Today on #CampaignCheck: The Liberal Democrats claim that they're now the party of "sound finance" with the toughest fiscal rules. bbc.co.uk/news/av/electi… This would be a big deal. Have they really taken the Tories' place as the party of fiscal discipline? To find out read on...
There are broadly speaking two kinds of fiscal rules. One which limits day-to-day spending/borrowing - CURRENT spending. The second kind puts limits on how much you can invest - CAPITAL spending. Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it's worth emphasising:
ALL major UK parties (Con, Lab, LD) are loosening fiscal rules this election. ALL their plans imply govt will carry on notching up deficits as far as the eye can see. Most of this new spending will be on INVESTMENT. Key differentiator for the LibDems is on current spending...
Tories & Labour both propose balancing the current budget over a 3yr & 5yr horizon respectively. Their rules give them some (not much) headroom to spend more or cut taxes. This chart shows you broadly how much (NB Tory prob have more headroom following today's C-tax cut u-turn)
LibDem rule is to target a 1% of GDP SURPLUS on the current budget. In other words, it looks a lot tougher than the others' rules (the yellow line here). That implies cuts/tax rises - tho they say there'll be a "remain dividend" that will bring in money to help meet the target
But here's the thing, that target, designed by the @resfoundation, has some important small print (see below). It's better described as a "range" rather than a simple number target. If the economy disappoints the rule will allow the LibDems to borrow, well, quite a lot
In other words, the LibDem fiscal rule is actually better depicted like this: a massive range which, esp in the event of a recession, could allow them to borrow even more than the major two parties.
The LibDem rule on the current budget is in some ways more sensible than the other parties', which look quite inflexible. If there is a recession there's a sig chance Lab/Con bust their rules overnight. BUT do the LibDems really have TOUGHER rules than the others? Not really.
Esp when u consider what they're spending on investment: basically smack bang between Tories and Labour. "Sound finance"? "the party of fiscal responsibility"? Hmm, not quite. Rules maybe slightly better-structured but it's not clear they're much tougher #campaigncheck
I'm told the LibDems are also adopting the @resfoundation rule on investment: "to deliver an improvement in public sector net worth". Basically the same rule as Labour. They'll ask the NAO or OBR to regulate it and ensure those investments are sensible...
This @resfoundation report has been used as the blueprint for new fiscal rules for:
Conservatives ✅
Labour✅
And now the LibDems✅
raising a question: has ANY single recent think tank report had as much influence on economic policy? resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/20…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I hate to be pedantic (and no doubt this will mean I'll be labelled as one of those doomsters @KemiBadenoch is calling out here) but there's a few problems with the data the biz/trade sec is quoting here.
When you correct them, the picture looks a little different...
🧵
Let's start with the big one.
In all the charts in the @biztradegovuk document she quotes from, it looks like export volumes are bigger than ever before 👇
Hurrah!
Except this is true only when you fail to adjust for inflation. Which, as we all know, has been VERY high recently
Let's take the same @ONS database and use the inflation-adjusted series, as we really should when comparing flows over time.
Suddenly, what looked like an ever-increasing volume of trade is actually a lot more flat.
Goods exports (dark blue bars) are still well below pre-Brexit.
NEW
Britain's motoring lobby group the @SMMT has insisted that an unprecedented 2,000% increase in car exports to Azerbaijan has NOTHING to with Russia and is explained by the fact that this former Soviet state is a “flourishing market in its own right”.
This is rather... odd
🧵
Before we get onto that, some background (thread on this here👇).
TLDR: UK car exports to Russia have collapsed, because of sanctions. But UK car exports to countries neighbouring Russia have suddenly risen by nearly the same amount. Esp Azerbaijan
Following my original report we now have new figs on UK car exports.
They show flows to Azerbaijan have continued. £42m in Jan. 3rd highest EVER.
Now there's no way of being 100% sure what's going on here. you can't track consignments beyond Azerbaijan (if they ever reach Az)
🚨The strange tale of British luxury cars & Russian sanctions🚨
🧵A thread on some v striking charts which raise some disturbing questions abt the car industry.
Let's start at the start.
Wealthy Russians love high-end British cars.
Don't just take it from me. Take it from her 👇
So when Russia invaded Ukraine, it was not without significance that all Britain's major carmakers said they would stop sending their cars to Russia.
Anyway, shortly afterwards, the UK imposed sanctions which made it illegal to do so anyway...
There are two sanctions of note here.
First, UK companies cannot send "dual use" items to Russia which could be turned into weapons.
Second, there was a specific ban on the sale of any car over £42k👇
So it's pretty simple. No cars. Esp not luxury cars. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/452/…
💷BUDGET THREAD💷
A few thoughts on what was supposed to be a big event but ended up feeling, well, a wee bit thin.
And that’s the first thing to say.
Strikingly, this Budget was HALF as big as the Autumn Statement. Look at the difference between the scorecard totals 👇
Was it a tax-cutting Budget?
I mean… not really.
Well, OK, the net impact is taxes aren’t going up as quickly as they were 6 months ago.
But (and I think this is pretty crucial) THEY’RE STILL GOING UP. The tax burden will be higher at the end of this Parliament than before.
Here’s a good illustration of that.
The bars here show you the impact, across the economy, of the decision a few Budgets ago to freeze tax allowances. The bars are in negative territory.
People are paying more in taxes as they get dragged into higher thresholds…
🧵Here's a thread about an obscure economic theory from a century and a half ago, which is about to become a MASSIVE deal.
⚡️It helps explains why tackling climate change is going to be v v hard. Some say impossible.
The story begins with this building👇
Yes it's the @SphereVegas.
Not just a massive entertainment venue but also the world's biggest screen. By all accounts it's an amazing spectacle both outside and in, where there's also a ginormous wraparound LED screen (also one of the biggest anywhere)
Get up close to that enormous exterior screen & it looks v different.
You see an array of little glowing pucks, each one decked with 48 light emitting diodes (LEDs). These act as the "pixels" of the image you see from miles around. These things are magic businessinsider.com/what-the-las-v…
🚨How British companies are bolstering Vladimir Putin’s war machine🚨
A depressing thread.
But an important one.
With some pretty shocking charts.
Let’s begin with the “official” picture. It suggests UK trade with Russia has collapsed since Feb 2022. Down by 74%…
Now let's fill in the data.
Look how we're no longer exporting cars or heavy machinery to Russia. Because the govt is well aware this stuff could be repurposed into weapons. So the official line is that this is a big success story.
Looks like Russia's economy is being starved
But clearly the Russian economy isn't doing as badly as all that. Indeed Russia is due to grow faster than any G7 nation this year 👇
And that's just the economy. Now look at the battlefield and Russia is looking v strong. No shortage of weapons/drones etc despite sanctions
Why?