Today on #CampaignCheck: The Liberal Democrats claim that they're now the party of "sound finance" with the toughest fiscal rules. bbc.co.uk/news/av/electi… This would be a big deal. Have they really taken the Tories' place as the party of fiscal discipline? To find out read on...
There are broadly speaking two kinds of fiscal rules. One which limits day-to-day spending/borrowing - CURRENT spending. The second kind puts limits on how much you can invest - CAPITAL spending. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it's worth emphasising:
ALL major UK parties (Con, Lab, LD) are loosening fiscal rules this election. ALL their plans imply govt will carry on notching up deficits as far as the eye can see. Most of this new spending will be on INVESTMENT. Key differentiator for the LibDems is on current spending...
Tories & Labour both propose balancing the current budget over a 3yr & 5yr horizon respectively. Their rules give them some (not much) headroom to spend more or cut taxes. This chart shows you broadly how much (NB Tory prob have more headroom following today's C-tax cut u-turn)
LibDem rule is to target a 1% of GDP SURPLUS on the current budget. In other words, it looks a lot tougher than the others' rules (the yellow line here). That implies cuts/tax rises - tho they say there'll be a "remain dividend" that will bring in money to help meet the target
But here's the thing, that target, designed by the @resfoundation, has some important small print (see below). It's better described as a "range" rather than a simple number target. If the economy disappoints the rule will allow the LibDems to borrow, well, quite a lot
In other words, the LibDem fiscal rule is actually better depicted like this: a massive range which, esp in the event of a recession, could allow them to borrow even more than the major two parties.
The LibDem rule on the current budget is in some ways more sensible than the other parties', which look quite inflexible. If there is a recession there's a sig chance Lab/Con bust their rules overnight. BUT do the LibDems really have TOUGHER rules than the others? Not really.
Esp when u consider what they're spending on investment: basically smack bang between Tories and Labour. "Sound finance"? "the party of fiscal responsibility"? Hmm, not quite. Rules maybe slightly better-structured but it's not clear they're much tougher #campaigncheck
I'm told the LibDems are also adopting the @resfoundation rule on investment: "to deliver an improvement in public sector net worth". Basically the same rule as Labour. They'll ask the NAO or OBR to regulate it and ensure those investments are sensible...
This @resfoundation report has been used as the blueprint for new fiscal rules for:
Conservatives ✅
Labour✅
And now the LibDems✅
raising a question: has ANY single recent think tank report had as much influence on economic policy? resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're even half interested in energy, I bet you've seen this chart. I call it The Most Hopeful Chart in the World.
The point? We're embracing renewable power MUCH faster than expected.
Hurrah!
Only problem is, this chart has an evil twin. A chart we really need to discuss
🧵
The Most Hopeful Chart in the World shows how each year the @IEA predicted that the amount of solar output around the world would plateau or rise v slowly in the following years. But instead solar output defied all expectations, rising exponentially.
That's great news.
But making solar panels is an energy-intensive exercise.
You need a lot of coal to smelt down the silicon and a lot of power to turn metallurgical silicon into polysilicon, let alone the monocrystalline boules you really need for a decent solar module (read my book for more 📖)
🚜FARMAGEDDON🌾
The story of what's REALLY going on in farming. A story far more complex than the conventional wisdom.
This isn't just (or even mainly) about inheritance tax. It's about a cascade of challenges & crises that may ultimately threaten food security.
📽️5 min primer👇
Let's begin with that big, overarching issue: food security.
For most of the past century, farmers have been encouraged to grow as much food as possible. The story here goes back to WWII and its aftermath, when the conventional wisdom was the UK needed to be more self sufficient
Encouraged by the govt, the UK's domestic food production, which before WWII had dropped to just 35% of what we ate, rose rapidly to over 60%.
Some economists say self sufficiency is overrated. But it's one of those post-war principles that stuck.
By accident as much as design.
🚗What's happening to Europe's car industry is one of the biggest stories in the world right now, & prob the biggest story of next year too.
A slow motion implosion driven by multiple factors (esp Chinese competition).
Watch my primer on what's going on👇
What makes this moment so dangerous, so destructive for legacy carmakers, is that this is a perfect storm. Three main issues: 1. The shift from conventional engines to batteries is a DISRUPTIVE innovation. The kind of thing Clay Christensen wrote about.
This is a MASSIVE deal...
Think about a combustion engine.
An assembly of HUNDREDS of pieces of metal, all perfectly honed to turn fuel into motion.
Making these things is REALLY hard. Which is why:
a) that's where most of the value/jobs are
b) other countries have struggled to compete making them
Today we learnt the no of people flowing into the UK hit an all-time high last yr: an influx we've NEVER seen before either as a total or as a share of the population.
So... why is the @ONS (and some news organisations) reporting this as a FALL in migration?!
Let's dig deeper
🧵
The ONS publishes immigration figures every six months. There's a lot of data, with plenty of provisos all over it.
But as is often the case the story gets simplified in the telling.
Consider the story the last time the data came out. This is how the chart looked 👇
And here's how most people reported the numbers: immigration was going down. Yes, from unprecedented highs - but even so. Down by 10%. A success story, as far as the then govt was concerned.
🧵SALT🧵
It's been snowing in the UK and the road gritters are out in force, begging the question:
Have you ever wondered where that grit actually COMES from?
The answer is more magical, beautiful and fascinating than you probably realised.
1/14
Because that dirty-looking salt being spread by trucks on our roads is actually the remains of an ancient ocean (actually two ancient oceans), buried deep beneath our feet.
Most of the stuff being spread in London comes from a single mine in Cheshire - at Winsford.
2/14
Here, about 20 to 40m beneath the meadows of Cheshire, is an enormous slab of halite, rock salt, the remains of an ancient inland sea a couple of hundred million years ago.
This is where most of our salt comes from.
3/14
🧵How worried should we (and @RachelReevesMP) be about the slightly nervy reaction from financial markets towards her first Budget?
Short answer: certainly a bit worried.
But perhaps not for the reasons you might expect...
Worth saying at the outset: these markets are volatile.
Trying to interpret movements in govt bonds is v tricky.
They're moved by all sorts of factors - fiscal, monetary, economic and structural - from all over the world.
So yesterday's Budget is only one of many factors here...
Even so, there has been a marked rise in UK bond yields following the Budget which is greater than what we're seeing in other markets.
This morning the UK 10 year bond yield hit the highest level in nearly a year. It's up 1.7% since yday - far more than US or German equivalents