, 3 tweets, 2 min read
The government, rather than indicating that no Brady material exists, instead makes the argument that it had no obligation to provide it because there wasn’t a technical “case” yet. It’s a VERY weak position to argue from, and they open with it. There are several more points
And there’s been great threads so far on this. As for me, I’ve had a really horrible day and I’m just not feeling great so I’m taking it easy. I’ll lend my two cents if there’s anything additional tomorrow or Sunday in anticipation for Monday’s response response response.
For now, I’ve retweeted some great analysis and the governments response actually answers some of the questions I had in my initial thread after @SidneyPowell1 filed her reply last week. Check out @JohnWHuber and @Techno_Fog for more.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Tracy Beanz

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!