Today on #CampaignCheck: The Liberal Democrats claim that they're now the party of "sound finance" with the toughest fiscal rules. bbc.co.uk/news/av/electi… This would be a big deal. Have they really taken the Tories' place as the party of fiscal discipline? To find out read on...
There are broadly speaking two kinds of fiscal rules. One which limits day-to-day spending/borrowing - CURRENT spending. The second kind puts limits on how much you can invest - CAPITAL spending. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it's worth emphasising:
ALL major UK parties (Con, Lab, LD) are loosening fiscal rules this election. ALL their plans imply govt will carry on notching up deficits as far as the eye can see. Most of this new spending will be on INVESTMENT. Key differentiator for the LibDems is on current spending...
Tories & Labour both propose balancing the current budget over a 3yr & 5yr horizon respectively. Their rules give them some (not much) headroom to spend more or cut taxes. This chart shows you broadly how much (NB Tory prob have more headroom following today's C-tax cut u-turn)
LibDem rule is to target a 1% of GDP SURPLUS on the current budget. In other words, it looks a lot tougher than the others' rules (the yellow line here). That implies cuts/tax rises - tho they say there'll be a "remain dividend" that will bring in money to help meet the target
But here's the thing, that target, designed by the @resfoundation, has some important small print (see below). It's better described as a "range" rather than a simple number target. If the economy disappoints the rule will allow the LibDems to borrow, well, quite a lot
In other words, the LibDem fiscal rule is actually better depicted like this: a massive range which, esp in the event of a recession, could allow them to borrow even more than the major two parties.
The LibDem rule on the current budget is in some ways more sensible than the other parties', which look quite inflexible. If there is a recession there's a sig chance Lab/Con bust their rules overnight. BUT do the LibDems really have TOUGHER rules than the others? Not really.
Esp when u consider what they're spending on investment: basically smack bang between Tories and Labour. "Sound finance"? "the party of fiscal responsibility"? Hmm, not quite. Rules maybe slightly better-structured but it's not clear they're much tougher #campaigncheck
I'm told the LibDems are also adopting the @resfoundation rule on investment: "to deliver an improvement in public sector net worth". Basically the same rule as Labour. They'll ask the NAO or OBR to regulate it and ensure those investments are sensible...
This @resfoundation report has been used as the blueprint for new fiscal rules for:
Conservatives ✅
Labour✅
And now the LibDems✅
raising a question: has ANY single recent think tank report had as much influence on economic policy? resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵SALT🧵
It's been snowing in the UK and the road gritters are out in force, begging the question:
Have you ever wondered where that grit actually COMES from?
The answer is more magical, beautiful and fascinating than you probably realised.
1/14
Because that dirty-looking salt being spread by trucks on our roads is actually the remains of an ancient ocean (actually two ancient oceans), buried deep beneath our feet.
Most of the stuff being spread in London comes from a single mine in Cheshire - at Winsford.
2/14
Here, about 20 to 40m beneath the meadows of Cheshire, is an enormous slab of halite, rock salt, the remains of an ancient inland sea a couple of hundred million years ago.
This is where most of our salt comes from.
3/14
🧵How worried should we (and @RachelReevesMP) be about the slightly nervy reaction from financial markets towards her first Budget?
Short answer: certainly a bit worried.
But perhaps not for the reasons you might expect...
Worth saying at the outset: these markets are volatile.
Trying to interpret movements in govt bonds is v tricky.
They're moved by all sorts of factors - fiscal, monetary, economic and structural - from all over the world.
So yesterday's Budget is only one of many factors here...
Even so, there has been a marked rise in UK bond yields following the Budget which is greater than what we're seeing in other markets.
This morning the UK 10 year bond yield hit the highest level in nearly a year. It's up 1.7% since yday - far more than US or German equivalents
🚨Latest UK population numbers just landed.
Two headlines:
- The UK natural population (eg domestic births minus deaths) is now FALLING - at the fastest rate in modern history.
- Yet OVERALL population is rising at the fastest rate since 1948 🤯
How? Lemme explain...
🧵
Nearly every year since records began a century and a bit ago, more people in the UK were born than died.
In the year to 2023, that changed.
664k births. 681k deaths.
The net drop of 16k is the biggest on record (also in % terms).
It's a watershed moment for UK demographics.
Yet the overall UK population rose.
& not by a little:
...at the fastest rate in 76 years! A near 1% increase.
That's a massive change in the number of people in the country.
How? You probably already know the reason...
🚨This is the story of how UK & EU goods are STILL going into Russia in vast quantities, despite sanctions.
Of how the economic war waged by the G7 is failing.
Of how I witnessed sanctions rules broken in plain sight.
But above all else it’s the story of a chart... 🧵
Here’s the chart in question. It shows you UK car exports to Russia.
And there’s a clear story here.
Look: when Russia invaded Ukraine, the UK (and for that matter most of the G7) imposed sanctions on Russia. So exports of cars to Russia stopped.
End of story, right?
Wrong, because now look at what happened to exports of UK cars to countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia.
At precisely the same moment as sanctions were imposed on Russia, exports of these cars to Russian neighbours suddenly ROSE.
🧵Here’s the extraordinary story of a Frenchman who came up with an invention that changed the world, before events took a twist.
It’s a rollercoaster story that just might help us solve one of the biggest challenges facing humanity.
Sounds far-fetched, I know, but read on…
The man in question was Nicolas Leblanc.
Born in 1742, he trained as a doctor but was always short of cash. He became the physician to Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans - a minor French royal. Like many enlightened intellectuals, his hobby was scientific experimentation.
And when he heard about a scientific competition, launched by the French Academy of Sciences and backed by none other than King Louis XVI, he jumped at the chance. The prize of 2,400 livres (quite a lot - a few years of earnings) would go to whoever could turn salt into soda ash
🧵Want to understand why weaning ourselves off fossil fuels like oil is such a tricky challenge?
Best place to start is with this ubiquitous toy👇
This is a thread about what I call the LEGO conundrum.
It begins when you ponder what a LEGO brick is actually made of...
Standard Lego bricks are made of something called Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene.
ABS is a tough thermoplastic you often find in the handles of scissors or the frames of hard carry-on baggage cases.
But Lego bricks are prob the most iconic application. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrylonit…
It's worth saying btw not all Lego pieces are made out of ABS.
Baseplates are moulded from high impact polystyrene. Gearwheels are polyamide.
The small, flexible green pieces that look like plant stalks or flags are polyethylene, and so on and so on. lego.com/en-us/sustaina…