Continuing our discussion about all the evidence that exonerates #RodneyReed and implicates Jimmy Fennell in this thread...
Police suspected that Jimmy Fennell was involved in the murder of Stacey Stites almost immediately.
Despite their suspicions about Fennell, the police failed to search the apartment Stacey Stites shared with him. The apartment was the last place Stacey was seen alive, so it would have been basic police work to look around inside her last known location.
Prosecutors pinned their whole case on the DNA recovered from three sperm cells found inside Stacey's body. They claim that that is a smoking gun. In reality, the police knew that the DNA did not match Fennell soon after the murder. They still pursued him as the primary suspect.
Police aggressively interrogated Jimmy Fennell several times. He failed two different polygraph tests when he was asked if he strangled Stacey Stites. After failing the second polygraph, Fennell refused to cooperate with the investigation and police basically let him go.
Police interviewed many of Stacey's friends and co-workers. Several of them reported that Stacey had shared concerning information about Jimmy Fennell.
One of Stacey's friends and co-workers told police: "Jimmy was a jealous type person who didn't like her talking with other guys. They cancelled their wedding. Stacey never said why."
Notes from another friend's statement: "Jimmy got upset with Stacey when he found out she was going out with her friends. Jimmy wouldn't let her talk on the phone with her friends. Stacey always said she loved Jimmy. They would set wedding dates, then call it off."
Another friend saw Stacey one week before she was murdered. Notes from his statement to police: "She seemed down quite a bit and he asked her what was wrong. She told him that her and her boyfriend were having problems. And also that the boyfriend had a violent temper."
Notes from a police interview indicate that Stacey's own mother told investigators that Jimmy Fennell was "jealous of everyone." See the investigator's note:
Interestingly, none of the police interrogations of Jimmy Fennell were audio or video-recorded. All interrogations of Rodney Reed were recorded. Were police not interested in recording any incriminating statements made by Fennell?
The police probably were suspicious of Jimmy Fennell because he lied and told inconsistent stories about what he was doing in the days before Stacey was murdered. His actions in the aftermath of Stacey’s disappearance and the discovery of her body were also suspicious.
On the morning of Stacey’s disappearance, Fennell told investigators that he had filled the gas tank in his truck the previous night. Police confronted him with the fact that the tank was actually only 1/4 full. Fennell changed his story.
Also on the morning of Stacey’s disappearance, but before her body was discovered, Jimmy Fennell withdrew all of the money from the bank account he shared with Stacey.
Within days of Stacey’s murder, Jimmy Fennell sold the truck that he claimed Stacey had been driving when she disappeared. Was there incriminating evidence in the truck?
In October 1996, Jimmy Fennell failed a polygraph when he was asked “Did you strangle Stacey Stites?” In December 1996, Fennell failed another polygraph when he was asked “Did you strangle Stacey with her belt?” and “Did you leave Stacey’s body along that country road?”
After Jimmy Fennell failed the second polygraph exam when he was asked if he murdered Stacey Stites, he refused to cooperate with the investigation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The execution of Marcellus Williams is a horrible injustice. This didn’t have to happen. Just a couple weeks ago, prosecutors—with the support of the victim’s family—had reached a plea agreement with Marcellus that took death off the table.
Missouri AG Andrew Bailey and the Missouri Supreme Court scuttled that agreement without any regard for the wishes of the victim's family. A week later, the trial court judge reversed course and blocked efforts by St. Louis County prosecutors to vacate Marcellus’s conviction.
This wasn’t the first time Marcellus faced execution. Back in 2017, he came within hours of death before then-Gov. Greitens formed a Board of Inquiry to look into all the problems with the case. Gov. Parson took over and disbanded the Board before they could finish their job.
It’s outrageous that Missouri is so close to executing Marcellus Williams. He was convicted at a trial where prosecutors intentionally struck at least one Black person from the jury pool. Witnesses were paid to point the finger at Marcellus. His DNA is not on the murder weapon.
Trial prosecutors handled the murder weapon without gloves, irreparably contaminating it. The current St. Louis County prosecuting attorney admitted fault and was willing to enter a plea agreement where Marcellus would be re-sentenced to life in prison.
A judge initially accepted that agreement, only to reverse course a week later. The legal system has failed Marcellus Williams over and over again. It’s unconscionable for Missouri to move forward with this execution in the face of such grave doubts.
The State of Texas killed Ivan Cantu last night. I was there with him, standing near his face, holding his hand, and praying into his ear until the chemicals killed him. God's grace was with him and with me.
He was one of the most faith-filled, self-directed people I have ever encountered. His strength helped me. His last words were directed calmly and clearly to the victims' families watching him die from the witness chambers.
"I did not kill James Mosqueda and Amy Kitchen. If I had known who killed them I would have gotten the information to you in any way I could. But I did not kill them and if your hope in coming here is because you seek closure or peace, I'm afraid you’re going to be disappointed."
Yesterday, Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond filed a brief in support on one of Richard Glossip's pending appeals at the U.S. Supreme Court. AG Drummond agrees that Richard is entitled to a new trial due to prosecutorial misconduct.
AG Drummond presents the question before the Supreme Court in the case:
AG Drummond's brief begins: "The State of Oklahoma, acting through its chief law enforcement officer, recently made the difficult decision to confess error and support vacating the conviction of petitioner Richard Eugene Glossip."
Unless a court intervenes, Missouri will execute Michael Tisius tomorrow, June 6th. When Michael was 19 years old, he made a terrible mistake and killed two jailers while attempting to free a former cellmate. But Michael is not the worst of the worst and does not deserve to die.
Michael's difficulties began before he was born. His mother, Patty, was abandoned by her own mother at a young age. Patty's father died suddenly when she was 13 years old.
Patty's life took a bad turn when she was returned to the custody of her mother, who took 13-year-old Patty out drinking at local bars until late at night almost every day. Patty became pregnant with her first son, Joey, at just 17 years old.
Today is the 20th World Day Against the Death Penalty, with a focus this year on the relationship between capital punishment and torture. The entire death penalty process is torturous for every person involved.
Those on death row spend decades awaiting the eventual day when the government will take them into a room, render them defenseless, and kill them through one of several torturous methods of execution. This is mental torture.
In some cases, the execution eventually happens. In many other cases, the execution is never carried out. People on death row live out every day not knowing if or when the government will legally kill them. This is another form of mental torture.