Lots of people asking me to point to evidence of God published in a science journal.
Well, don't be dippy, and here's why...
Well, don't be dippy, and here's why...
Neither proof of God nor proof of the universe have ever or ever could be published in a science journal for reasons of self-reference from set theory.
To doubt God for lack of published evidence, you have to doubt the universe just as much - which is absurd, as you are in it!
To doubt God for lack of published evidence, you have to doubt the universe just as much - which is absurd, as you are in it!
You cannot provide proof of the universe from within it for the same reason that a torch cannot see itself with its own light.
This is basically Godel's set theorem made simple...
This is basically Godel's set theorem made simple...
You have to transcend a totality in order to prove it exists. Therefore science can only ever reveal knowledge of parts, not wholes. Therefore science can never prove the existence of God (or the universe). But God CAN prove himself to you, as he transcends you.
But science can certainly POINT to the existence of God, without proving it completely. If there were no evidence at all it would be very strange. But in reality the evidence shines forth from almost everywhere you look in science, as with the whole of life. Happy weekend 😎
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
