Today on #CampaignCheck: The Liberal Democrats claim that they're now the party of "sound finance" with the toughest fiscal rules. bbc.co.uk/news/av/electi… This would be a big deal. Have they really taken the Tories' place as the party of fiscal discipline? To find out read on...
There are broadly speaking two kinds of fiscal rules. One which limits day-to-day spending/borrowing - CURRENT spending. The second kind puts limits on how much you can invest - CAPITAL spending. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it's worth emphasising:
ALL major UK parties (Con, Lab, LD) are loosening fiscal rules this election. ALL their plans imply govt will carry on notching up deficits as far as the eye can see. Most of this new spending will be on INVESTMENT. Key differentiator for the LibDems is on current spending...
Tories & Labour both propose balancing the current budget over a 3yr & 5yr horizon respectively. Their rules give them some (not much) headroom to spend more or cut taxes. This chart shows you broadly how much (NB Tory prob have more headroom following today's C-tax cut u-turn)
LibDem rule is to target a 1% of GDP SURPLUS on the current budget. In other words, it looks a lot tougher than the others' rules (the yellow line here). That implies cuts/tax rises - tho they say there'll be a "remain dividend" that will bring in money to help meet the target
But here's the thing, that target, designed by the @resfoundation, has some important small print (see below). It's better described as a "range" rather than a simple number target. If the economy disappoints the rule will allow the LibDems to borrow, well, quite a lot
In other words, the LibDem fiscal rule is actually better depicted like this: a massive range which, esp in the event of a recession, could allow them to borrow even more than the major two parties.
The LibDem rule on the current budget is in some ways more sensible than the other parties', which look quite inflexible. If there is a recession there's a sig chance Lab/Con bust their rules overnight. BUT do the LibDems really have TOUGHER rules than the others? Not really.
Esp when u consider what they're spending on investment: basically smack bang between Tories and Labour. "Sound finance"? "the party of fiscal responsibility"? Hmm, not quite. Rules maybe slightly better-structured but it's not clear they're much tougher #campaigncheck
I'm told the LibDems are also adopting the @resfoundation rule on investment: "to deliver an improvement in public sector net worth". Basically the same rule as Labour. They'll ask the NAO or OBR to regulate it and ensure those investments are sensible...
This @resfoundation report has been used as the blueprint for new fiscal rules for:
Conservatives ✅
Labour✅
And now the LibDems✅
raising a question: has ANY single recent think tank report had as much influence on economic policy? resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW
"Data center alley" in North Virginia.
Home to the biggest cluster of server centres in the world.
Here, more than anywhere else, is the global epicentre of AI.
It's where the recent AWS outage happened.
And we've secured rare access INSIDE one of the data centres...
The inside of one of the centres, run by Digital Realty, one of the biggest datacenter companies in the world.
Extremely high security. Long, long corridors, flanked by rooms in which those servers are operating.
This is the very heart of the biggest economic story right now
And inside one of those rooms, here is one of the supercomputers powering the AI boom. This Nvidia DGX H100 is the physical infrastructure making AI a reality.
🚨EXCLUSIVE
The firm at the heart of Britain's critical minerals strategy has ditched plans for a rare earths refinery in the UK, and will build it in the US instead.
It's a serious blow to the Chancellor and her plans for "securonomics" ahead of next month's Budget👇
Not long ago Pensana was being hailed as key to Britain's industrial future.
It had plans to ship rare earth ores to the UK and refine them in a plant just outside Hull, creating 126 jobs and bringing in hundreds of millions of pounds of investment...
Its Saltend site was where the then Biz sec Kwasi Kwarteng launched the govt's official critical minerals strategy a few years ago, saying: "This incredible facility will be the only of its kind in Europe and will help secure the resilience of Britain's supplies into the future"
📽️Is Britain REALLY facing a 1970s-style fiscal crisis?
Why are investors so freaked out about UK debt?
Is this REALLY worse than under Liz Truss?
Who's to blame? Rachel Reeves? The Bank of England?
And would a bit of productivity really solve everything?
📈 Your 6 min primer👇
OK, so let's break it down.
Start with the chart everyone (well, everyone in Whitehall) is talking about.
The 30yr UK government bond yield. Up to the highest level since 1998. And it's still rising.
Does this mean the UK is facing a fiscal crisis? Let's look at the evidence
First let's compare the UK to other G7 countries.
There's two ways to do this.
First, look at absolute levels👇
And it looks pretty awkward for the UK.
Pre-mini Budget we were middle of the pack. That changed post-Truss. And now, under Labour, the UK is even more of an outlier.
👗Billions of pounds of imports...
↗️Rising by more than 50% a year...
🛬Planes stuffed with cheap clothes...
🇨🇳And a loophole saving Chinese companies from £billions of UK taxes.
Behind the scenes of one of the biggest stories in the modern economy: e-commerce
👇
We've spent months investigating this phenomenon.
- We've got the first official estimate of the scale of cheap untaxed imports into the UK.
- We've seen inside the planes carrying these goods here.
- A whole logistics industry is growing around it.
This is a v big deal!
The story begins with a MASSIVE rise in orders from Chinese e-commerce giants like SHEIN and Temu.
Now, most coverage of these brands focuses on labour standards. An important issue.
But there's something else going on here - something deeper.
A shift in how trade works...
🧵Some thoughts re inflation.
Not the data today, but two deep issues we should prob spend more time thinking about. 1. While economists and policymakers may have convinced themselves that the cost of living squeeze is over, for millions of households, it doesn't feel that way.
The key thing to remember here is that when economists talk about inflation what they're really talking about is the ANNUAL RATE at which a basket of goods and services changes price. And certainly, that rate is much lower than the 2022 peaks...
But, as I say, what that number is is simply looking at the difference in the LEVEL of prices over the past year. This chart is that level. (The actual consumer price index!).
And yes, look over the year to May and it's up 3.4%.
🧵Why, barely 24 hours after the Spending Review, is everyone already going on about tax rises?
Are they REALLY coming?
Or is this an "incoherent argument", as one leading minister calls it?
Well here's a thread explaining what's really going on here.
Bear with me...
First things first.
Key thing to remember is that the main job of HMT is to generate enough money, mostly via taxes (left hand bar here), to finance all its spending (right hand bar).
If that left hand bar isn't high enough, we have to borrow to fill the gap.
That's the deficit!
This week's Spending Review was about the right hand column, obvs. But not ALL of the column.
Actually more than half of govt spending is on stuff that WASN'T covered by the spending review - on benefits, debt interest, pensions etc. It's called "annually managed expenditure"