Ed Conway Profile picture
Nov 18, 2019 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Today on #CampaignCheck: The Liberal Democrats claim that they're now the party of "sound finance" with the toughest fiscal rules. bbc.co.uk/news/av/electi… This would be a big deal. Have they really taken the Tories' place as the party of fiscal discipline? To find out read on...
There are broadly speaking two kinds of fiscal rules. One which limits day-to-day spending/borrowing - CURRENT spending. The second kind puts limits on how much you can invest - CAPITAL spending. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it's worth emphasising:
ALL major UK parties (Con, Lab, LD) are loosening fiscal rules this election. ALL their plans imply govt will carry on notching up deficits as far as the eye can see. Most of this new spending will be on INVESTMENT. Key differentiator for the LibDems is on current spending...
Tories & Labour both propose balancing the current budget over a 3yr & 5yr horizon respectively. Their rules give them some (not much) headroom to spend more or cut taxes. This chart shows you broadly how much (NB Tory prob have more headroom following today's C-tax cut u-turn) Image
LibDem rule is to target a 1% of GDP SURPLUS on the current budget. In other words, it looks a lot tougher than the others' rules (the yellow line here). That implies cuts/tax rises - tho they say there'll be a "remain dividend" that will bring in money to help meet the target Image
But here's the thing, that target, designed by the @resfoundation, has some important small print (see below). It's better described as a "range" rather than a simple number target. If the economy disappoints the rule will allow the LibDems to borrow, well, quite a lot Image
In other words, the LibDem fiscal rule is actually better depicted like this: a massive range which, esp in the event of a recession, could allow them to borrow even more than the major two parties. Image
The LibDem rule on the current budget is in some ways more sensible than the other parties', which look quite inflexible. If there is a recession there's a sig chance Lab/Con bust their rules overnight. BUT do the LibDems really have TOUGHER rules than the others? Not really.
Esp when u consider what they're spending on investment: basically smack bang between Tories and Labour. "Sound finance"? "the party of fiscal responsibility"? Hmm, not quite. Rules maybe slightly better-structured but it's not clear they're much tougher #campaigncheck Image
I'm told the LibDems are also adopting the @resfoundation rule on investment: "to deliver an improvement in public sector net worth". Basically the same rule as Labour. They'll ask the NAO or OBR to regulate it and ensure those investments are sensible...
This @resfoundation report has been used as the blueprint for new fiscal rules for:
Conservatives ✅
Labour✅
And now the LibDems✅
raising a question: has ANY single recent think tank report had as much influence on economic policy? resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/20…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

Jun 18
🧵Some thoughts re inflation.
Not the data today, but two deep issues we should prob spend more time thinking about.
1. While economists and policymakers may have convinced themselves that the cost of living squeeze is over, for millions of households, it doesn't feel that way.
The key thing to remember here is that when economists talk about inflation what they're really talking about is the ANNUAL RATE at which a basket of goods and services changes price. And certainly, that rate is much lower than the 2022 peaks... Image
But, as I say, what that number is is simply looking at the difference in the LEVEL of prices over the past year. This chart is that level. (The actual consumer price index!).
And yes, look over the year to May and it's up 3.4%. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 12
🧵Why, barely 24 hours after the Spending Review, is everyone already going on about tax rises?
Are they REALLY coming?
Or is this an "incoherent argument", as one leading minister calls it?
Well here's a thread explaining what's really going on here.
Bear with me...
First things first.
Key thing to remember is that the main job of HMT is to generate enough money, mostly via taxes (left hand bar here), to finance all its spending (right hand bar).
If that left hand bar isn't high enough, we have to borrow to fill the gap.
That's the deficit! Image
This week's Spending Review was about the right hand column, obvs. But not ALL of the column.
Actually more than half of govt spending is on stuff that WASN'T covered by the spending review - on benefits, debt interest, pensions etc. It's called "annually managed expenditure"Image
Read 17 tweets
May 28
🧵
You may recall a spate of stories a few years ago about appalling working conditions & abysmally low pay in Leicester's clothes factories.
The hope was those stories would shame businesses into improving working conditions.
But here's what ACTUALLY happened next...
👇
Instead of staying in Leicester, most brands abandoned it & shifted production to N Africa & S Asia.
Today Britain's biggest centre of textile & apparel manufacture is battling the threat of extinction.
It's a mostly untold economic story we've spent recent months documenting Image
Once upon a time Leicester was the beating heart of UK clothes manufacturing.
The city was dotted with factories making clothes for big name brands.
Now, according to one estimate, the number of clothes factories has dropped from 1500 in 2017 to under 100 this year. A 95% fall. Image
Read 16 tweets
May 8
How big a deal is the new trade agreement unveiled between the US and the UK? Here are some initial thoughts.
Start with this: this is total UK exports to the US over the past 5yrs: £273bn. Right now most of this will face a 10% tariff. Some things (eg cars) face 25% extra Image
Let's break down that total. The biggest chunk is cars. Just under £30bn. That's covered under the agreement. So too are steel/aluminium exports. Much smaller at £2.7bn...
These sectors will benefit from special deals (though much of the detail still remains vague). Image
Image
Rolls Royce will apparently get tariff free access for its jet engines. That mostly helps Boeing, but also Rolls Royce. Jet engines comprise a surprisingly large chunk of UK exports to the US, about £17.3bn. So let's shade that red too... Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 27
🚨
The Chinese owners of British Steel say they are now considering shutting their blast furnaces and end steelmaking at Scunthorpe in early June - only a few months away.
It would mean an end of virgin steelmaking in the country that invented it during the industrial revolution
British Steel say the main question now is timing: whether the operations will close in June, in September or later.
It says tariffs are one of the reasons the blast furnaces are "no longer financially sustainable".
Press release 👇 Image
The news means @jreynoldsMP faces two interlocking crises in the coming months:
1. The imposition of US tariffs on an ever growing segment of British exports
2. The end of virgin steelmaking (the UK would be the first G7 country to face this watershed moment).
This is big stuff
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25
Donald Trump just announced 25% tariffs on anyone importing oil from Venezuela.
This is odd.
Because the country importing the most crude from Venezuela is... the US.
Capital Economics chart of Ven oil exports by Capital Economics via @rbrtrmstrng
But it raises a bigger point
🧵 Image
Why does the US import so much oil from Venezuela?
Mainly for the same reason it imports so much oil from Canada.
And no it's not just because they're close.
It's because most US refineries are set up to refine the kind of oil they have in Venezuela and Canada.
To understand this it helps to recall that crude oil is actually a broad term. There are LOTS of different varieties of crude - a function of the geology of where the oil formed and the organic ingredients that went into it millions of years ago.
It's called "crude" for a reason
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(