmes.
And, through all these things, we must begin to build the next cohorts of progressive political, intellectual, and community leaders.
People Get Ready is not about providing detailed blueprints, either for a future Labour government or for the social movements that will underpin it. It is about sketching the shape of the task ahead.
More than anything, it is an invitation and a challenge to everyone supportive of the Corbyn project to play their part—and to recognise that our job extends much, much further than simply getting a radical Labour government elected and installed at Westminster and in Whitehall.
One of the most unforgivable things about Starmer and his Labour Right faction—and a big part of why we find ourselves where we are today with a despised government having boxed itself into a corner—is the stupidity of the conversation on the economy they’ve imposed on everybody.
Far too many people who should have known better went along with all that. Household budgets, maxed out credit cards, black holes, magic growth fairy and much more idiocy besides. At one point they even rhetorically abolished the notion of any conflict between capital and labour!
Well—to use their own stupid household analogy—those bills have now come due politically. And they have left themselves with literally no place to go. Their imminent collapse is borne of their own spectacular hubris and short-sightedness, a downfall entirely of their own making.
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you.
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day One:
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you.
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
Day Two:
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you.
One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order.
No explanations, no reviews, just covers.
The Labour Right has misjudged the function of the right-wing media, which is to distract from any challenge to wealth and power. For a time they were united in destroying the Labour left. But now—material conditions remaining what they are—the focus will be Starmer’s government.
The assumption was that, so long as Starmerite policy doesn’t challenge vested interests, they would be allowed to continue as before. But in the absence of bread someone must be recruited into the circus, and now they’re it.
Of course, the fact that they are so venal and corrupt means that it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. After years of politics on easy mode, they are suddenly in the firing line. And the polls show how well they are handling it.
A thread with a few eve-of-poll thoughts about the politics of this British general election and where it is likely to leave those of us committed to transformative political-economic change both ideologically and as a practical necessity. 🧵👇🏼
So ends the most delusional general election campaign in modern British history.
The vote seems largely a foregone conclusion, with a collapsing Conservative Party barely capable of going through the motions, able to summon only enough energy to place a few insider bets on their own impending demise.
The idea that the problem with Starmer is insufficient ‘boldness,’ rather than that he has the wrong policies in the wrong interests, is a failure of analysis and understanding that will become apparent very quickly. His commitments aren’t right but insufficient, they are wrong!
Starmer’s positions are:
-Privatisation
-Financialisation
-Derisking
-Authoritarian policing
-Atlanticist foreign policy
-Austerity
-Trickle-down economics
-Growth
-Constitutional status quo/unionism
-British nationalism
-Purge the left
There is nothing in this programme that most of the Conservative Party of the past 14 years couldn’t agree with. The remarkable thing is selling it (again!) to most of the Labour Party.
We’re in a time of decay and slow-motion system collapse that looks something like crisis-punctuated stagnation. In the in-between times the ‘normal’ rules of neoliberalism apply—or are reapplied—like a force of gravity, a dead weight on the present that prevents new departures.
But periodic crisis interruptions force new interventions—bailouts, QE, furlough payments, etc.—that are outside the bounds of the ‘normal’ operations of the system, sudden lurches or interventions that then have to be closed down and the genie reinterred in the systemic bottle.
Needless to say, this is an unstable and unsustainable state. So while stagnation reigns, and political exits are blocked off as best can be managed by and within the system, a dynamic process of decay and dissolution is also at work.